Table of Contents
Introduction
The Ages of the Earth
Creation Versus Evolution
‘Summing Up’ in Christ
The Hidden Ages
God So Loves the World
Hell and the Lake of Fire
The Glorious Gospel
A Full Salvation
A Final Note
Appendix
Some Who Held This View
For Christ must reign until He has put all His
enemies under His feet. The last enemy that will be
abolished is death... When all things are subjected
to Him, then the Son Himself also will be subjected
to the One who subjected all things to Him, so that
Yahweh may be all in all.
I Corinthians 15:25, 26, 28
Copyright © 2002 by Joseph Herrin
Permission of the author is hereby granted for
copying, printing and distributing this book to
others, either in part or in whole. However, no
charge may be associated with the distribution.
Heart4God Publishing
website: http://heart4god.8k.com
e-mail: jbherrin@heart4god.8k.com
Joseph Herrin
Introduction
This book originally began as an article of the same
name. The article was somewhat lengthy, being
some 34 pages, but I have found it necessary to
expand on this original writing to answer some of
the sincere questions that have arisen as the saints
have considered the message it brings. There have
also been those who have called the contents of this
writing heresy, for it goes against what has been
commonly taught and understood since the Dark
Ages. Little light has been shone upon these matters
through many long centuries. Truth has been
confused and corrupted by the mixing of myths and
fables with that which is divine, until tradition has
handed the multitude of the saints something that
is unrecognizable from the original.
I am not angry that some have reacted to these
teachings as heresy. I understand the objections,
and there was a time not too distant that I might
have joined them in their judgment. Yet, as the
Spirit brings light we only have two options: we can
remain in darkness, or we can embrace the light. I
cannot now go back to the dark teachings of current
tradition, for to do so would be to shrink back from
the truth. What I do ask of those who cry "heresy" is
that they would give this matter a fair hearing. It is
not wisdom to revile without investigation.
Proverbs 18:13
He who gives an answer before he hears, it is folly
and shame to him.
For those of you who have not read the article that
preceded the writing of this book, you may well
wonder, "What is the reason for the charge of
heresy?" It arises from this author believing and
teaching that Paul plainly meant what he said in the
following verses:
Ephesians 1:9-10
He made known to us the mystery of His will,
according to His kind intention which He purposed
in Him with a view to a stewardship suitable to the
fullness of the times, that is, THE SUMMING UP
OF ALL THINGS IN CHRIST, THINGS IN THE
HEAVENS AND THINGS ON THE EARTH IN HIM.
Colossians 1:19-20
For it was the Father's good pleasure for all the
fulness to dwell in Him, and through Him to
reconcile ALL things to Himself, having made peace
through the blood of His cross; through Him, I say
whether things on EARTH or things in HEAVEN.
I Corinthians 15:23-28
But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits,
after that those who are Christ's at His coming, then
comes the end, when He delivers up the kingdom to
God the Father, when He has abolished all rule and
all authority and power. For He must reign until He
has put ALL His enemies under His feet. The last
enemy that will be abolished is death. For He has
put AL L things in subjection under His feet. But
when He says, "ALL things are put in subjection," it
is evident that He is excepted who put ALL things in
subjection to Him. And when ALL things are
subjected to Him, then the Son Himself also will be
subjected to the One who subjected all things to
Him, that God may be ALL in ALL.
These passages of Scripture declare that ALL things
in heaven and earth will be reconciled to God
through the cross of Christ. Have you ever
considered what things in heaven might need
reconciling to God? The Scriptures reveal that there
is a great host of angelic beings that have
abandoned their positions of service that Yahweh
had ordained through the power of His own
authority. These beings rejected the government of
God and entered into rebellion. The chief
instrument in this rebellion was Satan, and he
furthered this rebellion by enticing man to also
abandon the place ordained for him.
Both in heaven and on earth there is much that now
needs to be reconciled to God. Some would object
and say, "but Satan is the enemy of God." This is
true. And it is no less true that man was God’s
enemy when Christ went to the cross.
Romans 5:8-10
But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in
that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
Much more then, having now been justified by His
blood, we shall be saved from the wrath of God
through Him. For if while we were enemies
we were reconciled to God through the death of
His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we
shall be saved by His life.
Yahshua did not wait until man became good to die
for man. He died for man while we were sinners and
his enemies. On the cross Yahshua asked the Father
to forgive the very ones who were crucifying Him
and mocking Him. Like Satan and the angels that
transgressed with him, there are many men today
who are still defiant in the face of God. However,
the Scripture is true that Christ died for ALL men.
I Timothy 2:3-4
This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our
Savior, who desires ALL MEN to be saved and to
come to the knowledge of the truth.
I Timothy 4:10
For it is for this we labor and strive, because we
have fixed our hope on the living God, who is the
Savior of ALL MEN, especially of believers.
Titus 2:11
For the grace of God has appeared, bringing
salvation to ALL MEN...
Romans 5:18
So then as through one transgression there resulted
condemnation to ALL MEN, even so through one
act of righteousness there resulted justification of
life to ALL MEN.
Saint, do you see how plainly evident this truth is
stated in the Scripture? Look at the contrast Paul
makes in Romans 5:18. "Through one transgression
there resulted condemnation to ALL MEN." Is there
any man who has been born that Adam’s
transgression did not touch, resulting in
condemnation? No, not one. Will we then not
accept the plain meaning of the next statement that
through Christ’s obedience "there resulted
justification of life to ALL MEN"?
Our difficulty is that we do not see this justification
in the current age. There are men that stubbornly
resist the grace of God for their entire lifespan while
in this sinful flesh. We do not see them come to
repentance. We do not see them bow the knee to
Christ now during this age. Yet we are promised
that the age will come when ALL will do so.
Isaiah 45:22-23
"Turn to Me and be saved, all the ends of the earth;
For I am God, and there is no other. I have sworn by
Myself, the word has gone forth from My mouth in
righteousness and will not turn back, that to Me
EVERY KNEE will bow, EVERY TONGUE will
swear allegiance."
Philippians 2:8-11
Being found in appearance as a man, He humbled
Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death,
even death on a cross. For this reason also, God
highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name
which is above every name, so that at the name of
Yahshua EVERY KNEE WILL BOW, of those who
are IN HEAVEN and ON EARTH and UNDER THE
EARTH, and that EVERY TONGUE will confess that
Yahshua the Messiah is Lord, to the glory of God the
Father.
Yahweh has sworn by Himself that "EVERY knee
will bow, EVERY tongue will swear allegiance."
Isaiah declared these words in the last age, the age
of Law, and did not see it fulfilled. Paul proclaims
the same words in this age, the age of grace, and we
do not see it fulfilled. Should we then doubt
Yahweh’s power to accomplish what He has
declared? No! There are ages still to come, and the
word of Yahweh will be accomplished. What a
glorious promise, "Every knee will bow, and every
tongue will confess that Yahshua Messiah is Lord to
the glory of God the Father.
I have heard the arguments of those who say that
this bending of the knee and confession will be done
under compulsion and duress, yet I ask you, "would
it glorify the Father for men and angels to hold
rebellion in their hearts while making this
confession?" No, it would not. We are told that this
confession will be "to the glory of God the Father."
That which will bring glory to the Father is for all
creation to come to the end of rebellion and to
declare from a worshipful heart that Yahshua
Messiah is Lord.
If you will be as a Berean and search the Scriptures
to see whether these things be true, you will be
amazed at what you find. I invite you to read
through this book and to faithfully study and
consider the whole counsel of the Scriptures
concerning these matters. You will find that Yahweh
has a plan that encompasses many ages. Some of
these ages existed before Adam. A number have
transpired since Adam, and more are to come. Yet,
when the age that ends all ages has been completed
and time is no more, then will we see that there is
no longer an enemy left to oppose the will of
Yahweh. All will have come to a state of rest. All
creation shall be in perfect agreement with His will.
Then shall we know that which Paul spoke of, "All
things will be subjected to Him " and "God will be
ALL in ALL."
The Ages of the Earth
Before we look at God’s ultimate plan to subject and
reconcile all of creation to Himself, that He might
become all in all, it would be helpful to look at the
ages of the earth that we live on. These ages are not
commonly taught today by those who stand as
ministers to the body. In a day when it seems that
technological understanding is increasing, the
saints also need to regain an understanding of the
wisdom contained in Scripture, for much has been
lost over the years, and many myths and fables have
replaced sound doctrine. We must reestablish this
understanding of the ages of the earth in order to go
on to other matters.
Our world has known many different ages, and
there are yet more ages to come. The Scriptures
reveal that their will be three creations of the earth,
and it will abide in seven distinct states. The
numbers three and seven are very significant in
Scriptures, and much has been written about them.
The tertiary (three-fold) and septenary (seven-fold)
design of Scriptures and of all creation is seen
profusely. It is to be expected that this world would
fit right into this pattern. However, if one follows
the commonly held doctrines and theories of the
creation, or evolution, of this world, they will fail to
align with God’s very evident structure.
In the next chapter we will look at some of the
various explanations given today for the origin of
the creation. The saints are confronted with many
varying theories today that range everywhere from
creation accounts of a literal six days of creation and
a young earth viewpoint, to evolutionary depictions
that state that the earth is billions of years old. In
between these two extremes are many hybrid
theories, such as theistic evolution, that seek to
reconcile the Biblical account with the claims of
science (whether factual or hypothetical).
All but one of the current depictions of creation that
I have encountered have shortcomings, and many of
them are very serious shortcomings. They also fail
to answer many questions, such as "Why is the earth
described as formless and void and covered in
darkness in Genesis 1:2?" "When did Satan rebel,
ending in his being cast down to the earth?" "When
did Satan exist in Eden in his perfect state as
described in Ezekiel 28:13 and following?" "If one
holds to an old earth theory, how do you reconcile
the fact that the genealogies of man show him to
have only existed about 6,000 years?" "If one holds
to a young earth theory, how does one reconcile
themselves to the many evidences of a much older
earth?" "At what point did the dinosaurs exist, for
the evidence of their existence is undeniable?" "How
do these depictions of the earth fit in with the
tertiary (three-fold) and septenary (seven-fold)
structure of creation?"
There is one particular school of thought regarding
Genesis that I have found to satisfy both Scriptural
testimony and natural evidences. This school of
thought was accepted by many early church fathers,
and was actually the prevailing understanding of the
church about 100 years ago. However, popularity is
never to be a foundation to build our understanding
upon. Paul said:
II Timothy 3:16-17
All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for
teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in
righteousness; so that the man of God may be
adequate, equipped for every good work.
It is the Scriptures, inspired by the Spirit of Yahweh,
that should form the foundation upon which all
teaching rests. It is not only valuable for teaching,
but for reproof and correction. The Scriptures bring
reproof and correction to most of the prevailing
theories being taught today, and they provide all the
teaching necessary to understand the witness of
Genesis correctly, so let us examine what the
Scriptures tell us about the origin of the creation.
In the opening verse of Genesis we read that "In the
beginning Elohim created the heavens and the
earth." We know that God is timeless, so the
beginning spoken of here does not refer to His
beginning. Rather, the beginning spoken of here is
the beginning of the creation which God made. The
creation is subject to time, the Creator is not. Before
the creation was formed, God already had a plan
that would encompass all the ages of creation. He
saw the end from the beginning. God knew that
man would sin, and He knew that the cross of Christ
would be that which would reconcile creation back
to Himself. He knew every person who would ever
be born, thus we are told:
Ephesians 1:3-6
Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Yahshua
the Messiah, who has blessed us with every spiritual
blessing in the heavenly places in Messiah, just as
He chose us in Him before the foundation of
the world, that we would be holy and
blameless before Him in love. He
predestined us to adoption as sons through
Yahshua the Messiah to Himself, according to the
kind intention of His will, to the praise of the glory
of His grace, which He freely bestowed on us in the
Beloved.
Before the foundation of the world Yahweh knew us
and chose us to be holy and blameless before Him,
and He predestined us to adoption as sons. God was
not caught off guard when the first man and woman
sinned. God did not have to go to plan B. He already
had seen the end from the beginning, and He knew
about Adam’s choice, and He had already planned
what His own response would be. His plan of the
ages has experienced no setbacks. It has not been
stymied or thwarted in any way. There have been no
unanticipated occurrences for God.
Thus we see in the opening verse of Genesis, that in
the beginning of the creation He made the heavens
and the earth, but by verse two we see that
something had transpired to mar what He had
created. This understanding is obscured, however,
due to the fact that in most modern translations of
the Scriptures, verse two of Genesis chapter one is
rendered improperly.
Genesis 1:1-2
In the beginning God created the heaven and the
earth. And the earth was without form, and void;
and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the
Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
All of the most popular English translations render
this passage similarly, but they have borrowed from
each other and have duplicated one another’s
mistakes. The rendering here makes it sound like
God created the earth formless and void, yet other
Scriptures reveal that this is not true. God did not
create the earth formless and void.
The phrase "And the earth was without form and
void" should be properly rendered, "but the earth
became formless and void". The words in question
are rendered correctly in other places in the first few
chapters of Genesis, so the translators knew they
could be rendered this way, but it did not fit with
their understanding, or the orthodoxy of the day.
The word rendered in the KJV as "was" is the
Hebrew word "hayah" and it is the same word used
in the Genesis 2:7, "Adam became a living soul."
Strong’s concordance identifies the meaning of this
word as "to become" or, "come to pass". Similarly
the word rendered "and" is the Hebrew "wa" and it
is a conjunction that is often rendered "but". The
KJV translators rendered this word as "but" in the
very next chapter, for in Genesis 2:6 we read, "but
a mist used to..."
So we can see that the translators could have as
easily rendered these beginning verses in this
manner:
Genesis 1:1-2
In the beginning God created the heaven and the
earth. But the earth became formless, and void;
and darkness was upon the face of the deep.
This would indicate that in the beginning of
creation the Father created the heavens and the
earth, but something occurred after this creation
that made the earth formless, void, and covered
with darkness. We have seen that we can interpret
these words this way, but we must ask if we should
interpret them this way. We can verify conclusively
that this is how this Scripture should be rendered by
comparing this passage with others. If we can find
similar descriptions in other Scriptures of the earth
becoming formless, void and covered in darkness as
a result of judgment, then we will know the earth
was not created this way, it became this way as a
result of sin. The following passage from Jeremiah
provides a real key for our understanding. As you
read it, note clearly that everything about this
passage is speaking of the judgment of God being
manifested due to the presence of sin and rebellion.
Jeremiah 4:16-28
Make ye mention to the nations; behold, publish
against Jerusalem, that watchers come from a far
country, and give out their voice against the cities of
Judah. As keepers of a field, are they against her
round about; because she hath been rebellious
against me, saith Yahweh. Thy way and thy doings
have procured these things unto thee; this is thy
wickedness, because it is bitter, because it reacheth
unto thine heart. My bowels, my bowels! I am
pained at my very heart; my heart maketh a noise in
me; I cannot hold my peace, because thou hast
heard, O my soul, the sound of the trumpet, the
alarm of war. Destruction upon destruction is cried;
for the whole land is spoiled: suddenly are my tents
spoiled, and my curtains in a moment. How long
shall I see the standard, and hear the sound of the
trumpet? For my people are foolish, they have not
known me; they are sottish children, and they have
none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to
do good they have no knowledge. I beheld the
earth, and, lo, it was without form, and
void; and the heavens, and they had no
light. I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they
trembled, and all the hills moved lightly. I beheld,
and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the
heavens were fled. I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful
place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof
were broken down at the presence of Yahweh, and
by his fierce anger. For thus hath Yahweh said,
The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I
not make a full end. For this shall the earth
mourn, and the heavens above be black:
because I have spoken it, I have purposed it, and
will not repent, neither will I turn back from it.
It is plainly evident that this passage is speaking of
a judgment of Yahweh coming about due to
rebellion and disobedience. As part of this judgment
the land is made formless, void, and covered in
darkness. These are the three same descriptive
words we find in Genesis 1:2, and these words only
occur in this combination in these two passages,
and one other. The third instance is in Isaiah 34
where the destruction of Babylon is prophesied.
Isaiah 34:11
But the cormorant and the bittern shall possess it;
the owl also and the raven shall dwell in it: and he
shall stretch out upon it the line of confusion, and
the stones of emptiness. KJV
The words that were rendered as "formless" and
"void" in the previous verses are rendered as
"confusion" and "emptiness" in Isaiah. In the
Hebrew the words are "tohu" and "bohu". These are
the only three instances where these words occur
together in all of Scripture. Seeing that both
Jeremiah and Isaiah used these words to describe
the appearance of the earth, or a portion of it,
brought about by a judgment of God, we can
reasonably conclude that this is also what
precipitated the condition of the earth found in
Genesis 1:2. Yet we can find even more evidence to
support this conclusion. Isaiah further tells us the
following:
Isaiah 45:18
For thus says Yahweh, who created the heavens (He
is the God who formed the earth and made it, He
established it and did not create it a waste
place, But formed it to be inhabited)...
Isaiah tells us that Yahweh did not create the earth
as a waste place, yet in Genesis 1:2 we find that it
has become one. Isaiah doesn’t stop here, however,
he gives us even more evidence by which we might
properly interpret Genesis 1:2.
Isaiah 24:1
Behold, Yahweh lays the earth waste, devastates it,
distorts its surface and scatters its inhabitants.
Making the earth waste is always an act of
judgment. So let us look one more time at the
correct rendering of the first 2 verses of Genesis.
Genesis 1:1-2
In the beginning God created the heaven and the
earth. But the earth became formless, and void;
and darkness was upon the face of the deep.
In order to understand God’s plan of the ages, we
must render these verses correctly. In reading this
we can now see that at the very beginning of the
creation that God made the heavens and the earth.
He did not create them a waste. He created them
perfect. Yet something occurred to mar their
perfection, and by looking at the language of verse
two and comparing it to the rest of scripture we
understand that it was due to a judgment of God
that the earth was made formless, void and covered
in darkness. All of these conditions are symbolic of
judgment. We can then further understand that the
remainder of chapter one of Genesis speaks of the
re-creation of the earth, and not its first creation.
Now this is a very important point, and it is largely
unseen by the church due to a wrong orthodoxy and
poor Bible translations. We must ask, "What
occurred on this original earth that caused Yahweh
to judge it so completely?" We are only given one
event that could have caused such a judgment to be
rendered and this was something prior to the
creation of Adam. It was the rebellion of Satan.
Ezekiel 28:12-18
Thus says Yahweh GOD, "You had the seal of
perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
"You were in Eden, the garden of God; every
precious stone was your covering: the ruby, the
topaz and the diamond; the beryl, the onyx and the
jasper; the lapis lazuli, the turquoise and the
emerald; and the gold, the workmanship of your
settings and sockets, was in you. On the day that
you were created they were prepared. You were the
anointed cherub who covers, and I placed you there.
You were on the holy mountain of God; you walked
in the midst of the stones of fire. You were
blameless in your ways from the day you were
created until unrighteousness was found in you. By
the abundance of your trade you were internally
filled with violence, and you sinned; therefore I
have cast you as profane from the
mountain of God. And I have destroyed you,
O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones
of fire. Your heart was lifted up because of your
beauty; you corrupted your wisdom by reason of
your splendor. I cast you to the ground; I put
you before kings, that they may see you. By the
multitude of your iniquities, in the unrighteousness
of your trade you profaned your sanctuaries.
Therefore I have brought fire from the
midst of you; it has consumed you, and I
have turned you to ashes on the earth in the
eyes of all who see you."
Isaiah 14:12-17
How you have fallen from heaven, O star of the
morning, son of the dawn! You have been cut
down to the earth, you who have weakened the
nations! But you said in your heart, 'I will ascend to
heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of
God, and I will sit on the mount of assembly in the
recesses of the north. I will ascend above the heights
of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most
High.' Nevertheless you will be thrust down to
Sheol, to the recesses of the pit. Those who see you
will gaze at you, they will ponder over you, saying,
'Is this the one who made the earth tremble, who
shook kingdoms, who made the world like a
wilderness and overthrew its cities, who did not
allow his prisoners to go home?'"
Luke 10:18
And He said to them, "I was watching Satan fall
from heaven like lightning."
The Scriptures reveal that the angels existed prior to
man, and among the angels was a most magnificent
cherub called Lucifer. He was created perfect in
beauty and in wisdom, and his role among the
angels was very exalted. Yet this being took his eyes
off of his Creator and began to look at his own
magnificence and this led to pride and the
corrupting of his wisdom. Paul refers to this
transgression in the following verse where he is
speaking to Timothy about the qualifications for an
elder:
I Timothy 3:6
and not a new convert, so that he will not become
conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred
by the devil.
Satan's fall began with the formation of conceit and
pride within his heart. This pride led to rebellion,
and ended in judgment. Ezekiel and Isaiah both
wrote of the judgment of Satan as having occurred
already, but in Revelation we read of it as a future
event.
Revelation 12:7-9
And there was war in heaven, Michael and his
angels waging war with the dragon. The dragon and
his angels waged war, and they were not strong
enough, and there was no longer a place found for
them in heaven. And the great dragon was thrown
down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and
Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was thrown
down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down
with him.
The Scriptures do not contradict each other here,
for Satan has been cast down to the earth in the
past, and he will be cast down again in the future.
Satan will be judged by God a total of three times
before his judgment is complete. The number three
is an important number in Scripture, representing
fulness. Thus we see Elohim being Father, Son and
Spirit. We find man being body, soul and spirit, etc..
We also find that Satan’s judgment is only complete
after the third judgment rendered to him by
Yahweh.
Isaiah, Ezekiel and Yahshua spoke of the first
judgment where Satan was cast down. This is when
the original earth was destroyed. Yet after a time the
Spirit came and began to re-create the earth and at
this time Satan was released from his first
imprisonment. We then see him in Eden enticing
Adam and Eve to sin, and the fall of man became
the instrument of Satan’s elevation over this world
once again. Yahweh did not make Satan "the god of
this world", "the prince of the power of the air."
Man gave him this authority when he joined in
Satan’s rebellion. Yet we are told that, during the
millennial reign of Christ, Satan will be bound
again, this time for a thousand years. This is the
second judgment of Satan. After the thousand years
he will be released for a short time, and then his
third and final judgment will come.
Revelation 20:1-3
Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven,
holding the key of the abyss and a great chain in his
hand. And he laid hold of the dragon, the serpent of
old, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for
a thousand years; and he threw him into the abyss,
and shut it and sealed it over him, so that he would
not deceive the nations any longer, until the
thousand years were completed; after these things
he must be released for a short time.
So now we can understand the meaning of the
opening verses of Genesis.
Genesis 1:1-2
In the beginning God created the heaven and the
earth. But the earth became formless, and void;
and darkness was upon the face of the deep.
In the beginning of the creation, God made the
heaven and the earth. Satan was upon this earth in
his perfect state before his fall, for Isaiah tells us,
"You were in Eden, the garden of God; every
precious stone was your covering...." We never see
Satan described this way after Adam and Eve are
placed in the re-created Garden of Eden. Instead,
we find him coming in the form of a serpent. We
can therefore understand that this description of
Satan in his perfection and glory in Eden pertains to
the first creation of the earth.
We are not told how long Satan remained
blameless. His fall might have been after many long
ages, or it might have come soon after he was
created. Therefore, we also do not know how long
the original earth existed before Satan rebelled. It
could have been an immense period of time, long
enough to account for the many signs of an ancient
earth. At some point Satan did rebel and he was cast
down to the earth, which was evidently his
habitation since he was described as being in the
original Eden. The earth was judged along with
Satan and made waste and void and sealed in
darkness. In this state of judgment the earth might
have lain for many long years.
There are many who teach today that the earth is
only about 6,000 years old, and they cite many
evidences for a young earth. Yet when the scriptures
are correctly understood we find that the earth
existed prior to Genesis 1:3 when God began to
remake it. Many scientists are also pointing to signs
of the earth being very ancient. In truth, both
groups are correct. The original earth is quite
ancient, yet the re-created earth is relatively young.
We should anticipate that there would be evidences
of both a young earth, and a very old earth. Sadly,
these two groups often find themselves pitted
against one another when the Scriptures reveal a
harmony to this evidence.
There is much physical evidence that the earth was
once covered in massive blankets of ice. I suspect
that this occurred during the period of the earth’s
judgment when it lay in darkness. I also see little
scriptural evidence to suggest that the dinosaurs, in
all of their variety and numbers, existed concurrent
with Adam. Some suggest that they were destroyed
at the flood of Noah, yet the scriptures do not
present this evidence. We are told:
Genesis 7:1-3
Then Yahweh said to Noah, "Enter the ark, you and
all your household, for you alone I have seen to be
righteous before Me in this time. You shall take with
you of every clean animal by sevens, a male
and his female; and of the animals that are not
clean two, a male and his female; also of the
birds of the sky, by sevens, male and female, to keep
offspring alive on the face of all the earth.
We are not told of any animals being left out of the
ark, so I am led to believe that the dinosaurs were
inhabitants of the original earth and were not alive
at the time of Noah. This conclusion is also
supported by the finding that so many of the
dinosaurs appear to have perished in a great
cataclysm, which is fitting with an understanding of
the destruction of the first earth. Some have
suggested that the Behemoth and Leviathan of Job
are speaking of dinosaurs. However, those who hold
this point of view should consider that Job lived
after the flood, and for dinosaurs to exist after the
flood would mandate that Noah took dinosaurs on
the ark. We must then deal with the question of
what might have caused them to perish after the
flood, for we see no report of them in the Bible.
Certainly if they had existed concurrent to modern
man, they would have been frequently mentioned.
Yet we see David performing a great exploit by
guarding his sheep from a lion and a bear, not from
a T-Rex and a Pterydactyl.
In the book of Job, which is considered by many to
be the oldest written book of the Bible, we find that
men of the time of Job understood that God had
brought a judgment on the original earth and sealed
it in darkness. Consider the following words:
Job 9:4-7
"Wise in heart and mighty in strength, who has
defied Him without harm? It is God who removes
the mountains, they know not how, when He
overturns them in His anger; who shakes the earth
out of its place, and its pillars tremble; who
commands the sun not to shine, and sets a seal
upon the stars..."
In these verses we find a description of God’s
judgment upon the earth when Satan defied Him.
In judgment God made the earth a wasteland and
sealed it up in darkness, as is described here. He
commanded the sun not to shine, and He sealed up
the stars.
There are other evidences that point to the account
of Genesis 1:3 and following as referring to the
re-creation of the earth, and not it's original creation.
One evidence is seen in the following verse:
Genesis 1:27-28
So God created man in his own image, in the image
of God created he him; male and female created he
them. And God blessed them, and God said unto
them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the
earth, and subdue it:
KJV
This phrase, "replenish the earth", means to fill it
again. You can only replenish something that has
been made empty. We speak of replenishing the
supply of food in our cupboards when the
cupboards have been empty. We would not use the
word 'replenish' if we were filling the cupboard the
first time. In such a case we would speak of filling
the cupboards, not re-filling them.
Some of our common English translations have
understood this and they have changed the word
'replenish' to 'fill', but the original language
supports the word 'replenish' as being the more
appropriate word. The root word in the Hebrew is
'male' (mal - ay), and it means to fill. But the form
of the word found in this passage, and in only a few
other occurrences all bear the
replenishing, or refilling. We find this same word
form used in Genesis 9:1 where God is speaking to
Noah after the flood.
Genesis 9:1
And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto
them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the
earth.
KJV
We can understand very plainly that 'replenish' is
the appropriate word to be used in this passage, for
all but a remnant of living creatures perished in the
great flood. Mankind had been completely judged
and destroyed, with the exception of Noah and his
family. They were to replenish the earth. They were
not just to fill it, they were to refill it, for it had
previously been filled, but now was empty.
This is also the understanding we have of Genesis
chapters 1 and 2 when we understand them
properly. The original earth had been previously
inhabited, but it was made waste and void at the
judgment of Satan. Adam and his wife were called
to replenish the earth that had become depopulated.
This same word form also occurs in the following
verse.
Genesis 1:21-22
And God created great whales, and every living
creature that moveth, which the waters brought
forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged
fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and
multiply, and fill the waters in the seas...
KJV
To be consistent, this verse also should read
"replenish the waters in the seas", for it uses the
exact word form as the two verses we have just
examined. Sadly, there has been a great
inconsistency in the way certain word forms have
been rendered, and this inconsistency has led to the
obscuring of the true understanding of many
Scriptures.
Now we are prepared to talk about the three
creations of the earth, and it's seven unique stages.
We should expect the earth to conform to this
pattern, for it is a pattern that is pervasive
throughout God’s creation. We mentioned that the
tertiary structure of creation is seen in the tri-part
nature of man. We also see that there were three
great feasts that God ordained for Israel to observe,
Passover, Pentecost and Tabernacles. We see that
the Tabernacle of Moses and the Temple were
divided into three distinct areas, the Outer Court,
the Holy Place, and the Holy of Holies. We see that
the saints are described by John in three levels of
maturity, little children, young men, and fathers.
We see that time has three great divisions, past,
present, and future. We could list pages of such
examples of the tertiary design of creation. It should
then not surprise us to find that there are three
earths described in scripture.
THE FIRST EARTH
Genesis 1:1
In the beginning God created the heavens and the
earth.
The Scriptures do not tell us a lot about this first
earth, for this earth was not the earth of man. It
seems that during the present age Yahweh has only
revealed things to us on a "need to know" basis. He
has revealed enough for man to have understanding
of his present place in creation, but He has not yet
allowed man's curiosity to be fully satisfied by
looking clearly into ages that preceded his existence,
nor future ages. Of these things, we are only given
glimpses. What we are told is that this first earth
was destroyed at the judgment of Satan, and for this
reason we find it lying in a state of ruin and
darkness in Genesis 1:2.
THE SECOND EARTH
Genesis 1:3 begins the re-creation of the earth. This
is the second earth, and the earth of Adam and Eve.
This is the earth man has known for the past 6,000
years. This earth too shall pass away.
II Peter 3:7, 10
But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by
the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire
against the day of judgment and perdition of
ungodly men... But the day of the Lord will come
like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with
a roar and the elements will be destroyed with
intense heat, and the earth and its works will be
burned up.
Matthew 24:35
"Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words
will not pass away."
THE THIRD EARTH
After the second earth is destroyed by fire, Yahweh
will then create the earth a third and final time.
Revelation 21:1
Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the
former heaven and the former earth passed away,
and there is no longer any sea.
We see then that even as man is a tri-part being that
was formed of the dust of the earth, so too the earth
will have it’s three creations. Yet within this tri-part
design we see a further seven-part division. This is
in harmony with other acts and creations of God.
Consider that there were three great feasts given to
Israel where they were commanded to appear
before Yahweh in Jerusalem three times a year.
These great feasts are Passover, Pentecost, and
Tabernacles. Yet these three feasts break down into
seven distinct events, for Passover has three parts to
it, as does Tabernacles. Passover includes The
Passover, The Feast of Unleavened Bread, and The
Sheaf of Firstfruits. Tabernacles includes The
Blowing of the Trumpets, The Day of Atonement,
and The Feast of Tabernacles. Thus the three great
feasts have their seven divisions.
The same pattern is seen regarding the earth. We
have seen its three creations. Now we will see the
seven divisions within these creations. At each
division the earth exists in a distinct state that is set
apart from the others. They are as follows.
FIRST STATE - THE ORIGINAL EARTH
Genesis 1:1
"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the
Earth..."
In this first creation the earth is perfect. The
original Garden of Eden was found here, and
Lucifer before his fall walked in this garden. It is my
belief, and that of other Bible teachers such as
Watchman Nee (see his book "The Mystery of
Creation"), that this was the earth upon which the
dinosaurs dwelt.
SECOND STATE - THE JUDGED EARTH
Genesis 1:2
"But the Earth became formless and void and
darkness covered the face of the deep."
It is obvious that this earth exists in a different state
than it had previously known. Even as the sky was
darkened from the ninth to the twelfth hour during
the crucifixion of Christ when the judgment for all
sin was laid upon the back of Yahshua the spotless
Lamb, so this earth under judgment is sealed in
darkness where no light can penetrate.
THIRD STATE - THE RE-CREATED EARTH
Genesis 1:3 - 31 describes for us the re-creation of
the earth. Note that the very first thing that occurs
is the removing of the judgment of darkness.
Genesis 1:3
Then God said, "Let there be light"; and there was
light."
This verse is unlike the other verses of the creation
account. It does not say here that God created the
light. It merely states that God said, "Let there be
light." Light already existed in the creation, but the
judged earth had been sealed up against this light.
This judgment has to be removed in order for God
to begin re-making the earth. The earth is then
formed once again according to the design of God,
and a new garden of Eden is placed upon the earth
and man and woman are set as inhabitants in the
midst of it.
FOURTH STATE - AFTER THE SIN OF ADAM
After Adam sinned, the earth became subject to the
curse. Paul speaks of it in this way:
Romans 8:20-22
For the creation was subjected to futility, not
willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, in
hope that the creation itself also will be set free from
its slavery to corruption into the freedom of the
glory of the children of God. For we know that the
whole creation groans and suffers the pains of
childbirth together until now.
This earth now brings forth thorns and thistles, and
it yields it produce with difficulty. Man must now
work by the sweat of his brow to obtain the good
fruit of the earth. Death has now entered into the
creation.
FIFTH STATE - AFTER THE FLOOD
Although the Scriptures state that God destroyed
the earth with the flood, it was not a destruction of
the order that occurred when Satan was judged. The
earth still existed under the flood waters, and when
the waters receded the earth brought forth its
produce once more. Also, we do not see God
creating man and the animals again after the flood,
for a remnant was preserved through the flood. Yet
the earth is distinctly changed.
Before the flood we are told that there was no rain,
but a mist rose from the earth to water the ground
(Genesis 2:6). After the flood there is rain. Prior to
the flood we see men living to great ages,
Methuselah being 969 years old at his death. After
the flood man’s lifespan is shortened to 120 years
(Genesis 6:3). This is the state of the earth that man
currently finds himself in.
SIXTH STATE - MILLENNIAL REIGN
In Revelation 20:2-7 we are told that in the coming
Millennial reign of Christ, Satan will be bound for
1,000 years. Isaiah speaks of this time.
Isaiah 65:20
"No longer will there be in it an infant who lives but
a few days, or an old man who does not live out his
days; for the youth will die at the age of one
hundred and the one who does not reach the age of
one hundred will be thought accursed."
Isaiah also gives us this insight:
Isaiah 11:6-8
And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the
leopard will lie down with the young goat, and the
calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and
a little boy will lead them. Also the cow and the bear
will graze, their young will lie down together, and
the lion will eat straw like the ox. The nursing child
will play by the hole of the cobra, and the weaned
child will put his hand on the viper's den.
This is a very different world from that which we
currently know, and it will exist for a thousand
years. At the end of the thousand years Satan will be
released once more for a short period and then he
will be judged a third time. The heavens and earth
will be consumed with fire and the last state of the
earth will be known.
SEVENTH STATE - THIRD EARTH
Revelation 21:1
Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the
former heaven and the former earth passed away,
and there is no longer any sea.
II Peter 3:13
But according to His promise we are looking for
new heavens and a new earth, in which
righteousness dwells.
What a glorious earth this will be! A unique aspect
of this final earth will be that there is no longer any
sea. The seas represent death throughout scriptures.
This is why God always used seas as a point of
demarcation. Passing through a sea was typical of
passing from one stage of life to another. Thus we
see the Israelites passing through the Red Sea,
leaving the bondage and fleshpots of Egypt behind
them. Even baptism in water today is symbolic of
being joined with Yahshua in His death and then
being resurrected to new life in Christ. There will be
no death in this final earth, and therefore it will
contain no seas.
What a magnificent design is revealed in these
things. We see that Yahweh has had a plan for the
earth and its inhabitants that is marked by the
fulness of the numbers three and seven. When we
"rightly divide the word of God" we see that all fits
according to the pattern Yahweh has established.
When we fail to rightly divide the word of God, then
the pattern is broken. Many multitudes of the saints
today are told that the entirety of the first chapter of
Genesis speaks of the original creation of the earth
and that Adam and Eve dwelt upon this original
earth. In holding to this wrong understanding they
break the patterns of God, for this would leave but
two creations of the earth, and it would know only
five stages. These numbers do not represent fulness
and completion.
We must interpret the scriptures correctly to
maintain the pattern of God. It is evident that seven
is a number representing fulness for God’s creation.
We see that He has chosen seven days to define the
creation and to bring it to a state of rest in Him. God
did not need seven days to create the earth. He could
have accomplished it in a single moment of time. He
chose seven days to define the creation for they fit
His perfect plan for the ages of the earth.
The numbers three and seven are foundational
numbers in all of God’s creation, and they are
reflections of His very being. God is Father, Son and
Spirit. He created man in His image, and man is
spirit and soul and body (I Thessalonians 5:23). Yet
we are also told that God has seven spirits.
Revelation 4:5
Out from the throne come flashes of lightning and
sounds and peals of thunder. And there were seven
lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are
the seven Spirits of God...
(In Isaiah 11:1, 2 we see these seven spirits defined.)
The student of the Bible will find that God has
imprinted these numbers everywhere throughout
creation. They serve as a testimony of His presence
and as a revelation of His magnificent design. When
we see the earth and its ages correctly we find that
they too bear this divine imprint.
Creation Versus Evolution
Before we go further in our look at God’s plan of the
ages, I feel it necessary to address the questions and
objections of those who have been taught the theory
of evolution. I have received correspondence from
different ones who objected to those things written
about in the previous chapter, for in teaching a
literal six days of creation, each twenty-four hours
in length, no room is left for evolutionary thought.
This has disturbed some who have been taught all
their lives that the theory of evolution is fully
supported by true science, and that to deny
evolution is tantamount to sticking one’s head in
the sand. Those who hold to a literal six days of
creation are often seen as backwards, superstitious,
unsophisticated, or intellectually dishonest.
Sadly, many saints have helped to encourage such
views by not understanding the Scriptures and
making statements that are inaccurate and
contradictory, both from a Biblical perspective and
a scientific perspective. It is difficult to argue
against the false assertions of science when one does
not even understand the Scriptures properly. True
science will always find a complete agreement with
the Scriptures, but one must "rightly divide the
word of God" or they will be found in the hopeless
situation of trying to reconcile science with a wrong
interpretation of Scripture.
I have been much more a student of the Bible than
a student of science. However, I am not unaware of
the teachings of science regarding evolution and
creation. Both in High School and in college I took
courses that taught the theory of evolution.
Particularly in college psychology and biology
courses I encountered this teaching.
I have found that many students have never
seriously looked at the claims of creationism.
Having only heard the evolutionary teaching of
public school systems and universities, they have no
doubt that what they have heard is true. Yet anyone
who desires to walk in truth must make an
investigation into all the evidence, both for and
against a matter. Solomon gives us these words:
Proverbs 18:17
The first to present his case seems right, till another
comes forward and questions him.
If a saint has an honest heart, he will desire to come
to the truth of a matter and to not simply stop at
what seems plausible. He will listen to witnesses
from both sides of a matter, and then he will ask the
Spirit to guide him to the truth. I have listened to
numerous witnesses from both sides of this issue. I
have sat under teachers of evolution, and I have
read writings both for and against it. I even had the
opportunity to attend a debate between a scientist
from the Institute for Creation Research, and a local
professor who was an evolutionist, while I was in
college. Beyond this, I have sought the scriptures to
see what they have to speak regarding this matter.
Having made what I consider to be a satisfactory
investigation, I have concluded that there is some
error in both camps, but the greater error is on the
side of evolution.
One would be wrong to think that those who are on
the side of evolution are all scientists, and those on
the side of creation are all theologians. There are
many scientists, both present and past, including
some of the most brilliant minds in science, who are
creationists. For a time I received the magazine
"Creation Ex Nihilo", and I found it to be filled with
examples of scientists who hold to a literal six days
of creation. On the other hand, there are also many
theologians who hold to the theory of evolution.
Some of these believe that the creation came about
through the processes described in evolutionary
theory, but that it was God’s hand that guided this
process.
We would be wrong, therefore, to depict this matter
as a debate between scientists and theologians.
Many theologians have adopted erroneous views of
Scripture, and many scientists have erroneous views
of science. Yet, when true theology and true science
come together, they are not set against one another,
but rather they are found to be in complete
harmony.
One error that has led many sheep into foul
pastures, is believing that one must bear the title of
scientist or theologian to understand these matters,
or to have their words bear real authority. Men tend
to be overly impressed with titles and with the
achievements of the flesh. The common man has as
much capacity to discern truth from error as those
who bear lofty titles. The apostle James spoke to
saints in this way:
James 1:5
If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who
gives to all generously and without reproach, and it
will be given to him.
Wisdom and understanding are not the exclusive
property of those trained in the university systems
of this world, of those who hold doctorates and who
are esteemed by man. Quite often the wisdom of the
wise turns out to actually be folly.
I Corinthians 1:19-20
For it is written, "I will destroy the wisdom of the
wise, and the cleverness of the clever I will set
aside." Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe?
Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made
foolish the wisdom of the world?
The same scientists, who are often accorded so
much honor, have given to man the name "homo
sapiens", which means "men of wisdom." This
should give us great cause to stop and consider
Paul’s words:
Romans 1:20-22
For since the creation of the world His invisible
attributes, His eternal power and divine nature,
have been clearly seen, being understood through
what has been made, so that they are without
excuse. For even though they knew God, they did
not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they
became futile in their speculations, and their foolish
heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they
became fools...
Anyone who studies the debate raging around
evolution will find that the loudest proponents of
evolution are often atheists who deny the very
existence of Yahweh. These men and women are
seeking a scientific solution that will allow them to
explain the creation around them without the
presence or necessity of God. These ones truly are
"futile in their speculations" and their foolish hearts
are darkened, to the extent that the light of truth
cannot enter. Paul tells us that these professors of
wisdom are fools, and Yahshua warns us with these
words:
Luke 6:39-40
He also told them this parable: "Can a blind man
lead a blind man? Will they not both fall into a pit?
A student is not above his teacher, but everyone
who is fully trained will be like his teacher."
If we become students of blind professors, we will
end up just like them. We must be very careful that
we follow only teachers that are walking in the light
of God. It should disturb the student of evolution to
find that so many of the leaders and founders of this
teaching were atheists, and men who had no respect
for Yahweh or the Scriptures. If these men could
look at the world and see no presence or proof of
God, then they will certainly end up leading many of
their students to the same conclusion.
Much has been written about creation, and many
scientists have given proofs that overturn the
teaching of evolution. I do not desire to duplicate
their work here. Let the serious student search these
matters out themself. As science has advanced,
there have been many attempts by sincere saints to
bring science and Scripture into harmony with one
another. However, not all science is true science.
Much that passes for science today is mere
hypothesis and theory, and beyond any doubt much
of it finds its origin in demonic sources. Sadly,
many Christians have tried to reconcile not only
true scientific teachings with the Bible, but they
have also sought to reconcile false science and
doctrines of demons with the Scriptures. The result
is always something that is abhorrent and which
leads the saints away from the discovery of truth.
Kenneth F. McKinley, in his book "Scanning the
Plan", has done a good job of summarizing many of
the prevailing interpretations of the Genesis
account, and I will quote from this book:
Much controversy and difference of opinion is
shared by scholars over the length of these days [6
days of creation]. Some consider them as geological
ages or aeons of time, while advocates of evolution
insist by their theories that man is at least 600,000
years old. According to present scientific views, the
earth is even older than that. Theories as to its
probable age range from two to ten billion years.
The evolutionist declares that man evolved from a
lower form of life, therefore he must necessarily
place the plant and animal kingdoms sufficiently
earlier to allow for this supposed development.
The question of time presents no problem to the
evolutionist. He juggles the periods of development
into any number of years he desires because he does
not accept the Biblical record of creation as literal or
authoritative. The Christian holding to the twenty-four
hour day is therefore placed in the position of
defending his views, which supposedly contradict
science, for if all of God’s creative act was
accomplished in six days with man as the final act,
then neither the earth nor man can be as old as the
present scientific views suggest.
Regardless of what system of chronology the Bible
student uses, he should be aware that more than
two hundred attempts have been made to compute
the earliest Biblical date. One of these attempts was
made by Bishop Ussher, an Irish clergyman whose
book "Annales Veteris et Novi Testamenti" was
published in 1650-1654. By adding the ages of
Adam and his descendants as recorded in Genesis 5
and 11, he computed the date of Adam to be 4004
B.C.. Known as the "short chronology", it has
become almost standard for many Christians...
It does not appear that the Bible allows for man to
be 600,000 or more years old. Even in view of such
evidence of compression of genealogies, it seems
safe to conclude, says Free, "that the creation of
man took place probably sometime between 4000
and 8000 B.C..."
True science and the Bible are not in conflict.
However, the problem of Biblical interpretation
does confront the student, for it may be possible to
envision long periods of time according to one view
and a literal twenty-four hour day according to
another. The following theories are man’s attempt
to see through the haze God has purposefully left in
regard to the beginning of His creation.
THE DAY-AGE THEORY
The advocates of this view regard Genesis 2:4 as
authority to make an age for a day when it states:
"These are the generations of the heavens and of the
earth when they were created, in the day that
Jehovah God made earth and heaven." (R.S.V.)
Because of the usage here of the word "day" in the
sense of a period of time, the days of creation are
taken to be as long in time as necessary for God to
complete His work. Some holding this view see
different lengths in the day because the events
described appear to indicate more time is needed in
one day than in another. For example, the creation
of light on the first day could have been
instantaneous, but the third day’s activity wherein
grass, herbs and trees came into being, seems to
suggest a longer period of time since Genesis 2:9
states that God "caused to grow" every tree. This is
understood to be a natural process. On the sixth
day, both animals and man are involved, plus the
fact that the animals were all brought to Adam to be
named.
Genesis 2:20 reveals Adam’s search for a mate
among the animal kingdom. When none is found,
God removes a rib from sleeping Adam to build a
woman. This activity suggests more time than a
regular twenty-four hour day will allow. So those
who see a problem here suggest enough time would
be permitted for the development of the earth, plant
life, fish, fowl, animals and man. The "day-age"
theory allows for this supposedly extra necessary
time. It allows for harmony between modern
geological theories which make the earth very old,
and time for the evolutionary development of man.
The danger here is that conservative theologians
who hold to this concept might be misunderstood
and classified as "theistic evolutionists."
A theistic evolutionist desires to make room for the
evolutionary hypothesis and at the same time give
God the credit for creating man. He allows for a
naturally explainable development of the body, but
finds no solution for the development of man’s
moral consciousness.
The more extreme trend would deny the literary
character of the historical narrative of Genesis,
chapters 1-2, thus bypassing the entire Biblical
record as to how man was created. The account is
accepted as mythological rather than literal. Any
concept of these Scriptures containing knowledge of
the physical processes of creation is rejected.
However, not all Christians holding the day-age
theory are to be classified as theistic evolutionists
because this view was held by some long before
Darwin’s time. In fact, this idea was advanced by
Josephus, the Jewish historian of the first century
A.D., by many rabbis, and by some early Christian
father’s, including Irenaeus (second century),
Origen (third century), and Augustine (fourth
century).
THE PROGRESSIVE CREATION THEORY
A Christian who rejects the modern theory of
evolution but who tries to allow for longer periods
of time in the creative days, is called a "Progressive
Creationist". This view is held by Bernard Ramm
who summarizes it as follows: "Almighty God is
Creator, World Ground, and Omnipotent Sustainer.
In His mind the entire plan of creation was formed
with man as the climax. Over millions of years of
geologic history, the earth was prepared for man’s
dwelling, or as it has been put by others, the cosmos
was pregnant with man. The vast forests grew and
decayed for his coal, that coal might appear a
natural product and not an artificial insertion in
nature. The millions of sea life were born and
perished for his oil. The surface of the earth was
weathered for his forests and valleys. From time to
time the great creative acts, "de novo", took place.
The complexity of animal forms increased. Finally,
when every river had cut its intended course, when
every mountain was in its purposed place, when
every animal was on earth according to blueprint,
then he whom all creation anticipated is made, in
whom alone is the breath of God."
Realizing that the Hebrew language will not permit
the use of the word "yom" (day), to be used in the
sense of an "epoch" or "age" Ramm rejects the day-age
theory and calls these days "pictorial revelatory"
days. While it took ages for God to prepare things
for man, it took Him only six days to reveal it to
Moses for recording.
Along with this conclusion, Ramm recognizes and
accepts "moderate concordism". This means that
Genesis and geology tell the same story in broad
outline. Both agree that the earth was once in what
may be called a chaotic condition. Both agree that
certain cosmical conditions had to be realized
before life could begin, e.g., the need for light, dry
land, separation of waters and atmosphere. Both
agree that the simple is first and the complex later
with higher animals and man being the last to
appear. Both agree that man is the latest and
highest of all forms of life. But they do not agree in
regard to the time record as stated in the book of
Genesis, if the account is to be taken literally. It is
either spiritualized or symbolized to mean other
than what it says in order to allow the geological
record to have the preeminence. Geological science
is thereby regarded as the supreme authority. The
Scriptures are relegated to second place. This
conclusion distorts the Biblical record and robs it of
its authority.
Science does not ordinarily throw light on the Bible.
Rather, the opposite is true. Whenever the Bible
touches on correct science, it illuminates and
supports correct science. Though the Bible is not a
treatise on science, whenever it touches science, it
must be regarded as accurate; because it is God’s
personal revelation of Himself and of His purposes
toward man...
THE APPEARANCE OF AGE THEORY
According to this view, the earth is very young. The
creation of earth was followed by plants, fish, birds,
insects, land animals and man during six literal
twenty-four hour days. No evolutionary process or
development time is necessary because God spoke
by divine fiat. Just as Jesus turned the water into
wine, thus bypassing natural processes, even so all
living things came into existence. Each was made
"full-grown" and placed in an environment already
adapted to it.
The soil had to be present for man to be made from
the dust or elements of the earth. Admitting that
soil requires a long period of preparation before
being able to support plant growth, those holding
this view interpret this process as having been
"instantly" created. Thus it had an appearance of
being old while it was still new. It was created with
an "appearance of age".
[end excerpt - pages 26-32 of "Scanning the Plan"]
These theories represent some of the attempts that
have been made to harmonize the Scriptures with
the views of science. I am not satisfied with any of
them, and only when I studied the Gap Theory,
which was put forth in the previous chapter, did I
come to a place of spiritual and intellectual rest.
(What was described in the previous chapter is
called the Gap Theory due to an understanding that
a gap occurs between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2.)
Many of the theories Mr. McKinley summarized
were devised as an attempt to reconcile
evolutionary teachings with Scripture. Such a
reconciliation is really unnecessary in light of the
omnipotent nature of God, for God is quite capable
of performing that which man views as miraculous
and that which defies all logical explanation. As we
approach this issue of creation from a Biblical
perspective we will see that there is no necessity laid
upon the saint to embrace evolutionary thought.
I will address one point of evolutionary thought,
which forms the entire basis upon which the theory
rests, and I will show that it not only contradicts
known laws of science, it also contradicts the
testimony of the word of God. The basic tenet upon
which evolution rests is that matter has for long
ages been progressing from simple forms of
arrangement to more complex forms. Thus we are
told that single cell organisms of the class Monera
have evolved to more complex multi-cell organisms
until now we have a plethora of advanced life forms
that each have very complex sensory systems,
digestive systems, respiration systems, reproductive
systems, and so on. From simplicity has come great
and astounding complexity.
Yet this tenet of evolution is neither reproducible,
nor does the evidence of the fossil record support it.
Very complex life forms have been found in what
are supposed to be the earliest layers of geologic
strata, and very simple forms are still with us today.
There has always been a mixture of such forms,
which is in keeping with an understanding of
creation. Furthermore, this tenet of evolution
contradicts known laws of science.
The second law of thermodynamics proclaims that
all systems are in a state of increasing entropy. That
is, all systems naturally are going from states of
higher complexity, to lower. This is a law. It is
proven and easily reproducible. Following is an
example that is frequently given.
If we took a stack of building material, and we
included everything necessary to build a complete
house and then set these materials on a vacant lot,
according to the theory of evolution if enough time
is allowed, eventually these materials will arrange
themselves into a more complex form. Eventually
they will form a house. Time and chance seem to be
the two things evolutionists rely upon the most.
They might say that you would actually have to
perform this experiment billions of times and allow
long ages to pass, but eventually something of
higher complexity will arise.
On the other hand, the second law of
thermodynamics states that, given this same stack
of building materials, these materials will not
advance to a higher order of complexity, but rather
they will descend to a lower order of complexity.
This law would tell us that these materials would
decay and crumble into dust and rubble. We can
prove this law ourselves any time we desire and we
will always get the same result. The scriptures also
support this law.
Psalms 102:25-26
"Of old You founded the earth, and the heavens are
the work of Your hands. Even they will perish, but
You endure; and all of them will wear out like a
garment; like clothing You will change them and
they will be changed."
Of old Yahweh founded the earth, but it is wearing
out. It is not advancing to higher complexity, but
rather descending to a lower order. Students of
evolution are given many examples of changes
taking place among certain living organisms, such
as a moth changing its color, or a horse increasing
in size, or man changing in some physical
characteristic such as skin color or height. Yet all of
the changes that are observable today are not
changes to a higher order of complexity. They are
merely horizontal changes. A moth may change
colors, but it is still a moth. A horse may increase in
size, but it is still a horse. These things have not
changed to a higher form of life. To do so would
defy natural laws and the Scriptures.
Consider for a moment all the effort that man
expends to keep the things he has built from falling
into decay. Man might build an impressive bridge,
but as soon as it is constructed it begins to show
signs of decay. On some bridges crews work without
end painting and stripping away rust, and then
painting again. Bolts must be replaced, the
structure monitored closely for signs of wear. The
same is especially true for the things man has
created that have moving parts. An automobile, a
ship, an airplane must all undergo constant repair
and maintenance or they would soon no longer
function.
If you have ever owned a house you know that if a
house is left unattended and no maintenance is
done to it, very soon it will fall apart. Our cities are
full of neighborhoods that contain once impressive
homes that are now in decay and often abandoned
as unlivable. The trend everywhere in creation is
toward death and decay. This is the awful result of
the sin of man. With sin came the curse, and all of
creation groans under this curse.
The creationist viewpoint states that initially God
created everything perfect. After each day of
creation it is recorded that God declared, "and it
was good." Things began perfect. But with the
entrance of sin into the creation, things began to go
downhill. There are environmental groups that tell
us that hundreds of life forms become extinct every
year. This is evolution in reverse. The world is losing
its complexity rather than gaining it.
I suppose that the reason so many Christians allow
themselves to embrace evolution is that they feel
that the teaching of creation, as recorded in the first
chapter of Genesis, lacks sophistication. They also
look at all the evidence for the existence of
dinosaurs and past ice ages and they cannot
reconcile these things with a world that is only
6,000 years old. Much of the failure to be able to
place these events is due to the wrong teaching of
scriptures and a failure to understand the ages of
the earth. Once one discerns these things correctly,
then dinosaurs, ice ages, and an ancient earth no
longer cause problems.
When professors of evolution pull out their
textbooks and they read all the scenarios that
evolutionists depict regarding the advance of matter
to higher forms over a duration of billions of years,
it seems naive to simply believe that God made all of
these things in six days. Not wanting to appear
scientifically ignorant, many saints have found ways
to merge evolutionary teaching with the account of
Genesis, but whenever they do this they do violence
to the word of God.
One of the arguments for theistic evolution
contends that the days in Genesis chapter one are
actually age-days. The scriptures actually do use a
day in a symbolic sense in many instances where the
day represents a longer amount of time than
twenty-four hours. In Bible prophecy a day often
represents a year, as in Ezekiel.
Ezekiel 4:4-5
"As for you, lie down on your left side and lay the
iniquity of the house of Israel on it; you shall bear
their iniquity for the number of days that you lie on
it. For I have assigned you a number of days
corresponding to the years of their iniquity, three
hundred and ninety days; thus you shall bear the
iniquity of the house of Israel."
At times it can even represent a thousand years.
II Peter 3:8
But do not let this one fact escape your notice,
beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a
thousand years, and a thousand years like one day.
Theistic evolutionists would have to stretch this day
representation much farther. They would have each
day represent millions of years, and each day would
not necessarily be the same length. Yet the Genesis
account gives us the boundaries of each day.
Genesis 1:3-5
Then God said, "Let there be light"; and there was
light. God saw that the light was good; and God
separated the light from the darkness. God called
the light day, and the darkness He called night. And
there was evening and there was morning, one day.
Genesis 1:8
God called the expanse heaven. And there was
evening and there was morning, a second day.
Genesis 1:13
There was evening and there was morning, a
third day.
Genesis 1:19
There was evening and there was morning, a
fourth day.
Genesis 1:23
There was evening and there was morning, a
fifth day.
Genesis 1:31
God saw all that He had made, and behold, it was
very good. And there was evening and there was
morning, the sixth day.
First God defines the terms evening and morning,
and then He tells us that each day of creation was
"evening" and "morning", one day. If God had not
given us this information, and then carefully
repeated it after speaking about the activity of each
day of creation, then we might suppose that these
days were not literal days defined by evening and
morning. But this information has been given to us.
Watchman Nee, in the book "The Mystery of
Creation" shares this:
"Suppose we were to take the Six Days as six long
geological periods. What, then, would be "the
evening" of these geologic periods and what would
be "the morning"? Before the third geologic period
there would be no grass nor trees on the earth.
Before the sixth geologic period, there could be no
fossils of animals. The fact is that there is no
distinction of plants and animals to be found in the
earth’s strata...
We have absolutely no need to agree with the theory
of the unregenerated. We know that what geology
(if it is correct in its assumptions) demands can be
met sufficiently during the period which lasted
between the time of the first verse and that of the
second verse of Genesis 1." (see here)
Let us then ask, "Why does the saint need to
embrace the theory of evolution?" The saint does
not need to embrace it to explain the geologic age of
the earth, for the Scriptures plainly allow for a great
age. The saint need not embrace evolution to
explain the time period in which dinosaurs existed.
The saint cannot say that the days were more than
evening and morning without doing violence to the
word of God. We must then ask, "Is it really so
incredible that God could create all that is
mentioned in literal twenty-four hour periods?"
If we begin to bow to the pressure of the unbelieving
and we begin to seek a natural explanation for
everything in Scripture, where will it stop? Consider
how long evolutionary theory tells us that it would
take for the development of an organ such as the eye
to develop. Evolution teaches that it takes millions
of years for such a sophisticated organ to develop
with all of its attending components and links to the
brain. Yet scripture reveals this:
John 9:1, 6-7
As He passed by, He saw a man blind from birth...
[Yahshua] spat on the ground, and made clay of the
spittle, and applied the clay to his eyes, and said to
him, "Go, wash in the pool of Siloam" (which is
translated, Sent). So he went away and washed, and
came back seeing.
Luke 18:35-43
As Yahshua was approaching Jericho, a blind man
was sitting by the road begging... And he called out,
saying, "Yahshua, Son of David, have mercy on
me..." And Yahshua stopped and commanded that
he be brought to Him; and when he came near, He
questioned him, "What do you want Me to do for
you?" And he said, "Lord, I want to regain my
sight!" And Yahshua said to him, "Receive your
sight; your faith has made you well." Immediately
he regained his sight...
In these events recorded in the gospels we see
Yahshua performing creative acts. He heals two
blind men, one of which has been blind from birth.
The healing does not take days, months, years, or
ages. They are healed that very day, following the
command spoken by Yahshua.
It took Yahshua but a moment of time to make a
blind man see. Even if the blind man had gone to a
modern hospital there would have been a time of
treatment, recuperation and training, but Christ’s
creative act was immediate. Should we doubt this
miracle of Christ because it lacks scientific
explanation? Should we say, "Well, this scripture
actually means that this man was healed days,
months, or years later, and Yahshua told this man to
go do something natural that brought forth his
healing?" No. We do not need science to explain this
event. It was a creative act of God, it was immediate
and supernatural. Let us look at another example.
Mark 3:3-5
He said to the man with the withered hand, "Get up
and come forward!" And He said to them, "Is it
lawful to do good or to do harm on the Sabbath, to
save a life or to kill?" But they kept silent. After
looking around at them with anger, grieved at their
hardness of heart, He said to the man, "Stretch out
your hand." And he stretched it out, and his hand
was restored.
Here is a man with a limb that is withered. I have
seen such examples where the hand is all bent in on
itself. The muscles are atrophied. The tendons and
ligaments do not function properly. The hand is
completely useless. Yet Christ restored it in one
creative moment in time. He did not wait for the
hand to evolve. He did not allow a natural amount of
time for the muscles to be exercised and regain
strength and the bones to straighten out. He did a
supernatural thing. What would have taken an
extended amount of time to occur in the natural,
happened in an instant with God.
We might also consider Christ’s first miracle of
turning the water into wine. How long would it take
for water to change into wine if we allowed for all the
time and chance necessary? Maybe a grape vine
would grow up over the jar of water if enough time
were allowed and the grapes would fall into the jar
and begin to ferment. Yet I do not think we would
get a quality of wine that would make a wedding
steward remark that the best wine had been saved
for last.
We could also consider the accounts of Christ
raising a dead man up to life, as He did on more
than one occasion. If we left all the corpses in the
world unburied, and we allowed them all the time
and chance of billions of years, how many would
come back to life. I dare say that none of them
would. Only a miraculous creative act of God could
perform such a thing.
If we allow for all of these things, incredible as they
are, to be done in a moment of time by God, then
why stumble over the fact that He could create the
world in six days. I tell you He did not even need six
days. He could have done it with one word. Such is
the power of God. Yet He chose six days because it
fit with the plan that He had devised in His own
mind for the ages of creation. Each day was a
prophecy in itself, and much could be written about
what each day represented.
There is much that is marvelous in the Scriptures. It
is interesting that so many Christians feel compelled
to acknowledge "the theories of the unregenerate"
that speak of the origin of the earth, yet they do not
feel the necessity to acquiesce on other matters that
are just as phenomenal. Consider, for example, the
virgin birth of Christ. Multitudes of saints accept
that the virgin birth was a supernatural act of God,
and they feel no compulsion to explain it through
natural means. The resurrection of Yahshua is
another good example. It is the unbelievers that
seek to give some natural explanation of such
events, such as the foolish theory that states that
Christ was not completely dead when laid in the
tomb, and the coolness of the tomb revived Him. As
believers, we accept that Yahweh did something
miraculous that goes beyond natural
understanding.
Certainly an unbelieving world will scoff at such
things, and treat them as mere superstition and
myth. An unbelieving world may consider the saint
to be weak minded for believing things that cannot
be explained naturally, yet we are part of a kingdom
that transcends the natural. We might as well try to
explain the existence of angels and heaven through
natural science. But there is really no reason to do
so. Those who scoff at the things taught in Scripture
will continue to scoff no matter how much evidence
is presented to them. Those who believe will not
require natural explanations of the works of a
supernatural God.
For those who are concerned about the teaching of
a literal six days of creation and its contradiction to
the claims of evolution, I would encourage you to
thoroughly examine all sides of the issue. There are
many excellent resources available. Ask the Spirit of
God to guide you into truth in this matter. You will
find that evolution has no killer argument that
destroys the account of Genesis when it is correctly
understood. True science is fully harmonious with
the Scriptures, for the Bible and the creation have
the same Author.
‘Summing Up’ in Christ
Ephesians 3:8-11
To me, less than the least of all saints, was granted
this grace: to bring the good news of the
unsearchable riches of Christ to the nations, and to
enlighten all as to what is the stewardship of the
mystery, which has been concealed from the ages in
God, Who creates all, that now may be made known
to the principalities and the powers among the
heaven s, through the congregation, the manifold
wisdom of God, in accord with the plan of the ages,
which He made in the anointed Yahshua our Lord.
In his letter to the Ephesians Paul writes that God,
before the beginning of time, established by His
own counsel a plan of the ages. This plan was
hidden to the principalities and powers in the
heavenly realms, and only with the advent of the
church age has this plan been declared. However,
the church of these latter days has little understood
this plan, and to most there is not even a knowledge
that such a plan exists.
During the time of the early church, this plan of the
ages was preached and understood, and it was made
known to principalities and powers among the
heaven s. Paul gives us a further identification of
these principalities and powers later in this same
letter to the Ephesian believers.
Ephesians 6:12
For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but
against principalities, against powers, against the
rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual
hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.
There is no doubt that some of these angels and
spiritual forces of wickedness in high places were
not pleased by what was revealed to them. Satan
thought that he had won the ultimate victory over
Yahweh by inciting the Jewish people to kill the Son
of God. What a jolt it had to have been when he
realized that the cross of Christ became the
instrument through which all things, whether in
heaven, or on earth, would be reconciled to God.
The plan that had been hidden from them, now was
manifested. Rebellion would one day cease. All
things would be reconciled to God. Every knee
would bow and every tongue would confess that
Yahshua the Messiah is Lord to the glory of God the
Father.
What Satan had thought to be his greatest victory,
now stood as his ultimate defeat. He too would one
day bow the knee and worship before Yahshua. Not
until after the resurrection did the principalities and
powers understand how Yahweh would bring an end
to rebellion and reconcile all of creation to Himself.
By the blood of Christ atonement was made, and by
His blood every enemy was destroyed. The blood of
Christ is Satan’s undoing, his ultimate defeat.
Revelation 12:10-11
Then I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying, "Now
the salvation, and the power, and the kingdom of
our God and the authority of His Christ have come,
for the accuser of our brethren has been thrown
down, he who accuses them before our God day and
night. And they overcame him because of the
blood of the Lamb and because of the word of
their testimony..."
When Satan enticed Adam to sin a breach was made
between God and man. Because Yahweh is holy, sin
cannot abide in His presence. Access into Yahweh’s
presence was now prohibited. Even as the cherubim
were stationed outside the Garden of Eden to deny
man access, so access into the Holy of Holies in
heaven was now forbidden. This was Satan’s
triumph. He had separated the creation from
Yahweh and as long as sin existed, so would the
penalty of separation. Little did Satan realize that
Yahweh had already established a plan before the
creation of the heavens and the earth, where He
would repair the breach between Himself and the
creation, and remove the enmity that existed
between God and man. His plan was beyond
comprehension. He would pour out the blood of His
own Son as an atonement.
Hebrews 9:22
And according to the law almost all things are
purified with blood, and without shedding of blood
there is no remission of sins.
The principalities and powers could not conceive
that Yahweh would go to such lengths to redeem His
creation. Blinded by their pride and rebellion they
did not understand the depths of humility and love
in God. Satan thought He was triumphing over God
by inciting the Jewish leaders to kill Yahshua. He
thought he was achieving a great victory in his war
of rebellion. He did not understand that Yahshua
laid His life down freely, and that no one took it
from Him.
John 10:17-18
"For this reason the Father loves Me, because I lay
down My life so that I may take it again. No one
takes it away from Me, but I lay it down on My own
initiative. I have authority to lay it down, and I have
authority to take it up again. This commandment I
received from My Father."
For this reason Yahshua came, to repair the breach
between God and His creation. Only by the
shedding of blood could the breach be repaired.
What Satan intended for evil in enticing man to sin
in the Garden, became the choicest opportunity for
God to demonstrate the surpassing greatness of His
love for man.
Romans 5:8
But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in
that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
How very much is bound up in this one verse! God
demonstrates His love toward us! He did not spare
His own Son. Such was His love for us. His love
knows no bounds. He did not withhold His own Son
in whom He delighted, but freely gave Him up for
us. What an unfathomable love, a love past finding
out!
The greatest sacrifice of God, the shed blood of His
Son, has become the key to victory over the
adversary. Satan no longer holds men in the
bondage of sin, for sin has been atoned for. The
separation between God and man has been
amended. The veil in the Temple separating the
Holy of Holies from mankind was rent in two from
top to bottom at the moment of Christ’s death.
Access into the Holy of Holies in heaven is now
open to all who enter through the shed blood of the
Lamb of God.
Hebrew s 9:12
Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His
own blood He entered the Most Holy Place once for
all, having obtained eternal redemption.
Hebrews 10:19-20
Therefore, brethren, having boldness to enter the
Holiest by the blood of Yahshua, by a new and living
way which He consecrated for us, through the veil,
that is, His flesh...
All throughout the book of Ephesians Paul speaks of
the plan of the ages that God has now revealed
through the congregation of believers. This plan is
manifested through the congregation of believers to
the principalities and powers, when it had been
hidden in previous ages. At the beginning of this
epistle to the congregation in Ephesus Paul speaks
of this plan that was formerly a mystery, a hidden
thing.
Ephesians 1:9-10
He made known to us the mystery of His will,
according to His kind intention which He purposed
in Him with a view to an administration suitable to
the fullness of the times, that is, the summing up
of all things in Christ, things in the heavens
and things on the earth, in Him.
Paul expresses the mystery that is now unveiled in
this way, it is "the summing up of all things in
Christ, things in the heavens and things on the
earth, in Him." As we examine Paul’s declaration of
this mystery to the saints in the book of Ephesians,
and elsewhere, we are able to precisely identify what
"all things" includes. Paul doesn’t leave us any room
to doubt.
I Corinthians 15:24-28
Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom
to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule
and all authority and power. For He must reign till
He has put all enemies under His feet. The last
enemy that will be destroyed is death. For "He has
put all things under His feet." But when He says "all
things are put under Him," it is evident that He who
put all things under Him is excepted. Now when all
things are made subject to Him, then the Son
Himself will also be subject to Him who put all
things under Him, that God may be all in all.
Paul states in his letter to the Ephesians that a
"stewardship of the mystery" has been entrusted to
him. Thus we see him explaining this mystery to the
Corinthians as well as the Ephesians. To the
Ephesians he writes that all things in heaven and on
earth will be summed up in Christ, and in his letter
to the Corinthians he clarifies this by saying that
there is one thing in heaven that will not be
summed up, and that is the Father, for it is the
Father who is working to sum up all things in
Christ. When all things are summed up then
Yahshua will Himself also be subject to Him.
There is absolutely nothing left out of this summing
up in Christ, other than the Father. Paul does not
tell us that Satan will be excluded. He does not tell
us that wicked men will be excluded. He says "all
things are put under Him" with the single exception
of the Father. Thus we will see the fulfillment of
Yahweh’s emphatic declaration in Isaiah:
Isaiah 45:22-24
"Look to Me, and be saved, all you ends of the earth!
For I am God, and there is no other. I have sworn by
Myself; the word has gone out of My mouth in
righteousness, and shall not return, that to Me every
knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear allegiance.
They shall say, ‘Surely in Yahweh I have
righteousness and strength.’ To Him men shall
come, and all shall be ashamed who are incensed
against Him.
For those who have been taught that this bowing
down of those who were enemies of God will be
done under compulsion, I ask you to examine this
passage carefully. We are told that "all shall be
ashamed who are incensed against Him." The
rebellious are not ashamed of their anger against
God. Only when rebellion ceases and a heart is
contrite before God is a person ashamed of their
actions. Also, look at the declaration these will
make, "Surely in Yahweh I have righteousness and
strength." This is not a statement born of a
rebellious heart. All those who formerly said that
Yahweh was not their strength, but who boasted in
their own strength, will now confess that He alone
is strength. All those who denied that Yahweh was
their righteousness will declare that He is indeed
their righteousness, and they will be ashamed of
ever having denied it.
This breaking will come hard for those who resist
the grace of God. Yet they will be broken. Yahweh
will not allow rebellion to continue forever. Some
get the idea that this confession of Christ’s lordship
will be under compulsion from the expressions used
in the passages we are looking at. Paul states:
Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom
to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule
and all authority and power. For He must reign
till He has put all enemies under His feet.
The last enemy that will be destroyed is
death. For "He has put all things under His
feet."
The expressions here are those that relate to a foe
who has been conquered. Men would place their
foot on the neck of an enemy who had been
defeated. Satan has already been defeated, as have
all of the principalities and powers with him.
Colossians 2:15-16
Having disarmed principalities and powers, He
made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over
them...
Satan knows he is defeated. He knows he has but a
little time left. At this time he is still kicking against
the goads. He is still rebelling and resisting. Like a
caged animal that knows he has been trapped, yet
which still snarls viciously at all who approach, he
remains defiant in his defeat. Yet a day will come
when he will bow the knee, having been thoroughly
broken, and as an enemy whose neck is under the
foot of the victor, he will rebel no more. Satan will
not come to this breaking voluntarily, but he will be
broken. His rebellion will cease and he will declare
that Yahshua is his Lord to the glory of God the
Father.
We can see this with added clarity as we look again
at Paul’s expression to the Ephesians.
Ephesians 1:9-10
He made known to us the mystery of His will,
according to His kind intention which He purposed
in Him with a view to an administration suitable to
the fullness of the times, that is, the summing up
of all things in Christ, things in the heavens
and things on the earth, in Him.
As we compare the passages in Ephesians and I
Corinthians that speak of the mystery that has been
hidden from the ages, we can gain much
understanding. To the church in Ephesus Paul
describes the end of God’s plan of the ages as
resulting in "the summing up of all things in
Christ." To the Corinthians he expresses this same
consummation of the end of the ages as "all things
are made subject to Him." These phrases are
speaking of the same concept. The summing up of
all things in Christ is the same as all things being
made subject to Christ.
Paul says that all things in heaven and earth will be
"summed up" in Christ. This includes Satan and the
principalities and powers with him. This expression
"summed up", or "summing up" occurs only two
places in the New Testament. As we compare
Scriptures we can learn something about the
character of this summing up, whether it is
voluntary, or forced. Following is the other
occurrence of this expression in the New Testament.
Romans 13:9
For the commandments, "You shall not commit
adultery," "You shall not murder," "You shall not
steal," "You shall not bear false witness," "You shall
not covet," and if there is any other commandment,
are all summed up in this saying, namely, "You
shall love your neighbor as yourself."
The word used in both verses, and only in these two
verses, is "anakephalaiomai". Strong’s Dictionary of
Greek and Hebrew words defines it in the following
manner:
NT:346
anakephalaiomai (an-ak-ef-al-ah'-ee-om-ahee);
from NT:303 and NT:2775 (in its original sense); to
sum up:
When we look at the two root words from which this
single Greek word is derived, we find that the
expression "to sum up" is a very good rendering.
NT:303
ana (an-ah'); a primary preposition and adverb;
properly, up;
NT:2774
kephalaion (kef-al'-ah-yon); neuter of a derivative of
NT:2776; a principal thing, i.e. main point;
specially, an amount (of money): KJV - sum.
In Ephesians, Christ is the ‘principal thing’, the
‘main point’ that all other things will be
encompassed in. In Romans, the law "You shall love
your neighbor as yourself" is the ‘principal thing’, the
‘main point’ that encompasses and describes all the
other laws. When Paul says that the commandments
can be all summed up in "You shall love your
neighbor as yourself" he is expressing the idea that
all of the commandments find their highest
expression in this one command. None of the other
commands violate this one command in any way. If
they violated this command to love your neighbor as
yourself, then they could not rightly be said to be
summed up in this command. All the other
commands must be in complete harmony and
agreement with this greatest of commands.
This is a very important point. This expression that
is only found in two places in the New Testament
holds the same meaning in both occurrences. If all
of the commands that are summed up in this one
command must be in harmony with this greatest of
commands, then so too must all things that are
summed up in Christ be in harmony with Christ.
Even as none of the individual commands can
violate or stand in opposition to the great command
and still be summed up in it, none of the creation
can violate or stand in opposition to Christ and be
summed up in Him. We can see this more plainly as
we examine what this expression "summed up"
originally meant.
The expression "summed up" doesn’t make very good
sense to us today, for when we do sums, we do them
down, not up. We place the sum at the bottom of
our figures. However, the Romans added all of the
figures from bottom to top, and they placed the sum
at the very top of the list of numbers being summed.
They literally "summed up." When we look at the
etymology for our English word "sum" we find that
it came from the Latin practice of "summing up".
The "Arcade Dictionary of Word Origins" gives us
this understanding of the word "sum ".
SUM - Latin summus meant ‘highest’ (a meaning
preserved in the English word summit...); it evolved
from earlier supmus, a superlative form based on
the stem of the Latin super ‘above’. When the
Romans counted up columns of figures they worked
from the bottom upwards, and put the total on the
top - whence the use of the expression res summa,
literally ‘highest thing ’...
What an appropriate expression this is for that
which Paul is speaking of to the saints. Everything
below Christ will be summed up in Christ. He will
then be the undisputed "highest thing ". He will be
the total of all creation. What a twisted world we
live in where we now put the sum and total at the
bottom of the lesser items being summed, when it
rightfully should be the top and head.
Can any being of creation be summed up in Christ
and yet be in rebellion? As we consider this we can
only answer "No!" If all things are to add up to
Christ, then all things must be some portion of
Christ. Let me say this again, "If all things are to
add up to Christ, then all things must be
some portion of Christ." All rebellion must be
removed before this summing up can occur. All sin
must be completely dealt with. Nothing can be left
in all of creation except that which resembles Christ.
Christ is not rebellion. Therefore, all those things
being summed up in Christ must be free of
rebellion. They can bear only His character. If the
"all things in heaven, and on earth" being summed
up resembled anything other than Christ, then the
sum would not be Christ. When we do sums in
math, we understand that every number being
added is a portion of the total. In the same way,
everything being summed up in Christ must be a
portion of Christ. Even as there is no aspect of the
laws that are summed up in the great law of
Romans 13:9 that is contradictory to the great law,
so there can be no aspect of that which is summed
up in Christ that is contrary to Christ. All rebellion
will be thoroughly dealt with and purged before all
things are summed up in Christ.
How perfectly harmonious the Scriptures are! Now
we can declare with assurance that when the word
of God is fulfilled that states that every knee will
bow, and every tongue will swear allegiance to
Christ, that those doing the bowing and declaring
will not do so with rebellion in their hearts. This is
the fulness of the glorious gospel of Christ! The day
will come when nothing in creation is left that
opposes Christ. All creation will enter into the
Sabbath rest of God.
The Hidden Ages
The concept in the minds of myriads of believers
through the years, and especially in this day, is that
there exists a single age of man, and no age has
existed beyond the 6,000 years of Bible history, and
that which follows this age is not an age at all, but it
is defined as eternity in heaven. This is a very
nearsighted viewpoint and it finds no agreement or
support within the Scriptures. It is very much like
man to view his own experience as the only thing
that matters, and to be cognizant of nothing beyond
his own small vantage point.
For many years it was the prevailing thought that
the Earth was the center of the universe and that all
things revolved around the Earth. When certain
astronomers began to observe that this was not the
case at all, that not only was the Earth not the
center of the universe, but it wasn’t even the center
of the Solar System, they met with the full wrath of
a self-centered church. Some were branded as
heretics and excommunicated, and some were even
put to death due to their assertions.
Today there is little argument that the astronomers
were indeed correct, but man has continued in his
self-centered understanding of creation and of the
ultimate plan of God. Though the church today may
not proclaim that all things revolve around the
Earth, the church does view the Earth, and the age
we exist in, as being of primary importance, if not
the only age that has ever existed and held
importance.
The Scriptures actually have much to say about
God’s plan of the ages. We have already seen that
this earth will know three creations and seven
distinct states. There are still ages in God’s plan to
come that must pass before all is summed up in
Christ. Unfortunately, nearly all of the currently
popular English Bibles were translated in such a
manner as to obscure, hide, and even nullify the
existence of these ages and God’s plan for them.
The reader should understand that it is not possible
to translate the Scriptures without interpretation,
that is, without man’s thoughts concerning the
subject entering in. To translate means to "carry
over". When the Scriptures are carried over from
one language to another they cannot be carried over
in a strictly literal sense. Even with a Bible that bills
itself as a ‘literal translation’, those who labor on it
must decide what word in English best correlates to
the original language, and this demands that the
understanding of the translators be called upon.
All languages are unique. Even within one language
a single word can carry many different shades of
meaning and it is often impossible to find a word in
another language that will carry the same shades
and diversities of meaning. For example, the
English word ‘love’ could refer to having an affinity
for some object, such as "I love chocolate." It could
refer to having a strong affection for another
person, as in "I love my son." It could also refer to
the act of sexual intercourse, as in "They made
love." It might even refer to a score in the game of
tennis as in "The score was love - 30."
The translator must understand the context and
usage of a word in order to choose the proper word
to represent it in another language. Unless the
translator clearly understands the subject matter at
hand, he can easily come to a wrong, or distorted
interpretation. This has been the case in many
instances as the Scriptures have been translated
into English.
The particular case in point of the mystery of God
that was hidden from previous ages is simply one
example of such misunderstanding. Because the
translators have not understood God’s plan of the
ages, they have interpreted and rendered words in
such a way as to obscure their true meaning. Let us
look at a Scripture to see this illustrated. First
we will show it in some of the most popular
translations of the day.
Ephesians 3:8-11
Although I am less than the least of all God's people,
this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles
the unsearchable riches of Christ, and to make plain
to everyone the administration of this mystery,
which for AGES [aionoon] past was kept hidden in
God, who created all things. His intent was that
now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of
God should be made known to the rulers and
authorities in the heavenly realms, according to his
ETERNAL [aionoon] purpose which he
accomplished in Christ Jesus our Lord.
(NIV)
Ephesians 3:8-11
Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is
this grace given, that I should preach among the
Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; and to
make all men see what is the fellowship of the
mystery, which from the BEGINNING OF THE
WORLD [aionoon] hath been hid in God, who
created all things by Jesus Christ: to the intent that
now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly
places might be known by the church the manifold
wisdom of God, according to the ETERNAL
[aionoon] purpose which he purposed in Christ
Jesus our Lord:
(KJV)
We see in these two popular translations that the
Greek word "aionoon" has been rendered in three
different ways within four occurrences. Not only are
these renderings different, but they also are
conflicting. This one word has been translated to
mean:
ages
eternal
beginning of the world
We know that an age is something that has both a
beginning and an end. It is a measure of time.
However, eternal is outside of time. Eternity has no
beginning or end. This word cannot mean both of
these things. What is the true meaning of this Greek
word that has been rendered in these various ways?
The root of the word is "aion" from which we get our
English word "eon", or "aeon". In English this word
means "an age", and we will see that this is also
what it means in the Greek language. It is used to
denote a span of time that has limits, both a
beginning and an ending.
The translators of these popular Bibles interpreted
this word either according to their understanding,
or according to the tradition established by earlier
translators. Let us look at how it is rendered in
some lesser known Bibles that have sought to bring
forth a more literal translation.
Ephesians 3:8-11
And to cause all to see what is the fellowship of the
secret that has been hid FROM THE AGES
[aionoon] in God, who the all things did create by
Jesus Christ, that there might be made known now
to the principalities and authorities in the heavenly
places, through the assembly, the manifold wisdom
of God, according to A PURPOSE OF THE AGES
[aionoon], which He made in Christ Jesus our Lord.
(Young's Literal Translation)
Ephesians 3:8-11
To me the far inferior of all holy ones; was given the
favor this, among the nations to announce glad
tidings the unsearchable wealth of the Anointed,
and to enlighten all, what the administration of the
secret of that having been hidden from the AGES
[aionoon] in the God in that the all things having
created; so that might be made known now to the
governments and to the authorities in the
heavenlies, through the congregation, the manifold
wisdom of the God; According to A PLAN OF THE
AGES [aionoon], which He formed for the Anointed
Jesus our Lord. (Diaglott)
Ephesians 3:8-11
Unto me—the less than least of all saints, was given
this favour, unto the nations, to announce the glad-
message of the untraceable riches of the Christ, and
to bring to light—what is the administration of the
sacred secret which had been hidden away from the
AGES [aionoon] in God, who did all things create:
In order that now, unto the principalities and the
authorities in the heavenlies, might be made known,
through means of the assembly, the manifold
wisdom of God,— According to A PLAN OF THE
AGES [aionoon] which He made in the anointed
Jesus our Lord. (Rotherham)
The meaning of this word is rendered much more
plainly in these translations than in the more
popular ones. Rather than being confused with
"eternal" and "the beginning of the world", we have
a much clearer and consistent rendering. Paul is
speaking of God making known through him and
through the Church His plan of the ages.
In examining the current mishmash of views
concerning the ages and eternity, one is not
surprised that translators came to many different
conclusions in interpreting these passages. In the
church at large, there is very little understanding of
the ages. Solomon stated, "knowledge is easy to him
who has understanding" (Proverbs 14:6). When one
understands the concept at hand, knowledge is
much easier to come by. Because the translators of
the most popular Bibles did not understand the
concept of the ages of God, or because they wanted
to hold to current tradition, they strained at
bringing forth a consistent and accurate translation.
In the last chapter we read that Paul has declared
that through the congregation of saints the mystery
of God’s plan of the ages has now been made known
to principalities and powers. Yet we know that
Satan and those angels who joined with him are in
rebellion against this plan. They do not want to
acknowledge that they too will bow the knee before
Christ, and they too will confess that Yahshua
Messiah is Lord to the glory of God the Father. It is
Satan’s current contention that he will never bow
down to Christ.
Consider what Satan has done in obscuring the
message of the ultimate reconciliation of the
creation. He has caused to be set in the minds of
believers everywhere the notion that he will hold
rebellion in his heart forever, that he will never let
go of his defiance. Satan would rather have the
saints believe that he will be cast into an eternal lake
of fire where he will remain the enemy of God for all
time, than to admit that he too will one day
acknowledge his shame in having defied Yahweh. As
long as he can remain defiant then there is no
admission of sin on his part.
We have seen in the previous chapter, however, that
all things will eventually be summed up in Christ.
All things will be subject to Yahshua, with only one
exception, that being the Father Himself. Satan’s
defiance will end. Yet at this time he is in defiance
of this truth, unwilling to admit it to the church, and
he has done a masterful job of removing this
understanding from the Scriptures as he has led
Bible translators to alter the understanding of words
through wrong translations.
God’s plan of the ages has yet to be completed.
When the plan is complete there will be no more
death, no more hell (the place of torment) and
everything in heaven and in the Earth will be
reconciled to God. When the plan is complete, time
itself will be done away with and everything will be
summed up in God the Father until He is all in all.
Many will say at this point, "How can this be? We
have been taught that Satan and the wicked will be
cast into the Lake of Fire forever and ever. Our
scriptures clearly declare this. How can all things be
reconciled to God and yet these remain in the Lake
of Fire for eternity?" The answer is, "They can’t."
Someone has erred in their interpretation and
translation of scriptures. In every case where these
things are spoken of and they are rendered
"eternity", or "forever and ever", the Greek word
"aion", or a form of it, has been wrongly translated.
As we saw earlier, "aion" denotes an age that has a
beginning and an end. We will now go on to
demonstrate that this is the only proper
interpretation of this word.
God’s plan of the ages has been obscured and even
hidden by our erroneous translations, but the Greek
speaking saints of old understood it. They knew that
"aion" meant age, not world, not eternity, not
forever.
Hebrew s 1:1-2
God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the
prophets in many portions and in many ways, in
these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom
He appointed heir of all things, through whom also
He made the world [aion, age].
(NAS)
Hebrew s 11:3
By faith we understand that the worlds [aionas,
ages] were prepared by the word of God, so that
what is seen was not made out of things which are
visible.
(NAS)
The early saints understood that the Son of God
made the AGES. How much clearer the above
Scriptures would be if the modern translators
rendered these words correctly. The Greek word
‘aion’ in no way meant world. Consider then why
the translators rendered it in this fashion. Because
the church only understands one age for this earth,
the translators felt that no damage was done to
render the Greek word ‘aion’ as ‘world’. Yet it is a
horrendous interpretation that obscures the
meaning that Paul was expressing.
In Hebrews chapter one Paul is telling the saints
that this same Son of God through whom the Father
has spoken "in these last days", was the very one
through whom the Father "made the age". The
phrases "these last days" and "the age " are
complementary expressions. However, "these last
days" and "the world" are not. Paul then goes on to
declare that "the ages were prepared by the word of
God." The NAS translators, and many other popular
Bibles, have rendered this as "the worlds were
prepared." This is once more a very poor rendering.
These substitutions may appear small, yet with
every change that is made, that which was
expressed clearly to the early saints becomes more
obscure as bit by bit the truth is hidden away from
sight. The mystery that was hidden from previous
ages, is hidden once again, but this time it is not
hidden by God, but by Satan who desires to mask
the truth from the minds of millions.
The AGES were prepared by the word of God. Each
age had its purpose and the ages will continue until
the plan of God is complete and everything is
reconciled unto God through the cross of Christ. All
things have gone according to the plan of God.
Nothing has caught Him by surprise. Nothing has
interrupted His grand plan.
Isaiah 46:9-10
Remember the former things long past, for I am
God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is
no one like me, declaring the end from the
beginning and from ancient times things which
have not been done, saying, 'My purpose will be
established, and I will accomplish all My good
pleasure.
(NAS)
The message of the ages of God is found throughout
the Scriptures. In the New Testament, the Greek
word "aion" and its various forms is used widely,
and it finds its counterpart in the Old Testament
Hebrew word "olam". If the translators had
rendered these words consistently and accurately
then the knowledge of the ages of God would be well
known and understood today. Yet, chiefly due to the
popularity of poor English Bible translations today,
the saints are walking in darkness regarding this
matter.
To examine the many ways that this word "aion" has
been used in the New Testament, and the usages of
the associated Old Testament word "olam", I am
going to paste in a section from an article by J.
Preston Eby. This comes from his "Saviour of the
World" series, and is found in the section titled
"Eternity".
"AION" - AN AGE
This brings us to the thought I want to
share in this chapter. Let us consider
the wonderful Kingdom parable Jesus
told of the sheep and the goats. "When
the Son of man shall come in His glory,
and all the holy angels with Him, then
shall He sit upon the throne of His
glory: and before Him shall be gathered
all nations: and He shall separate them
one from another, as a shepherd
divides his sheep from the goats: and
He shall set the sheep on His right
hand, but the goats on the left. Then
shall the King say unto them on His
right hand, Come, blessed of My
Father, inherit the kingdom prepared
for you from the foundation of the
world: for I was hungry, and you gave
Me meat: I was thirsty, and you gave
Me drink: I was a stranger, and you
took Me in: naked, and you clothed Me:
I was sick, and you visited Me: I was in
prison, and you came unto Me. Then
shall the righteous answer Him, saying,
Lord, when did we see You hungry, and
fed You? or thirsty, and gave You
drink? When did we see You a stranger,
and take You in? or naked, and clothe
You? Or when did we see You sick, or in
prison, and come unto You? And the
King shall answer and say unto them,
Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as you
have done it unto the least of one of
these MY BROTHERS, you have done it
unto Me. Then shall He say also unto
them on the left hand, Depart from Me,
you cursed, into EVERLASTING FIRE
prepared for the devil and his angels:
for I was hungry, and you gave Me no
meat... then shall they also answer
Him, saying, Lord, when did we see
You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or
naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not
minister unto You? Then shall He
answer them, saying, Verily I say unto
you, Inasmuch as you did it not unto
one of the least of these, you did it not
unto Me. And these shall go away into
EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT: but
the righteous into LIFE ETERNAL"
(Mat. 25:31-46)...
While the King James version states
that these goats go into everlasting fire
and everlasting punishment and the
sheep enter into life eternal, that is not
quite the meaning of the Greek. The
Greek word here translated everlasting
and eternal is AIONIOS and AIONIOS
is the adjective form of the Greek noun
AION...
In late years there has been much
controversy over the meaning of the
little Greek word AION. Certain
[men]..., have maintained, contrary to
and in spite of all revealed facts, that it
means eternal. And our King James
version renders it, together with the
adjective AIONIOS as "age, course,
eternal, for ever, evermore, for ever
and ever, everlasting, world, beginning
of the world, world began, world
without end." What a horrible mixture!
But we need not remain in darkness,
for fortunately the Word of God tells us
precisely what this Greek word
means... AION nowhere means
eternal! Its simple meaning is an age.
In its plural form it means ages. This
fact can be unquestionably and
incontrovertibly demonstrated from
numerous New Testament passages. A
glance at any Greek concordance
proves that the noun AION, or AGE, is
not the synonym of eternity. A study of
each case would make a library; so,
leaving this task to the reader, we must
content ourselves with adducing a few
specimens to demonstrate the fact. It
is usage that determines meanings -
THEIR usage, not ours; the meanings
that the holy prophets and apostles
gave to their words rather than those
that our English translators may try to
give. Let me illustrate.
The term forever (and its equivalents,
eternal and everlasting) often occurs
when it cannot possibly mean
unending. In the story of Jonah one is
surprised to hear him say while in the
belly of the fish, "I went down to the
bottoms of the mountains; the earth
with her bars was about me for ever "
(Jonah 2:6). But he was in the fish only
three days and three nights! When a
Hebrew slave loved his master and did
not wish to go free at the end of the
seventh year, we read, "His master
shall bore his ear through with an awl;
and he shall serve him for ever " (Ex.
21:6). Of course, that couldn't be
longer than his life span. Again, when
Solomon built the temple unto the
Lord, he began his prayer of dedication
with the statement, "I have surely built
You a house to dwell in, a settled place
for You to abide in for ever " (I Kgs.
8:13). And the Lord answered
Solomon, "I have heard your prayer
and supplication that you have made
before Me: I have hallowed this house,
which you have built, to put My name
there for ever" (I Kgs. 9:3). But
Solomon's temple lasted for only about
400 years! And it was never in God's
mind to dwell there forever!
Here is something that ought to be
clear to any intelligent, honest man. A
word that is used to mean in one case
three days and nights, in another case
to mean a man's lifetime, and in still
another case to mean a period of about
four centuries, surely does not mean
unending or eternal, no matter what
English word is used to translate it.
USAGE DETERMINES MEANING.
Another illustration is the Aaronic
priesthood. According to the King
James version, Aaron and his sons
were anointed as priests for ever. It
says, "Their anointing shall surely be
an everlasting priesthood throughout
their generations" (Ex. 40:15). Yet we
read in Hebrews 7:11-18 that the
Aaronic priesthood is CHANGED to
that of Melchizedek. "Now if perfection
had been attainable by the Levitical
priesthood, for under it the people
were given the Law, why was it further
necessary that there should arise
another and different kind of Priest,
one after the order of Melchizedek,
rather than one appointed after the
order of Aaron? For when there is a
CHANGE IN THE PRIESTHOOD,
there is of necessity an alteration of the
law concerning the priesthood as well.
For it is obvious that our Lord sprang
from the tribe of Judah, and Moses
mentioned nothing about priests in
connection with that tribe. So, a
previous physical regulation and
command is CANCELED because of its
weakness and ineffectiveness and
uselessness" (Amplified Bible).
Amazing, isn't it, that the priesthood
which was ordained for ever has been
CANCELED! There would be no
contradiction if the statement in
Exodus were translated as it should be,
"to the age throughout their
generations." That is, throughout their
generations AS LONG AS THAT AGE
LASTED. In the Septuagint, the Greek
translation of the Hebrew Scriptures
which Jesus and His disciples used, the
Greek word AION was the word used
for the Hebrew OLAM. According to
Hebrew and Greek usage, therefore,
these words mean a period of time, a
period of unknown length, the
duration of which is determined by the
fact or condition or person to which
the term is applied.
Furthermore, Leviticus 24:8 states that
the covenant given to Israel was an
"everlasting covenant." Yet, it was
conditional and based on Israel's
obedience (Ex. 19:5-6). And the
inspired writer of the book of Hebrews
declares, "For if that first covenant had
been faultless, then should no place
have been sought for the second. For
finding fault with them, He says,
Behold, the days come, says the Lord,
when I will make a NEW COVENANT
with the house of Israel and with the
house of Judah... in that He says, A
new covenant, He has made the first
old. Now that which decays and waxes
old is ready to VANISH AWAY" (Heb.
8:7 8, 13). Ah, did you notice? The
everlasting covenant has been DONE
AWAY! What a wonder, that! We are
told that the "earth abides forever"
(Eccl. 1:4), but Jesus said, "Heaven
and earth shall pass away.. (Mat.
24:35).
The Lord announced through the
prophet Isaiah, "Upon the land of My
people shall come up thorns and
briers; yea upon all the houses of joy in
the joyous city: for the palace shall be
forsaken; the populous city shall be
deserted; the hill and the watch-tower
shall be dens for ever; a joy of wild
asses, a pasture for flocks; UNTIL the
Spirit be poured upon us from on high,
and the WILDERNESS BECOME a
fruitful field, and the fruitful field be
counted for a forest" (Isa. 32:13-15).
Verse 15 limits the use of the word in
verse 14, for the desolations of the land
are "for ever" only UNTIL the Spirit is
poured out from on high bringing
glorious RESTORATION!
As regards animal sacrifices, dietary
laws, ceremonial observances and
Sabbaths, each was to be "observed as
a statute forever" (Ex. 31:16-17; II
Chron. 2:4; Lev. 16:31). But the New
Testament clearly shows that these
were, one and all, but "carnal
ordinances imposed UNTIL the time of
reformation" (Heb. 9:10). It is clear - if
"for ever" really meant ETERNAL - we
would still be offering sheep, bullocks,
and goats as sacrifices to God! But -
more startling still - the idea of
endlessness does not adhere even to
the reign of Christ. Hebrews 1:8 says,
"But unto the Son He says, Your
throne, O God, is for ever and ever..."
Now turning to another Scripture
bearing on the same subject, we obtain
additional light on this subject. "Then
comes the end, when He shall have
delivered up the kingdom to God, even
the Father; when He shall have put
down all rule and all authority and
power. For He must reign TILL He has
put all enemies under His feet. And
when all things shall be subdued unto
Him, THEN SHALL THE SON ALSO
HIMSELF BE SUBJECT UNTO HIM
that put all things under Him, that God
may be all in all" (I Cor. 15:24-25,28).
The Kingdom of the Son will have a
conclusion. In some remote time the
Son delivers up the Kingdom to the
Father, the Kingdom continues no
longer in the rule of Sonship, but in the
rule of Fatherhood, that God may be
known no longer in and through the
Son and the Sons, but transcendentally
as ALL IN ALL...
The Hebrew word OLAM and its Greek
equivalent, AION, mean a limited
time, an age, and their plural means
ages...
Let us look at how the word AION is
used in a number of passages. About
37 times in the New Testament it is
rendered "world," twice as "worlds,"
twice as "ages," and once as "course."
Every place where the word "eternal"
appears, with but one exception, it is a
translation of this word AION or its
adjective form AIONIOS. Twice it is
rendered "evermore." Every place
where the word "everlasting" appears,
but one, it is this same word or its
adjective form. With but thirteen
exceptions, every place where the word
"ever" appears it is the same word or
its adjective form. And aside from all
this confusion, the word also appears
in the plural, and in a number of
confusing combinations, such as "the
aion of the aion," "the aion of the
aions," and "the aions of the aions,"
etc.
Some of the passages where AION is
found will give us added information
concerning it. In Ephesians 2:7 we
find, "in the ages (aions) to come." In
Colossians 1:26 we find, "the mystery
which has been hid from ages (aions).
" In Ephesians 2:2 we find "you
walked, according to the course (aion)
of this world." In Hebrews 1:2 we find,
"by whom also He made the worlds
(aions)." In Hebrews 11:3 we find, "the
worlds (aions) were formed by the
Word of God." In about fifteen
instances, such as Matthew 12:32, 1 Corinthians 1:20, etc., we find it
rendered "this world (aion)." Twice we
find "this present world (aion)." In
Galatians 1:4 we find, "deliver us from
this present evil world (aion)." In
Ephesians 6:12 we find, "the rulers of
the darkness of this world (aion)." In II
Corinthians 4:4 we find, "the god of
this world (aion)." In I Corinthians 2:6
we find, "the wisdom of this world
(aion)." In Luke 16:8 we find, "the
children of this world (aion)." In Mark
4:19 we find, "the cares of this world
(aion). " How much more
understandable it would be if the
translators had used the word age
instead of world!
In Mark 10:30 we find that there is not
only this present aion, which is evil,
but also "the world (aion) to come." In
Luke 20:35 we find, "but they that
shall be accounted worthy to obtain
that world (aion), and the resurrection
from the dead, neither marry nor are
given in marriage." In Hebrews 6:5 we
find, "and have tasted the powers of
the world (aion) to come." And in Luke
1:70, John 9:32, etc., we find that the
aion had a beginning: "since the world
(aion) began."
I would like to jump in here in the middle of Mr.
Eby’s discourse to actually do what he suggested. I
would like to render the Greek "aion" here in these
passages as "age" and we will see how wonderfully
the passages make sense.
Eph. 2:7 "in the ages (aions) to come."
Col. 1:26 "the mystery which has been hid from the
ages (aions). "
Eph. 2:2 "you walked, according to the age (aion) of
this world."
Heb. 1:2 "by whom also He made the ages (aions)."
Heb. 11:3 "the ages (aions) were formed by the
Word of God."
Gal. 1:4 "deliver us from this present evil age
(aion)."
Eph. 6:12 "the rulers of the darkness of this age
(aion)."
II Cor. 4:4 "the god of this age (aion)."
I Cor. 2:6 "the wisdom of this age (aion)."
Lk. 16:8 "the children of this age (aion)."
Mk. 4:19 "the cares of this age (aion)."
Mk. 10:3 0 "the age (aion) to come."
Lk. 20:35 "but they that shall be accounted worthy
to obtain that age (aion), and the resurrection from
the dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage."
Heb. 6:5 "and have tasted the powers of the age
(aion) to come."
John. 9:32 "since the age (aion) began."
(Now, back to Mr. Eby.)
And now in reviewing the Scriptures
we have just quoted we note that this
aion is something which has a king; it
has princes; it is in darkness; it had a
beginning; it has an ending; it is evil; it
has wisdom; it has children who
marry; it has cares. The aions we find
were made by Christ, simply through
His spoken Word, and we also find in
Colossians 1:26 that the mystery of
Christ in us, the hope of glory, has
been hidden from these aions.
Now, if AION means ETERNAL,
consider how ridiculous the Word of
God would be! The Holy Spirit would
be found saying, "the mystery which
has been hid from eternities; " "the
mystery of Christ which in other
eternities was not made known ; " "in
the eternities to come; " "You walked
according to the eternity of this
world; " "by whom also He made the
eternities; " "the rulers of the darkness
of this eternity; " "now once in the end
of the eternities has He appeared; " "the
harvest is the end of the eternity ; "
"since eternity began; " "in the
eternities to come," etc. etc... Suffice it
to say here that there have been
"aions" in the past, there is this present
"aion," and there are "aions" to come.
And these all combined make up
TIME, encompassing the whole of the
progressive plan and program of God
for the development of His creation.
When we see how often the New Testament writers
spoke of the age they lived in, as well as past ages,
and future ages, when we see how frequently they
used this word "aion" and its various forms, and
then we see how our modern Bibles have falsely
rendered this word into English in ways that it was
never intended, we can begin to understand the
extent of Satan’s effort to hide these truths from
man. It is no wonder that the saints do not
understand the concept of ages when the Word of
God has been altered to such an extent. There are
English translations that render these words
correctly, but they are little used and largely
unknown to most saints.
I would like to add something here that occurred to
me as I was researching these things for myself. I
hope you will likewise research them. Don’t take my
word for these things, and don’t take Mr. Eby’s
word, or anyone else’s. Be as the Bereans whom
Paul proclaimed to be more noble because they
listened to him and then searched the scriptures to
see whether these things were true.
As I looked at occurrences of "aion" in the New
Testament I came across numerous scriptures that
spoke of "aionion life" which is nearly always
translated "eternal life". Following is an example.
Matthew 19:16
And behold, one came to Him and said, "Teacher,
what good thing shall I do that I may obtain eternal
[aionion] life?"
Now, to my thinking it seemed rather awkward that
someone might ask Yahshua how he might obtain
"age-something" life. Wouldn’t someone indeed ask
Yahshua how to obtain life that never ends? Indeed,
I think they would. So, did I find a flaw in what has
been spoken so far? I don’t think so. What is needed
is further understanding.
As I have mentioned, the mass of Christendom has
not thought much beyond their current epoch, or
age. The common conception among Christianity
today is that when one dies, then eternity begins. As
we are finding out, this is not the case. The plan of
the ages has to be carried out until every age has run
its course, and we are not yet at the end.
So consider this, because we have had little or no
concept of God’s plan of the ages, how would you
ask God for life that endured to the end of the ages?
Do we even have an English word that means to the
end of the ages? Eternal doesn’t fit for eternal
means without beginning or end. How about
everlasting? Now, everlasting could possibly be used
for it has the meaning of the passage of time. It
could be defined as lasting to the end. But if one
isn’t careful how he defines this word and he defines
it as lasting forever, time without end, then we are
back to a concept of eternity that becomes
confusing.
To avoid misunderstanding, I know of at least one
translation that came up with a conjoined word to
describe what is being spoken of here. Young’s
Literal Translation uses the word combination "age-during".
This is somewhat awkward, but it makes
one think about what is really being stated. What is
being described is something that lasts for the
duration of the age, or for the duration of the ages.
Following is an example.
John 3:36
"he who is believing in the Son, hath life age-during
[aionion]."
Some translations render this as "life everlasting",
and this would be okay as long as one understands
that "life everlasting" is referring to a span of time
and not to eternity. Most English speaking people
make little distinction between everlasting and
eternity, which brings much confusion. However, it
would clearly be wrong to translate it as "life
eternal". The Greek word [aioonion] has "aion" as
its base and it means "age", so any form of the word
cannot denote eternity for eternity exists outside of
time and ages. Consider the following verse.
Mark 10:30
but that he shall receive a hundred times as much
now in the present age [kairoo, literally ‘time’],
houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and
children and farms, along with persecutions; and in
the age [aioni] to come, eternal [aionion] life.
(NAS)
This verse is a great one to look at for it gives us
many clues to understanding. First, we are shown
without a doubt that what is being discussed here is
something that is encompassed by the boundaries of
time. The Greek word "kairoo" that is translated
here as age, literally means time. Furthermore, this
same verse uses the word "aion" when it says, "in
the age [aion] to come". We can therefore know for
certain that the phrase "aionion life" is constrained
by what has just been said about it. One cannot
receive ETERNAL life in the AGE to come, for
ETERNAL has no beginning or end and the AGE to
come most certainly does. How could one receive
that which is outside of time in a period that is
clearly defined by time?
"Aionion life" has to mean age-during, or age-lasting
life. Unfortunately, in our English language
we do not have one individual word that I can think
of that would describe this age-during, or age-lasting
life, that would not be confused with
eternity. The translators chose words that they felt
were suitable, but they did not fully understand the
concept of God’s plan of the ages. Because of this,
the words in our popular translations are not only
unsuitable, but they actually say something quite
contrary to what is meant.
The church is very much confused about what
eternity actually is. If they understood eternity they
would realize that the phrase "eternal life" really
doesn’t fit here. Let me try to describe what I have
come to understand.
God devised by His own counsel a plan of the ages.
Every created thing is contained within this plan of
the ages. We are told that "In the beginning, God
created the heavens and the Earth." The phrase, "In
the beginning" indicates that time was existent and
at the very beginning of time, at the very beginning
of the plan of the ages, God created the heavens and
the Earth.
As we read further in the Genesis account we find
that all things in, upon, and under the Earth were
created sometime after "in the beginning." It stands
to reason that all that was created in heaven was
also created after "in the beginning", this would
include the angels, cherubim, seraphim, and every
other created thing. All of these things are part of
God’s plan of the ages.
Within this plan there is great struggle due to sin
and rebellion. However, we are told that when the
plan of the ages concludes that ALL things in
HEAVEN and EARTH will be reconciled to God. We
are told that ALL things will be summed up in God
and HE will be ALL in ALL. Nothing will be out of
harmony with God. No rebellion will exist any
longer. Sin will be ended. DEATH will be the LAST
enemy to be conquered.
At this point the plan of the ages will be complete
and all things will be summed up in God. Eternity
will now be present (We cannot say it will begin, for
this would be contradictory. It would be better to
say that time will be abolished.) The main
characteristic of eternity will be an absence of
change. Time is defined by its passing, but there will
be no change, no passing of time. We will be outside
of time. In a similar vein, we ourselves will not
change. When we are summed up in God and He
has become ALL in ALL then we will be exactly like
the one who is the King of the Ages, Immortal,
Invisible (I Timothy 1:17). We will no longer need to
grow, or mature, or be conformed to His image, for
we will be His image. We will be in Him. We will be
unchanging, even as He is.
When one understands this concept of eternity then
one can understand that the phrase "eternal life" is
really not appropriate in the way in which it has
been applied in scripture, for in our current life we
are changing. We are being sanctified. We are
maturing. We are being conformed to the image of
Christ. We have not yet entered that state of union
with God where we are like Him.
When the plan of the ages is accomplished, then
time will be no more. Time is the surest way that we
measure progress, but there will be no more
progress once God has become all in all. There will
be no more "death working in us" for our sinful
flesh will have been put off. This corruption will put
on incorruption. This mortal will put on
immortality. There will be nothing any longer to
oppose life. Death will have been conquered and
abolished. Death will have been swallowed up in
victory. Death will be no more. Death denotes a
change from a state of living, but there will be no
change in eternity, no death. We will simply BE.
There will be nothing to overcome, nothing to resist.
I must add, it will most likely be many long ages yet
before we come to this point. Not all has been
revealed to us. The Father has primarily revealed to
us the facts about the age we are in and those
immediately preceding and following. He has not
revealed much beyond these other than what the
end result will be when the ages have ended. There
are untold mysteries of the previous ages, and there
will be much to follow in the coming ages. We only
see this very narrowly now, but we should not fall
into the error of those who thought the Earth was
the center of the Universe. Our current age is not
the end of all things. It is merely one act in the
grand play the Father has written.
Going back to a scripture I just quoted from, I
Timothy 1:17, we see something that further
substantiates the revelation we are bringing forth.
First let me show you how it is often popularly
translated.
I Timothy 1:17
Now to the King eternal [aionoon], immortal,
invisible, the only God, be honor and glory forever
and ever. Amen. (NAS)
On the surface this verse would seem to give us
problems, for certainly God is eternal. His life goes
beyond the boundaries of the ages. It would seem
that the translators chose the right word for
"aionoon" here, for God is not confined simply to
the limits of the ages. However, a closer look reveals
something quite interesting that actually greatly
supports the truth into which we are delving.
First consider, what is the difference between
eternal and immortal? Why would Paul say God is
eternal and immortal? Both words signify the same
thing. The Greek word rendered here as immortal is
Strongs’ 86 2, aphthartos (af'-thar-tos). It holds the
meaning of "undecaying in essence or continuance."
We are being told by this word that God changes not
in His essence or in His continuance. Neither His
being nor His existence suffer any decay. Depending
on the translation, some have picked up on one
shade of meaning and some another. Some
interpret it to mean "incorruptible" (His essence
does not decay), and some as "immortal" (His
continuance does not decay).
Understanding the meaning of this word, we then
see that it would be redundant for Paul to say God
is "eternal, immortal...", since both words share the
same meaning. So what was Paul really saying? If
you have a Greek New Testament, or an Interlinear
Bible that parallels the Greek and English
translation, you will see that there is a Greek word
right before the word translated as eternal
[aionoon]. This is the Greek word "toon", which is
the definite article akin to our English word "the".
In the KJV this word is rendered in different places
as "the", "this", "that", "one", "he", "she", "it", etc....
These are all definite articles.
The translators of the KJV did not include this word
in this verse, however, because it seems to have no
place in the way they translated this phrase. If we
look once more at Young’s Literal Translation, we
see that eternal is rightly translated ages and the
preceding definite article now has its rightful place.
I Timothy 1:17
and to the King of the [toon] ages [aionoon], the
incorruptible, invisible, only wise God, is honour
and glory -- to the age of the ages! Amen.
(Young’s Literal Translation)
Yes! This clears up the redundancy and it renders
the word "aionoon" consistently with its usage in
the rest of scripture. But what is with this phrase,
"to the age of the ages"? What exactly does it mean.
Again, I would like to insert a quote from Mr. Eby
since he has done a good job of explaining this.
THE AGE OF THE AGES
While the Scriptures speak of an age,
and the ages, and the ages of the ages, -
one age proceeding from, or out of, a
previous age until all the ages have run
their courses - it also points to that
glorious climactic age of all ages. We
read the phrase, "Your throne, O God,
is for ever and ever" (Heb. 1:8). These
words "for ever and ever" come from
the Greek which literally reads TO THE
AGE OF THE AGES. This is very
familiar terminology in the Scripture.
Few men have been caught away by the
spirit of inspiration as was the wise
king Solomon when he penned the
beautiful Song of Solomon. God
dropped one thousand and five songs
down into the heart of Solomon, but of
these only five, comprising the Song of
Solomon, have been preserved and
have found a place in Holy Scripture.
Inspiration named it "The Song of
Songs," that is, the one song which was
above and beyond all the songs that
have ever come from human heart and
human lips. Just as the "Song of
Songs" was chief above them all, just as
the "Holy of holies" was the Holiest
place of all, just as the "heaven of the
heavens" is the highest heaven of all,
just as the "King of kings" is the
greatest King of all, so all through the
Scriptures, though obscured by many
translators, we have this remarkable
phrase TO THE AGE OF THE AGES. It
points to that age which shall be the
most glorious of all, and which finds its
type in the year of Jubilee. This is the
Holy Spirit's way of expressing the
superlative, and so far as God's plan of
the ages is concerned this AGE OF
THE AGES is THE AGE PAR
EXCELLENCE of them all. A simple
illustration of this is our expression, "a
day of days," meaning a day that
comes out of previous days, which
crowns them, and embodies not only
what they contained, but the full
fruition of all that was elementary in
them. Eternity does not emerge full
grown in man's consciousness until
this wonderful age is ended. This AGE
OF THE AGES is that glorious climax
to His purpose and process of the ages,
wherein He states, "Behold, I make
ALL things new" (Rev. 21:5). And
when He says, "ALL," it is self-evident
that there is nothing remaining in the
universe which shall not be made new,
else all is not all. "For He must reign
until He has put ALL enemies under
His feet. The last enemy that shall be
destroyed is death" (I Cor. 15:25-26).
When the last enemy is under His feet,
destroyed, and there is no more death
in any creature anywhere in all God's
great universe, then shall God be all in
all! The Amplified gives, "Be
everything to everyone." Time comes
to an end when the ages end and
eternity, with God "all in all," becomes
a conscious reality.
[end quote]
Doesn’t this make marvelous sense and present a
tremendous harmony with the rest of the
Scriptures? How often we use the phrase "King of
kings", or "Lord of lords" and it seems perfectly
natural and makes great sense to us. Why should we
stumble over the phrase "the Age of the ages?" This
too makes wonderful sense when we too understand
God’s plan of the ages and that there will be a final
age that is the glorious crowning summation of all
other ages. It will be this age that leads us to that
state where ALL will be summed up in God and He
becomes ALL in ALL.
A correct reading of the next age to come, the
Millennial Kingdom of Christ, reveals that it is not
the crowning age. There is still much that is
imperfect and out of harmony with God in it.
Although Christ will rule the nations with a rod of
iron, the very fact that He must do so indicates that
these nations have not come to a point of complete
reconciliation to God. Furthermore, we are told that
at the end of the Millennium that Satan will be
loosed and he will lead the nations in rebellion
against the Lord, the Son of God (Revelation 20:3,
7-10). Also, during the Millennium we are told that
there will be repercussions for those who do not do
as God commands them (Zechariah 14:16-19).
The age following the Millennial reign of Christ will
also not be perfect, for not all will be reconciled.
There will be those who are cast into the Lake of
Fire. If they are in the Lake of Fire then they have
not yet been reconciled to God through Christ and
all has not yet been summed up in the Father.
This then leads us into our next topic, "What is the
purpose of the Lake of Fire." We shall see that it
holds a principle role in preparing all the creation to
be summed up in Christ, and that it cannot possibly
be eternal in nature as many teach, and as the
popular English Bibles state. The Scriptures have
been corrupted, and their corruption has led to
many false understandings. Thankfully, the Father
has sent us the Spirit to lead us into all truth, and to
restore the damage that has been done by the
enemy of truth.
Hell and the Lake of Fire
Much confusion has come about today through not
understanding the distinctions between certain
Biblical words that refer to the place people go when
they die. Words such as Gehenna, Hades, Hell,
Tartarus, Tophet, Abaddon, Sheol, the Lake of Fire,
Paradise, Abraham’s Bosom, and Heaven have all
become mixed up together into a terrible jumble.
We need to sort these things out to see things
clearly. We can gain some understanding as we look
at the following words of Christ:
Luke 16:19-25
"Now there was a rich man, and he habitually
dressed in purple and fine linen, joyously living in
splendor every day. And a poor man named Lazarus
was laid at his gate, covered with sores, and longing
to be fed with the crumbs which were falling from
the rich man's table; besides, even the dogs were
coming and licking his sores. Now the poor man
died and was carried away by the angels to
Abraham's bosom; and the rich man also died and
was buried. In Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in
torment, and saw Abraham far away and Lazarus in
his bosom. And he cried out and said, ‘Father
Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus so
that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and
cool off my tongue, for I am in agony in this flame.’
But Abraham said, ‘Child, remember that during
your life you received your good things, and likewise
Lazarus bad things; but now he is being comforted
here, and you are in agony.’"
This teaching may have very well been a true
account since Yahshua actually named the poor
man, something He did not do in His parables. In
the parables He would simply state "A certain man",
or "a publican", or some other designation, but here
He identifies the poor man as one named Lazarus,
and He also identifies Abraham.
Yahshua reveals that when men die they go to either
a place where they are tormented, or a place where
they are comforted. This is dependent upon their
previous life. He portrays this through a
conversation that the rich man has with Abraham.
The rich man says, "I am in agony in this flame." In
this passage, this place is identified as Hades, which
some translations render Hell. Judea at this time lay
under the power of the Roman Empire, and before
this the Greeks had held sway. Both Greek and
Roman mythology described a place of fiery
torment called Hades, or Tartarus.
We see these Greek and Roman words being used in
the New Testament to describe this place of
suffering. The men who penned the books of the
New Testament were not teaching Greek or Roman
mythology, they were simply using words that had
at that time become commonplace and would be
recognized by all as speaking of a fiery place of
torment where departed souls went.
Gehenna was another term, this one Hebrew, that
spoke of a place of torment. Gehenna referred to a
valley near Jerusalem where children were
sacrificed by fire to Moloch, and hence it was known
as a place of abomination. Gehenna literally means,
the valley of Hinnom. This valley later became the
garbage dump for Jerusalem, an appropriate
defiling of an idolatrous location, and the garbage
was burned to reduce its mass and prevent disease.
The fires in the valley of Gehenna burned
continuously, and it also became an appropriate
expression to describe this fiery place of torment.
The word Tophet was also associated with the Valley
of Hinnom, or Gehenna. The word Tophet meant "a
place of cremation", and it was associated with the
abominable practice of those who worshiped
Moloch of burning their children in the fire. We see
the relation between the words Tophet and the
Valley of Hinnom (Gehenna) in the following
verses:
Jeremiah 7:31-32
And they have built the high places of Tophet, which
is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their
sons and their daughters in the fire; which I
commanded them not, neither came it into my
heart. Therefore, behold, the days come, saith
Yahweh, that it shall no more be called Tophet, nor
the valley of the son of Hinnom, but the valley of
slaughter: for they shall bury in Tophet, till there be
no place.
These words came to represent a place of fiery
torment where the wicked went after death.
Another similar Hebrew word was Abaddon, which
holds the meaning of "a destroyer."
Hell, Hades, Tartarus, Gehenna, Tophet and
Abaddon are all names describing the same thing,
though they are not the same thing as the Lake of
Fire. Although we see fire mentioned in association
with many of these names, the Scriptures make a
distinction between them and the Lake of Fire.
Hades, Tartarus, Gehenna, Tophet and Abaddon are
commonly called Hell today, and many saints
confuse the Lake of Fire with Hell, yet they are
separate and distinct as we see in the next verse.
Revelation 20:14
Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of
fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.
Some translations render this as "death and Hell
were thrown into the Lake of Fire." You cannot
throw something into itself. The Lake of Fire cannot
be Hell, for they are listed separately and distinctly
here. Hell (Hades, Tartarus, Gehenna, Tophet,
Abaddon) is the place that the wicked go until they
are judged. We read this in the verse just prior to the
one above.
Revelation 20:13
And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and
death and Hades gave up the dead which were in
them; and they were judged, every one of them
according to their deeds.
I will not go into what the sea and death are speaking
of here, but they are not what most people
commonly think. Our focus is on Hades, and we can
see that the souls of evil men remain in Hades until
the judgment. After the judgment, the wicked are
then thrown into the Lake of Fire.
Revelation 20:15
And if anyone's name was not found written in the
book of life, he was thrown into the Lake of Fire.
The expression "out of the frying pan into the fire"
comes to mind here, for we see the wicked who were
in Hell now cast into the Lake of Fire. The church
teaches that once one is cast into the Lake of Fire
they will remain there forever, but we will see that
this cannot possibly be so. The Scriptures reveal that
many saints will share a place with the wicked in the
Lake of Fire, and when one understands this truth,
they will certainly want to concede that this will not
be for eternity. Let me show you this from Scripture.
Revelation 2:11
"He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit
says to the churches. He who overcomes will not be
hurt by the second death."
Notice clearly that this word is being spoken to the
CHURCH in Smyrna. Not all saints are counted
among the overcomers. There are both foolish and
wise virgins among the saints of God. Some will
suffer the second death, and some will be spared.
Let us look at another verse:
Revelation 20:4-6
Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and
judgment was given to them. And I saw the souls of
those who had been beheaded because of their
testimony of Yahshua and because of the word of
God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or
his image, and had not received the mark on their
forehead and on their hand; and they came to life
and reigned with Christ for a thousand
years. The rest of the dead did not come to life
until the thousand years were completed. This is
the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is
the one who has a part in the first
resurrection; over these the second death
has no power, but they will be priests of God and
of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand
years.
Again, this passage speaks of overcomers among the
church who will have a part in the first resurrection,
and these will reign with Christ for a thousand
years. These will escape the second death. Many
saints, however, will not be partakers of this first
resurrection. They will have to await a later
resurrection. Yahweh does make a distinction
between those who are worthy and those who are
not. Note the words of Hebrews:
Hebrews 11:35
Women received back their dead by resurrection;
and others were tortured, not accepting their
release, so that they might obtain a better
resurrection...
The scriptures teach that there will be multiple
resurrections, and blessed are those who attain to
the first, the foremost, the highest and most
glorious resurrection. Those who attain to the first
resurrection will be spared the second death. We
know that the second death is synonymous with the
Lake of Fire.
Revelation 20:14
Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of
fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.
Revelation 21:8
"But for the cowardly and unbelieving and
abominable and murderers and immoral persons
and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their part
will be in the lake that burns with fire and
brimstone, which is the second death."
Notice who this last Scripture states will be thrown
into the Lake of Fire. The second group mentioned
is the "unbelieving ". Compare this to Christ’s
following words:
Luke 12:45-46
But if that servant says in his heart, 'My master is
delaying his coming,' and begins to beat the male
and female servants, and to eat and drink and be
drunk, the master of that servant will come on a day
when he is not looking for him, and at an hour when
he is not aware, and will cut him in two and
appoint him his portion with the
unbelievers.
Yahshua is speaking of believers here. He is
speaking of those who are His servants, those who
call Him "Master" or "Lord ". Yet not all of His
servants are faithful. Some are lazy and wicked.
Some are carnal and worldly. These believers who
have failed to overcome will be assigned a portion,
or place, with the unbelievers. We just read what the
portion of the unbelievers is. Their portion is in the
Lake of Fire. Those who teach and preach eternal
torment in the Lake of Fire are consigning many of
their Christian brothers and sisters to eternal
torment. Thankfully, God does not make the same
judgment. Many saints will have a portion with the
unbelievers, but it will not be eternal.
So, what exactly is the purpose of the Lake of Fire?
We have seen previously that the end of God’s plan
of the ages will see all of creation summed up in
Christ. All will be subject to Christ and no rebellion
will exist anywhere among the creation. For this to
be true then a great work of death must occur in the
fallen creation in order for new life to come forth.
Even as the saints must crucify their sinful flesh in
order to walk in the newness of life in the Spirit, so
every part of creation must undergo this death
process. Everything that does not find its source in
God must perish. Every trace of sin, rebellion,
worldliness and idolatry must perish from the
creation before the creation can be united with God
where He can become all in all.
There is a reason why the Lake of Fire is called the
second death. It is the place where all that is not like
unto God must die. The saints have the opportunity
while they are alive during the present age to
present themselves as a living sacrifice upon the
altar of God. They can present themselves to God
now as a freewill offering that He might purge them
of all wickedness and sin, and those who do so will
have great reward and they will be spared the
second death. Because they have voluntarily
embraced a death to self that the life of Christ might
be manifested in them, they will escape the second
death.
Many saints, however, choose not to allow God to
purge, purify and refine them. They resist this
process and they cling stubbornly to their soul life
and their love for the world and its pleasures. Many
have adopted doctrines of demons that declare that
no death is necessary, that God wants to pamper
and coddle them and give them everything their
flesh lusts after. Because these do not voluntarily
follow Christ to the cross, they will have to endure
the second death, and their loss of reward will be
great.
Paul compares those who have wisely used their
time in this life to those who have foolishly
squandered their life in Christ in the book of I
Corinthians.
I Corinthians 3:12-15
Now if any man builds on the foundation with gold,
silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw, each man's
work will become evident; for the day will show it
because it is to be revealed with fire, and the fire
itself will test the quality of each man's work. If any
man's work which he has built on it remains, he will
receive a reward. If any man's work is burned
up, he will suffer loss; but he himself will be
saved, yet so as through fire.
Those saints who spend their lives foolishly will
suffer loss. It is unimaginable how great this loss
will be. Truly there will be myriads of saints who
experience weeping, wailing, and gnashing of teeth
as they understand what they have forfeited. In
choosing not to embrace the disciple’s cross, they
have cast off all reward that would have been theirs
throughout the ages. These will go through the Lake
of Fire where every vestige of self-life that they
protected and clung to will be purged away.
The Lake of Fire must of necessity be employed to
remove rebellion and every evil and wicked thing
from the hearts of men and of angels. It is not
simply a place of unending torment designed to
punish those who are evil, this being the prevailing
mindset of the church. It is a place of purging and
cleansing. Do the scriptures reveal this purpose of
purging and cleansing? Yes, they do!
Let us look at the scripture in Matthew where we
are told that Yahshua will separate the sheep from
the goats, some entering into blessing while others
enter into a time of correction.
Matthew 25:34 - 46
"Then the King will say to those on His right, 'Come,
you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the
kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of
the world... 'And when did we see You sick, or in
prison, and come to You?' And the King will answer
and say to them, 'Truly I say to you, to the extent
that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even
the least of them, you did it to Me.' Then He will
also say to those on His left, 'Depart from Me,
accursed ones, into the eternal [aionian] fire which
has been prepared for the devil and his angels... And
these will go away into eternal [aionian]
punishment, but the righteous into eternal [aionian]
life." (NAS)
Now, I don’t want to belabor the point by showing
further how the phrases that contain the Greek
word aion and its variants should actually be
interpreted as "age lasting fire", "age lasting
punishment", "life of the ages", etc.. We have
already seen that this is truly the meaning of "aion"
and its variations. It was the doctrine of the Roman
Catholic Church, and later the Anglican Church, as
well as others, that Hell is an eternal place of
torment and no soul shall ever escape from it. The
translators therefore translated according to their
false understanding. But there have been other
translators through the years who did not share the
mythology of Rome and they have made much
better translations. Following are just a few.
Matthew 25:41
"Depart from Me, you cursed ones, into that aionian
fire... and these shall go away into a cutting-off age
lasting." (Diaglott)
Matthew 25:41
"And these He will dismiss into a LONG
CORRECTION."
(The Bible in Modern English by Farrar Fenton)
Matthew 25:41
"These shall go away into age-abiding correction."
(Rotherham's New Testament)
Matthew 25:41
"And these shall go away to punishment age-during."
(Young's Literal Translation)
I would like to interject a thought here. Some may
be concerned that it is seemingly only relatively
obscure translations that bring out the true
meaning of these phrases. They may be concerned
that the overwhelming majority of the most popular
translations that are used nearly universally by the
Christians of our day do not reveal these meanings.
In fact, these popular Bibles declare something
quite contrary. I know that no believer that has a
shred of integrity would declare that the majority
must be right simply due to their numbers, but it is
somehow disturbing to find that so many are being
led astray, that so many have embraced that which
is no truth at all, but is in fact based upon
mythology and fables.
To this person who has this concern I would say
this, "The Scriptures clearly show that this would be
the condition of the church in the last days."
II Timothy 4:3-4
For the time will come when they will not endure
sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears
tickled, they will accumulate for themselves
teachers in accordance to their own desires; and will
turn away their ears from the truth, and will turn
aside to MYTHS.
II Thessalonians 2:3
Let no one in any way deceive you, for it [the
coming of the Lord Yahshua the Messiah] will not
come unless the apostasy comes first, and the
man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of
destruction...
We live in a day, at the end of our current age, when
men will not endure sound doctrine. They have
turned aside from the truth, exchanging truth for
myth. Did not Paul say clearly this would be the
case? Furthermore, as so many are speaking of the
soon return of the Lord, have they duly noted that
He will not return unless the apostasy comes first?
The apostasy is defined as "a falling away from the
truth". The word apostasy shares as part of its root
the same word for divorce. Apostasy is a
divorcement from the truth that men might be
wedded to falsehood, mythology, and fable.
If this apostasy must occur first, then where is it?
Do you really believe that the masses of
Christendom are walking in truth? This cannot be
for Paul said clearly that Yahshua would not return
unless His return was preceded by a great falling
away from truth. So, it should be no surprise at all
that the popular Bible translations of our day are
full of mythology and error. It should be expected.
It was prophesied by the holy apostles and prophets.
One should anticipate that it is only a remnant that
have their eyes opened in this day and hour to
perceive the truth. Don’t be unsettled by the fact
that what is being taught here goes against the
overwhelming mindset of the majority. This must
by necessity be the case. Paul further tells us,
II Thessalonians 2:10-11
Because they did not receive the love of the truth so
as to be saved. And for this reason God will send
upon them a deluding influence so that they might
believe what is false...
The salvation here is not referring to the salvation of
the spirit of man, but to the saving of his soul. This
is also referred to in Hebrews 9:28 and in many
other places in scripture. This also refers to being
saved from the second death, which is the lake of
fire (Revelation 2:11, 20:6, 14, 21:8). Because so
many have loved their delusions and they have not
known a love of the truth (pursuing and clinging to
truth even at the cost of rejection, personal loss,
tribulation, distress, etc.), God has sent upon them
a deluding influence.
We are seeing played out a mirror image of what
transpired in the Garden of Eden when God
prepared a bride for Adam. God is now preparing a
Bride for Christ and He has caused a "deep sleep" to
come over the body while the material for the bride
is extracted. This deep sleep is a spirit of slumber
and delusion as is clearly seen in Isaiah 29:10-14. I
encourage you to read this if you have any doubts
about the Bride of Christ being formed while the
body is under the same condition of deep sleep as
was revealed in type through Adam.
It should be no wonder then that only a remnant
will receive the truth in this hour. It was only a
remnant of Adam’s body that was used to form his
bride and it is likewise only a remnant of the body of
the Last Adam, Yahshua the Messiah, that will be
used to form His Bride.
Not long ago my family and I saw how far men in
the church have turned aside to myths. We were
invited to go watch a performance put on by a local
church called "Heaven’s Gates and Hell’s Flames".
This play is being performed in multitudes of
churches throughout the United States and abroad,
and it is used as an evangelistic tool to bring the lost
to repentance. Yet this play is filled with incredible
error that is based upon mythology.
The play consists of a number of mini skits where
various individual’s lives are portrayed. Some of
these individuals are believers and some are
unbelievers who have rejected Christ. Different
events occur that leads to the death of these
individuals, and the believers awake after their
deaths to be ushered into the gates of heaven. The
unbelievers, however, awake to find themselves in
a dark place where Satan and his demons appear
and they begin to taunt and torment these souls
who died without Christ. The character playing the
part of Satan emits a maniacal laugh as he
commands his demons to drag the lost away to hell
where they will never escape.
This depiction of Satan as being the ruler of the
underworld and having authority over departed
souls has no foundation in Scripture. The Scriptures
clearly depict Satan as being cast into the Lake of
Fire to be tormented and purged of his evil, and he
is not given authority over the other demons and
men that are placed there with him. He is a captive
and a prisoner along with all else who are there. I
have seen myriads of cartoons with Satan standing
guard over the prisoners of hell with a pitchfork in
his hand, yet this perverted image has no basis in
the truth.
How then did this image come to find such
widespread acceptance among the saints? It is the
product of pagan mythology being mixed into
Christian doctrine. The Romans taught that the
underworld, the place of torment where the dead
went, was ruled over by one of the gods whose name
was Hades. The underworld came to bear the same
name as the god who ruled over it. In Roman
mythology it was taught that Hades never allowed
any to escape who entered his dark domain. He also
had a three headed dog named Cerberus who
watched the gates of Hades to make sure that none
should escape. Here then, in the mythology of
Rome, is the origin of the idea that Satan rules the
underworld and that his demons are there to
torment the souls there and to ensure that none
escape. Satan has merely replaced the god Hades,
and the demons have replaced Cerberus.
When the emperor Constantine declared the pagan
citizens of Rome to be Christians, and he declared
Rome to be a Christian empire, he did not throw off
the mythology of Rome. Instead, he incorporated
these myths and fables into the doctrines of the
church. A tremendous pollution occurred as the
holy and the profane was mixed together. This
pollution continues to this day, and it is a
fulfillment of Paul’s words that men would "turn
aside to myths and fables" and they would no longer
"endure sound doctrine." Few will receive the truths
written about in this book. Only a remnant will cast
away the mythology of the past and embrace truth.
It is for these that this book is written.
Now, let us return to our examination of Matthew
25 where we are told that the goats will be sent away
to an age-lasting correction in the lake of fire. I will
quote one more time here from Mr. Eby.
The word punishment is from the
Greek KOLASIS which means simply
that - punishment. But it comes from
the root KOLAZO which reveals the
true nature of the punishment.
KOLAZO according to Strong's
Concordance, means "to curtail" or "to
chastise". The word means "a pruning"
according to Liddell and Scott's Greek
English Lexicon. It is so used all
through the Greek language. That
punishment of which the Christ spoke
was the very thing that helped me to
see the glorious HOPE for all who are
unbelievers or rebellious against God -
because the word punishment there
means chastisement or pruning. I saw
in a moment that it was not the
destruction of the man; it was the
correcting of the man. It was not the
destruction of the tree; it was the
cutting back, and the pruning, that it
might bring forth fruit. Some rightly
reason that KOLASIS cannot mean
corrective punishment or pruning if it
is everlasting. Whoever heard of
EVERLASTING CORRECTION! But
everlasting is itself wrong. It is
age-lasting punishment, age-abiding
correction, age-during pruning.
There are those who did not enter into
His life in ages past, there are those
who do not enter into His life in this
present age, and there shall be those
who will not enter into His life in the
age to come. But in the world where
God is the King you can count on it -
every man will finally have to face up
to his waywardness, and being
thoroughly disciplined, broken, and
purged of self-will, until he is prepared
to respond to the love of Christ, to
advance from the realm of punishment
into the blessing of HIS LIFE and
victory. If you do not punish a criminal
for his improvement, for what do you
punish him? There are just two right
reasons - to protect society and to
restore the criminal to society
improved by the punishment. The
"aionian" punishment which will come
to every sinner who goes to hell will be
a punishment that will break his
stubborn, rebellious spirit and bring
him back to God!
It is most regrettable that many Bible
translators have been careless in their
translation of words that concern the
ages. The common thought seems to
have been that any age following this
present age must be identical with
eternity, which, of course, is gross
error, and we get ourselves into all
manner of confusion by thinking that
such is the case. For instance,
according to the King James version,
Jesus, speaking of the blasphemy
against the Holy Spirit, is clearly
quoted as saying, "He that blasphemes
the Holy Ghost has never forgiveness"
(Mk. 3:29). Because of this faulty
rendering we have concocted the
fallacious notion of an unpardonable
sin. But the Emphatic Diaglott
translates the passage correctly thus:
"Whoever may blaspheme the Holy
Spirit has no forgiveness to the age,
but is exposed to aionian (age-lasting)
judgment." Likewise also the passage
in Matthew 12:32...... Whosoever
speaks against the Holy Ghost, it shall
not be forgiven him, neither in this
world, neither in the world to come."
The word world here, as the margin of
your Bible will probably indicate, is
translated from the Greek word AION,
which means age or a period of time.
See also Young's Concordance. Hence
the translation should be, "It shall not
be forgiven him, neither in this age nor
in the coming age" (Diaglott). Jesus
was born in the age of law. Therefore,
when He spoke of this age, He was
speaking of the age of law, the age to
come being the Church age in which
we now live.
God's precious people, saturated and
literally "oozing" with the false
doctrines of the harlot Church systems
have long viewed God's judgments as a
vindictive action prompted by a motive
for revenge and supported by a
tumultuous wrath that must be
pacified. NOT SO! Such is a gross
caricature of our God! His mercy and
grace are super-abundant, His mercy
endures to all ages, and though He
finds it necessary to chasten, His
wisdom and righteousness produce a
just and pure chastisement
conditioned to correct the situation,
and bring forth a creature prepared to
respond to the delivering and
redeeming power of God. ALL OF
GOD'S JUDGMENTS ARE CORRECTIVE IN NATURE,
conceived
in His wisdom, motivated by His love,
administered by His power, and used
to work out the divine purpose, into
our good, and unto His praise!
The next section is taken from another article in the
"Saviour of the World" series by J. Preston Eby. The
article is called, "The Lake of Fire".
THE LAKE OF FIRE
I believe every word that the Bible says
about the lake of fire; I don't believe
what Rome says about it, nor what the
apostate Churches say about it, nor
what tradition says about it; but I
certainly believe what the Bible says
about it.
The teaching concerning the lake of
fire does not appear anywhere in
Scripture except in the book of
Revelation where it is spoken of in the
following passages: Rev. 14:10-11;
19:20; 20:10; 20:13-15 and 21:8. This
last passage definitely states, "But the
fearful, and unbelieving, and the
abominable, and murderers, and
whoremongers, and sorcerers, and
idolators, and all liars shall have their
part in the lake which burns with fire
and brimstone: which is the second
death." There should be no question
remaining as to the certainty of this
lake of fire; neither should there be any
doubt as to the awful consequence of
having to be cast into it. These
Scriptures with their dreadful
foreboding should be a fearful warning
to all unthinking and foolish people
who, because of their love for the
world, the flesh, and the devil, have
dared to ask why we should serve God
now if all are going to be saved
eventually. Such people have no love
for God nor fear of God, and they
manifest by what they say that their
professed serving of God is only a
pretense, arising - not from any true
love for Him - but from fear of
punishment...
Because of the gross misunderstanding
of almost all people concerning the
lake of fire, I would like to draw your
attention to three words found in the
passage quoted above. "But the fearful,
and unbelieving, and murderers, and
whoremongers, and sorcerers, and
idolaters, and all liars shall have their
part in the lake which BURNS with
FIRE and BRIMSTONE: which is the
second death." The word BURN means
combustion, or to consume. To
consume does not mean to annihilate,
for there is no such thing as
annihilation in the absolute sense.
When fire consumes a log in your
fireplace it does not destroy any of the
elements within the log, it merely
changes their form. Combustion is the
process by which chemicals combine to
form new chemicals. For example: a
tree might be cut down, sawed into fire
wood, and burned. When the wood is
burning the heat causes the chemicals
of which the wood is composed to
vaporize, mixing with the oxygen in
the air to form new chemicals,
including water and the gas carbon
dioxide. So what was formerly a tree is
no longer identified as the form of a
tree, but the substance thereof is now
simply CHANGED into a DIFFERENT
FORM and exists in its new form
within the atmosphere as water,
carbon dioxide, etc. Thus, to burn,
means to CHANGE. Furthermore, it is
interesting to note that fire does not
burn down; it always burns up; it seeks
the highest level. And all that it
consumes "goes up in smoke," to exist
in a new form in a higher dimension.
Even if you take a pan of water and
place it over a fire, before long the
water will take on the property of the
fire and will begin to go up in steam.
To burn means to CHANGE, and the
change is always UPWARD in its
motion.
FIRE is the heat and light that you feel
and see when something burns. It
takes heat to start a fire, but once the
fire is started it produces heat that
keeps the process going. Thus, fire is
really HEAT and LIGHT.
In my study of the lake that burns with
fire and brimstone I was very much
helped and impressed by the
understanding given by Charles
Pridgeon and I would like to quote
from his scholarly work on the subject
of BRIMSTONE. He says: "The Lake of
Fire and Brimstone signifies a fire
burning with brimstone; the word
'brimstone', or sulphur, defines the
character of the fire. The Greek word
THEION translated 'brimstone' is
exactly the same word THEION which
means 'divine.' Sulphur was sacred to
the deity among the ancient Greeks;
and was used to fumigate, to purify,
and to cleanse and consecrate to the
deity; for this purpose they burned it
in their incense. In Homer's Iliad
(16:228), one is spoken of as purifying
a goblet with fire and brimstone. The
verb derived from THEION is
THEIOO, which means to hallow, to
make divine, or to dedicate to a god
(See Liddell and Scott Greek-English
Lexicon, 1897 Edition). To any Greek,
or any trained in the Greek language, a
'lake of fire and brimstone' would
mean a 'lake of divine purification.'
The idea of judgment need not be
excluded. Divine purification and
divine consecration are the plain
meaning in ancient Greek. In the
ordinary explanation, this
fundamental meaning of the word is
entirely left out, and nothing but
eternal torment is associated with it" -
end quote.
[Joseph Herrin’s note: As all who are studying these
matters are encouraged to do, I was not satisfied to
take another’s words on so important a matter, so I
went and checked out a couple of copies of "The
Iliad" by Homer from the local library. I went to the
section cited above, Book 16, line 228, and I found
it to be describing the time of the Trojan War. At
one point Achilles seeks the aid of Zeus (Jove), and
Achilles is depicted as getting out a sacred cup that
he used only for pouring forth a libation unto the
god, but first he cleanses it. Here is the line:
He took the cup from the chest and cleansed it
with sulphur (theion); this done he rinsed it in
clean water.
It is evident from this reading that sulphur
(brimstone) was viewed as an agent of divine
cleansing to the Greeks and Romans, and those
citizens of Rome during the early church age would
have understood this connection.]
I realize that the above thoughts define
the subject very briefly, but let us
summarize the meanings thus: BURN
means combustion; to change the form
of. FIRE means heat and light.
BRIMSTONE means divine. Putting
these three together can we not see
that the lake burning with fire and
brimstone is, actually, DIVINE HEAT
AND LIGHT PRODUCING A CHANGE! Is
such a process eternal?
All the laws of nature shout that it is
not! More than 2500 years ago the
Holy Spirit warned the wicked
inhabitants of Jerusalem that God
would kindle a fire at Jerusalem's gates
which would devour her palaces. "But
if you will not hearken unto Me... then
will I kindle a fire in the gates thereof,
and it shall devour the palaces of
Jerusalem, and it shall not he
quenched" (Jer. 17:27). Did not God
say this fire "shall NOT BE
QUENCHED?" This prophecy was
fulfilled and the fire did occur a few
years later and it did destroy all the
houses of Jerusalem (Jer. 52:13). Since
God said no person or thing would
"quench" this fire, did that mean that it
would burn for ever? Since it
accomplished the work it was sent to
do, and since it is NOT BURNING
TODAY, it obviously went out by itself
after accomplishing its purpose!
Unquenchable fire is not eternal fire -
it is simply fire that cannot be put out
until it has consumed or changed
everything it is possible for it to
change! It then simply goes out, for
there is nothing more to burn...
Are the judgments of God permanent?
Isaiah says, "When Your judgments are
in the earth, the inhabitants of the
world will learn righteousness" (Isa.
26:9). And Mat. 12:20 says, "A bruised
reed shall He not break, and smoking
flax shall He not quench, till He send
forth judgment unto victory."
Judgment, therefore, is not an eternal
condition, but it is given to produce
that victory. Judgments of themselves
do not save anyone, but they are used
by God to bring one to one's self, to
effect a change of attitude and will, to
consume away the stubbornness and
rebellion of men. Punishment by fire is
a beneficent one. "Our GOD is a
consuming fire" (Heb. 12:29). The
basic purpose of this divine fire of God
is to cleanse, purify, purge, temper and
change. It is to rid of impurities, of
filth, of undesirable elements. There is
no better way to deal with filth than to
deal with it by fire. The punishment by
penal fire leads back to the beginning
of things. The final work of God in this
world will be the destruction of the
world (order) by penal fire. That will
change all things. That will melt all the
elements, so that no man can tell you
where his original garb was. It will
burn up all the governments,
institutions, systems, and fruitage of
the carnal mind. It will melt all the
customs, cultures, traditions, and
practices of society and make of this
earth a new earth wherein dwells
righteousness. Every man's work will
eventually be tested in this fire. The
fire will try every man's work of what
sort it is. If you and I build into our
walls wood, hay, and stubble, that fire
will find it out, and the walls will come
tumbling down. When God turns on
the HEAT, the BLAZING LIGHT OF
HIS SPIRIT AND WORD - some things
begin to change! The fire is never sent
to destroy the PERSON, but to purge
out all that hinders and separates him
from his God, to consume the pride,
arrogance, hostility, defiance, and
rebellion of the flesh, the carnal mind,
that He might then be wooed and
drawn by the Holy Spirit unto the
Father of Spirits and live.
More than three centuries ago when
the Black Plague swept through
London, England, more than 68,000
men, women, and children were
sickened with the putrid fever, suffered
nameless agonies, passed into
delirium, sometimes with convulsions,
and then died. Before the end of the
terrible nightmare of anguish and
death, what was thought to be an even
greater tragedy occurred. The city
caught fire, the whole heavens were
ablaze as the Great Fire destroyed
more than 13,200 homes and 89
churches. Most of the city, which was
built largely of wood, lay in ashes.
Wonder of wonders! As soon as the last
dying embers cooled and the smoke
cleared, the inhabitants of the city
discovered that the Plague had been
stayed! Not another person died of the
epidemic. The Plague never returned.
The fire had killed the bacteria-
carrying fleas and rats that caused the
Plague. It took a fire to do it! Fire is a
great cleanser, purifier, and changer.
We all know that a horse must be
broken, that is, its will must be broken
before it is of any practical use to man.
God put that will in the horse, but it
must be broken and made to conform
to the will of man. Just as surely did
God put the will in man, BUT IT MUST
BE BROKEN and we will benefit by the
very process of breaking. Man may do
a lot of crying and wailing, but when
he is broken to HIS will, what a
wonderful condition it is. God may
take man over some rough places, even
through the lake of fire and brimstone,
but the love of God will break every
man to His will.
If you think the Kingdom of God is
rosewater, or eau-de-cologne, you are
mistaken. You cannot war on the devil
with that. You cannot war on the
carnal minds of men with that. You
have to make war on the world, the
flesh, and the devil with a sword
sharper than any two-edged sword.
You have to make war on the carnal
mind with fire, divine fire that must
burn up every inherent altar of Baal,
and lick up the very dust around. Make
no mistake! OUR GOD is a consuming
fire! He is man's "horse breaker" and
He will break you, precious friend of
mine, and bring you to the foot of the
cross of Jesus no matter how hot He
has to build the fire around you! Even
if long ages of fiery judgment and
tormenting darkness fall upon you,
they will last no longer than till the
Great Fire of God has melted all
arrogance into humility, and all that is
self has died in the bloody sweat and
all-saving cross of the Christ, which
will never give up its redeeming power
till sin and sinners have no more a
name among the creatures of God.
[end quote]
Returning once more to a statement made earlier in
this book, we quoted Solomon when he said, "For
the one with understanding, knowledge is easy." As
one casts off the myths of this leavened age that has
divorced itself from truth, and as one comes into a
clearer view of God’s plan of the ages, a plan that
leaves no loose ends, but which concludes with all
things being reconciled to God, one can then begin
to see many scriptures in a new light. Unquenchable
fire does not mean eternal fire as most of us have
been taught. There is purpose to the fire and
brimstone and these things are very symbolic, as is
most everything in scriptures.
One may wonder why these things are hidden from
so many. God doesn’t reveal His pearls of wisdom
indiscriminately. Yahshua spoke only to the people
in parables so that only those to whom
understanding was given would discern the true
meaning of His words. Every act and miracle of
Yahshua was likewise a parable that only those who
are given understanding will discern. God has
hidden His wisdom and it must be sought after,
called out for, and pursued with great diligence
(Proverbs 2). Furthermore, men must be doers of
the word. They must walk in the light they have
been given if they expect to be given more, "For to
whom much is given, much is required, and to he
who has shall more be given."
Our Father wants His children to walk in light, and
one day all will acknowledge the light and walk in it,
but the path will be harder for some than others. A
subtle truth is revealed in two types of sacrifices
which were offered under the Old Covenant. One
was a mandatory offering and the other was a
freewill offering. The freewill offering was burned
by fire and the smoke arose as a sweet aroma unto
the Father (Numbers 15). Because it was offered
freely, it was pleasing unto God.
However, the mandatory offering was not offered as
a pleasing aroma unto God. Because it did not arise
of a free will, but was mandated, it brought no
pleasure to God. In the same way, all of God’s
creation will be purged and purified as if through
fire, but only those who have freely offered
themselves as a living sacrifice upon the altar of God
will find that their aroma is pleasing to Him. Many
will suffer loss because they have not willingly
offered themselves to God, nor have they freely
allowed the fire of testing and suffering to burn
away that which is not of God.
God has a plan of the ages and the end will be the
reconciliation of all things, but those who would be
accounted worthy to rule and reign with Christ,
those who would have access to the very presence of
God and to His most holy things, must allow Him to
purify them of their own free will. Much will be
burned up and many will suffer loss, but to those
who do not shrink back from the Father’s purifying
process there will be great reward.
May many sons come forth to share in the glory of
God and of His Christ.
God so Loves the World
My family and I have noted a certain phenomenon
that I suspect many who read this have also noted.
We have owned quite a number of different cars
since my wife and I have been married, and
whenever we would purchase a particular type of
car, we would begin noticing all the other cars on
the road that are like it. Usually we had never paid
attention to all the cars that were similar to our own
until we purchased one, and then we would see
them everywhere. In jesting with one another we
would even say things like, "There we are, right up
ahead of us", or "There’s our car again." Of course it
would not be our car, but it would be one that
looked like the one we were now driving.
It is quite amazing that we would begin to notice all
of these cars, when, before we purchased one for
ourselves, we were totally oblivious to their
presence. It was not that all of these cars suddenly
showed up, but that our eyes were now trained and
alert to spot them. This same phenomenon reaches
into many realms. One such realm is the Word of
God.
Have you ever noted that when God opens your eyes
to some Scriptural truth that you immediately begin
to see a profusion of supporting Scriptures that had
been there all along, but you had been glancing
right over them? I have experienced this numerous
times. For example, when God opened my eyes to
the significance of numbers in Scripture this
occurred. Before I understood that all numbers were
significant and held great meaning before Yahweh,
I had just thought they were random numbers.
I didn’t perceive that there was any real significance
to the fact that Jacob had twelve sons. Twelve was
just a number. But once I understood that all
numbers were significant, and that this number
represents God’s calling and election, then I began
to see it everywhere. I saw that Yahshua also
selected twelve men to be His disciples, for this was
also according to divine calling and election. I saw
that the Overcomers in Revelation numbered
144,000 which is twelve thousand from each of the
twelve tribes of Israel, again representing divine
calling and election. I also saw that the New
Jerusalem has twelve gates, and only those who are
holy can enter the city, so these twelve gates once
more represent divine calling and election, for they
only allow entrance to those whom Yahweh has
declared clean.
Once the Spirit of God opens our eyes to some truth
we then begin seeing it everywhere. This applies
equally to the truth of the reconciliation of the
entire creation to Christ, namely that "in Christ God
was reconciling the world unto Himself." This verse
is merely one more example of the phenomenon of
which I am speaking. Before my eyes were opened
to understand God’s plan of the ages, which ends
with all things being summed up in Christ, I had
glossed right over this Scripture and many others.
Yet when I "bought into" the truth, just like I had
bought a car in the analogy given, I began seeing
similar things everywhere.
The verse I just quoted was there on the pages of my
Bible all the time, but my eyes had not fastened
upon it. The Father had to open my eyes before I
could see what had been plainly before me all the
time. This particular Scripture is very precious, and
very affirming of the truth of the ultimate
reconciliation of the entire world, and it also speaks
of the awesome love of God.
II Corinthians 5:18-19
Now all these things are from God, who reconciled
us to Himself through Christ and gave us the
ministry of reconciliation, namely, that God was in
Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not
counting their trespasses against them, and
He has committed to us the word of reconciliation.
This Scripture is just like many of the other
Scriptures we have looked at. It proclaims the same
message as the Scriptures that state,
I Timothy 4:10
For it is for this we labor and strive, because we
have fixed our hope on the living God, who is the
Savior of ALL MEN, especially of believers.
Titus 2:11
For the grace of God has appeared, bringing
salvation to ALL MEN...
When we read that Christ is reconciling the world to
Himself, we can understand that this phrase "the
world" includes all men, for this is stated in many
places. But before we came to understand God’s
plan of reconciliation, while we were under the false
teaching that only a remnant will be reconciled to
God, while the rest will remain unreconciled in
endless torments throughout eternal ages, we would
read right over such verses as if they were invisible
and hidden from our sight. When understanding is
granted, however, Scriptures that proclaim this
truth begin popping up all over, and we may think,
"Where did all these verses come from all of a
sudden?" The answer is that they did not just now
make their appearance. They had been there all the
time, yet they lay unnoticed. Following are a few
more of these same type of Scriptures that had
formerly lain unnoticed before my eyes.
John 1:29
The next day he saw Yahshua coming to him and
said, "Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away
the sin of the world!
John 4:41-42
Many more believed because of His word; and they
were saying to the woman, "It is no longer because
of what you said that we believe, for we have heard
for ourselves and know that this One is indeed
the Savior of the world."
I John 4:14
We have seen and testify that the Father has sent
the Son to be the Savior of the world.
John 12:47
If anyone hears My sayings and does not keep them,
I do not judge him; for I did not come to judge
the world, but to save the world.
Is it not incredible that the majority of the modern
church has not perceived the presence and meaning
of so many verses that proclaim this truth, namely
that Christ came and laid down His life for all men,
that all men’s sins were forgiven, that He did not
come to condemn any, but to save all, and that
when God’s plan of the ages is complete we will see
all men reconciled to God th rough the cross of
Christ? How is it that we have missed the presence
of so many Scriptures that all affirm the same truth?
All it takes is for our minds to be prejudiced against
the truth, and then we will surely fail to see it. When
we do not expect to see something, we will almost
always fail to see it though it is right before us.
I will share another phenomenon that I am certain
many others have also noted, which has bearing
upon this matter. There have been times when I
have been looking for some object and I could not
find it. I may have searched all over the house and
it had eluded me. I would then ask my wife Tony if
she had any knowledge of where the item might be.
She may tell me that it is in the bedroom and I
should go there and look, yet I would doubt her
word for I had no remembrance of having taken the
item into the bedroom. Yet I would go look anyway,
only to come out and say, "Tony, it is not in the
bedroom." My wife would then come into the
bedroom and walk right over to where the item lay,
often in plain sight, and she would hand it to me.
How did I miss it? I did not expect to find it in the
place where it lay, so my mind looked right over it
without recognition. I formerly gave this illustration
to my college students to whom I was teaching the
principles of computer repair. I was stressing to
them how important attitude is, for if we have
confidence that we will find the source of a problem
and be able to correct it, then we will almost always
succeed. However, if my students approached a
computer problem with the attitude that computers
were complicated and intimidating and they
doubted that they could determine the source of a
problem and be able to correct it, then in most cases
they would not succeed in the task before them.
When they did not expect to be able to correct a
problem, they would overlook even very obvious
things, such as an unplugged cable.
The church has conditioned most saints today to not
expect to find a message of the reconciliation of all
of creation in the Scriptures. I have heard a
thousand sermons where ministers have spoken of
eternal damnation, eternal torment, and eternal
separation from God, and all of this repetition has a
profound effect upon the minds of the saints.
Having been told by respected ministers that there
is no message of reconciliation for all of mankind in
the Bible, the saints can read the Scriptures that
proclaim a message of God’s love for the entire
world and it will lie invisible before their eyes.
Consider the case of the verse from which the name
of this chapter is derived. John 3:16 is the most
memorized verse from all of Scripture. It is often
the very first verse a child is taught. We see it on
posters at sporting events and prominently
displayed in other public venues. Millions of
Christians can quote it perfectly, yet few have ever
really seen the verse. Though it is recorded in their
brain, and it rolls easily off of their tongue, the
sense of the verse is hidden from most. What does
it say?
John 3:16
For God so loved the world, that He gave His
only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him
shall not perish, but have eternal life.
Many saints have memorized the next verse as well.
John 3:17
For God did not send the Son into the world
to judge the world, but that the world might
be saved through Him.
Our problem is that we do not see all men
reconciled to God in this life and this age, and not
perceiving that God has a plan that spans many
ages, which will not be complete until all things are
summed up in Christ, until Christ Himself is
subjected to the Father so that He is all in all, we
deny the plain witness of that which is right before
us. We have allowed men to convince us that there
is no message of the reconciliation of all men, or of
the world, or of the entire creation in Scriptures,
and having become prejudiced to believe a lie, we
fail to see the truth. Like a man who walks into a
room not expecting to find the thing he is searching
for, we search the Scriptures for truth and seldom
find it.
Once our eyes are opened, once we have bought into
the truth, we begin to see things that were there all
the time, but which our mind had filtered out and
overlooked. I would like to share just a couple of the
things that have been "hidden" in plain sight in the
Word of God. I did not see them until my eyes were
opened, and you may have experienced the same.
Having been taught that only a remnant of mankind
will be saved, and the vast majority will endure
unending torment never to be reconciled to God,
many of us have glossed right over these things.
We need not go far in Scripture before we see a
great testimony of God’s plan to redeem all
mankind. Adam and his wife having sinned in the
Garden of Eden are met by God, and because they
have become aware of their nakedness they hide
themselves. We then read:
Genesis 3:21
Yahweh God made garments of skin for Adam and
his wife, and clothed them.
Those who have been taught that Yahweh is an
angry God looking for the smallest transgression
that He might strike men may have trouble
understanding what He did here. Having just heard
the man and woman declare their disobedience,
having just learned that they chose a path of sin that
would produce unimaginable woes and tragedy and
heartache for thousands of years to come, God acts
mercifully to the man and woman by covering their
nakedness. Yahweh made garments of skins for
Adam and his wife, and He clothed them.
What I want to point out in this event is much more
than that God acted mercifully to these two sinners,
though this is a very important point. In Scripture
we see a principle of representation where what is
done, or promised to one man, applies to all who
come after him who are of his seed. We read of this
principle in the following passage.
Hebrew s 7:9-10
And, so to speak, through Abraham even Levi, who
received tithes, paid tithes, for he was still in the
loins of his father when Melchizedek met him.
This passage is speaking about the time when
Abraham met Melchizedek after Abraham returned
from the battle of the three kings and had rescued
his nephew Lot and those who were with him.
Abraham upon meeting Melchizedek, the priest of
Salem, paid tithes to him. At this point Levi had not
even been born, for Levi was several generations
removed from Abraham. To Abraham was born
Isaac, and to Isaac was born Jacob, and to Jacob
was born Levi. Abraham did not live to see his
grandson Jacob, much less his great grandson Levi,
yet Paul says that because Levi was in the loins of
Abraham, that is to say that Levi was of Abraham’s
seed, that what Abraham did was ascribed to Levi.
This is an extremely important principle in
Scripture. This principle of representation is what
salvation through our identification with Christ is
built upon. Because we were in Christ (by faith we
believe this) when He suffered for sin, died, was
buried and rose again, what He accomplished is
imputed to us. His death has become our death. His
resurrection has become our resurrection. His
righteousness has become our righteousness.
Understanding this principle of representation, let
us look one more time at what occurred in the
garden.
When Yahweh made a covering for Adam and his
wife, He did not just do so for Adam (whose name
means ‘man’), but He did so for all those who were
in Adam’s loins. Yahweh provided a covering for all
men, for all were in Adam. This covering was a
shadow, or type, of the covering that God would
later provide for the salvation of all mankind which
was realized in Christ.
Galatians 3:27
For all of you who were baptized into Christ have
clothed yourselves with Christ.
We are told that Yahweh made garments for Adam
and his wife from the skins of animals, and though
we are not told what kind of animal it was, I would
not be surprised to learn that the garments were
made from sheepskins, or goatskins. This covering
that God provided points to the sacrifice that would
one day fully cover the sinful flesh of man and
remove mankind’s nakedness before God. To make
these garments Yahweh had to slay an animal, and
blood had to be shed, and this points once more to
the sacrifice of His Son.
What is present, but often missed in this account, is
that in providing a covering for Adam (man), God
provided a covering for all those who would be born
of man. No one was left out in this act of mercy. All
mankind was covered in Adam, and one day all men
would be covered in Christ.
Romans 5:18-19
So then as through one transgression there resulted
condemnation to all men, even so through one act
of righteousness there resulted justification of life to
all men. For as through the one man's disobedience
the many were made sinners, even so through the
obedience of the One the many will be made
righteous.
God’s act of mercy toward Adam and his wife
pointed to a future act of mercy that would provide
a covering for all mankind. This leads to a second
type that I would like to look at, and this is the
mercy seat that covered the ark of the covenant. The
translators of our Bibles have chosen to call it a
mercy "seat", possibly because the glory of God
rested upon it, but this lid that covered the ark was
not designed as a throne, or chair. The Hebrew
word the translators rendered as "seat" is "kaporet"
which is literally translated as "covering ". It also
literally acted as a lid, or covering for the ark. So the
mercy seat is more literally translated as mercy
covering.
Every minute detail of the Tabernacle and it’s
furnishings carries great symbolic meaning. The ark
of the covenant represents the heart of man where
God was to dwell. In the ark was placed the tablets
of the Law and this is a picture of God placing His
law in our hearts. Yet the ark required a covering.
The ark was not complete without this covering, and
the covering was a separate piece. This was all
intentional, for in some of the furnishings God gave
explicit instructions that they were to be made
entirely of one piece, while others were of more than
one piece. The ark, typifying the heart of man, was
not complete without the mercy covering being
placed upon it. This mercy covering is the blood of
Christ, as revealed in the following verses.
Leviticus 16:15
Then he shall slaughter the goat of the sin offering
which is for the people, and bring its blood inside
the veil and do with its blood as he did with the
blood of the bull, and sprinkle it on the mercy seat
(literal, ‘covering’) and in front of the mercy seat
(literal, ‘covering’).
I Peter 1:2
According to the foreknowledge of God the Father,
by the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to obey Christ
Yahshua and be sprinkled with His blood...
Hebrews 12:24
And to Yahshua, the mediator of a new covenant,
and to the sprinkled blood, which speaks better than
the blood of Abel.
In pointing out these things, that God provided a
merciful covering to Adam and his wife out of the
skins of animals that had to be slain, and that the
ark of the covenant representing man’s heart also
had a mercy covering upon it, which points to the
shed blood of Christ, I want to lead you to one more
verse that reveals the scope of this mercy covering.
The verse is commonly rendered in this way:
I John 2:1-2
My little children, I am writing these things to you
so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have
an Advocate with the Father, Christ Yahshua the
righteous; and He Himself is the propitiation
for our sins; and not for ours only, but also
for those of the whole world.
Many people stumble over the word "propitiation"
in this verse, for it is not a word that we commonly
use today. I have recently come to understand that
it is also a poor translation. I am grateful to the
brother who pointed this out to me. The word
rendered propitiation is the Greek "hilasmos" and is
Strong’s NT 2434. Another form of this same word
is Strong’s NT 2435, and we find it used in the
following verse.
Hebrew s 9:5
And above it were the cherubim of glory
overshadowing the mercy seat; but of these things
we cannot now speak in detail.
Here this word is translated "mercy seat" instead of
propitiation, and as we have seen, "mercy seat"
should be properly rendered as "mercy covering".
Let us look once more at the Scripture from I John,
and let us replace the word propitiation with mercy
covering.
I John 2:1-2
My little children, I am writing these things to you
so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have
an Advocate with the Father, Christ Yahshua the
righteous; and He Himself is the mercy
covering for our sins; and not for ours only,
but also for those of the w hole world.
Consider now how this verse forms a parallel to
what we have looked at in the Garden of Eden. After
Adam and his wife sinned, Yahweh in His mercy
provided a covering for them. This covering
garment made from the skin of a slain animal
pointed to the mercy covering that would one day
be made in Christ which would cover all of
mankind. This same image is revealed in the ark of
the covenant and the mercy covering that was
placed over it, upon which was sprinkled the blood
of the sin offering. Christ is the sin offering, and His
blood acts as a mercy covering for all of mankind.
John tells us that this Yahshua "is the mercy
covering for our sins, and not for ours only, but also
for those of the whole world."
We see then that as far back as the Garden of Eden,
immediately after the first transgression, Yahweh
symbolically revealed that a mercy covering would
one day be provided for all of mankind. This
covering was further revealed in the mercy covering
that was placed over the ark of the covenant, and it
is seen fulfilled in Christ who has poured out His
blood as a mercy covering for our sins, and not for
ours only, but also for those of the whole
world.
Saints, these things have been in plain sight, yet we
have missed them because we did not expect to find
them in Scripture. Many more are the things that
we have failed to discern, but I pray that Yahweh
would open our eyes to see, and unstop our ears
that we might hear.
The Glorious Gospel
In the introduction to this book I mentioned that
there have been those who have accused me of
heresy in teaching the truth of the ultimate
reconciliation of the entire creation. One thing that
has brought forth this charge is the prevailing
doctrine that men must be saved right now, during
this age, while they are still clothed in sinful flesh. It
is taught that if any man fails to take advantage of
this opportunity, then he has missed his one shot at
salvation, and he must burn in Hell as an evildoer
for all eternity.
This "one shot gospel" is the prevailing teaching
today, and if anyone challenges this concept they
will incite charges of heresy. It is not a bad thing to
be branded a heretic if everyone else is walking in
error. Yet I am grieved at the charges of heresy, for
those making this charge do not know their
scriptures. Let us examine a few pertinent Bible
verses.
II Corinthians 5:20-6:3
Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though
God were entreating through us; we beg you on
behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God. He made
Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, that
we might become the righteousness of God in Him.
And working together with Him, we also urge you
not to receive the grace of God in vain-- for He
says,"At the acceptable time I listened to you, and
on the day of salvation I helped you"; behold, now
is "the acceptable time," behold, now is "the
day of salvation."
Some have used this Scripture to teach that
salvation is limited to one’s existence in the flesh,
and that it is available only now in the church age.
Yet this is not what Paul is saying at all. What would
become of all those men, women and children who
lived and died in the 4,000 years before Christ
appeared? These did not hear the gospel, for the
gospel was not preached until Christ. We also read
that God’s plan of the ages was hidden from those
who lived in previous times. What Paul is saying, as
he quotes from the prophet Isaiah, is that "now", at
this time, salvation has been made known. What
was formerly a mystery, though typified by various
observances such as the Feast of Passover, is now
revealed. Salvation is now seen to be in Christ. Paul
echoes this sentiment in his writing to Titus.
Titus 2:11
For the grace of God has now appeared, bringing
salvation to all men...
The acceptable time and day of salvation began
when Christ went to the cross and bore the sins of
ALL mankind. This salvation is for ALL men, even
those who lived before the time of Christ, but it was
not made known until Christ died. How very plain
are Paul’s words to Titus, "For the grace of God has
now appeared, BRINGING SALVATION TO ALL
MEN...." Yet this truth is almost universally denied
by the church today. The church says that salvation
is for a few, and the majority will never be saved.
They will spend eternity in Hell (Which is
impossible since we have seen that Hell itself will be
cast into the Lake of Fire and perish.)
The Scriptures do teach that NOW is the time to
present oneself as a freewill offering, a living
sacrifice upon the altar of God. NOW is the time to
live in such a way as to merit reward at the return of
Christ. If a person misses this opportunity they will
forfeit much that is beyond estimable value. We are
told that:
Revelation 22:12
"Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is
with Me, to render to every man according to what
he has done."
If one does not avail themselves of the opportunities
in this lifetime to earn this reward, they will suffer
loss, but they will be saved.
I Corinthians 3:15
If any man's work is burned up, he will suffer loss;
but he himself will be saved, yet so as through fire.
If we insist on teaching a one shot gospel that leaves
the vast multitudes of this world suffering in Hell
for all eternity, then what do we make of verses such
as Paul’s above that says that the grace of God has
appeared bringing salvation to ALL men? In the
introduction to this book I listed a number of
Scriptures that bear this meaning out, and because
the truth is so seldom preached I do not feel it
would be mere redundancy to repeat these verses
again. We need to look at these verses and
understand them.
I Timothy 2:3-4
This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our
Savior, who desires ALL MEN to be saved and to
come to the knowledge of the truth.
I Timothy 4:10
For it is for this we labor and strive, because we
have fixed our hope on the living God, who is the
Savior of ALL MEN, especially of believers.
Titus 2:11
For the grace of God has appeared, bringing
salvation to ALL MEN...
Romans 5:18
So then as through one transgression there resulted
condemnation to ALL MEN, even so through one
act of righteousness there resulted justification of
life to ALL MEN.
Undoubtedly, this teaching casts down one of the
five main tenets of Calvinism, that of Limited
Atonement. Atonement is UNLIMITED. The
sacrifice of Christ is omnipotently effective. It is
infinite in its scope.
Colossians 1:19-20
For it was the Father's good pleasure for all the
fullness to dwell in Him, and through Him to
reconcile all things to Himself, having made
peace through the blood of His cross; through Him,
I say, whether things on earth or things in
heaven.
If ALL THINGS are to be summed up in Christ, then
ultimately ALL THINGS must be reconciled to God
through the cross of Christ. Nothing is excepted. We
do not see this reconciliation in this age, and vast
multitudes have been led to adopt doctrines that
declare that if reconciliation does not come to any
member of creation in this age, they will have no
more opportunity to be saved. What a grievous
thing this is, and one that is disproved in many
places in Scripture. Consider the message of the
following passage.
I Peter 3:18-4:6
For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just
for the unjust, so that He might bring us to God,
having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive
in the spirit; in which also He went and made
proclamation to the spirits now in prison,
who once were disobedient, when the
patience of God kept waiting in the days of
Noah, during the construction of
a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely
through the water... For the gospel has for this
purpose been preached even to those who
are dead, that though they are judged in the
flesh as men, they may live in the spirit
according to the will of God.
Note that Peter begins by telling us that Christ died
for sins, "once FOR ALL, the just for the unjust."
This truth is throughout the pages of the Bible. He
then proceeds to tell us a marvelous thing. After His
death, Christ went and proclaimed the gospel to the
spirits of dead men who were kept in prison, men
who had perished in the days of Noah when Yahweh
judged the earth with the flood. Peter tells us that
the gospel has "been peached even to those who are
dead." Why was it preached to them? That "they
may live in the spirit according to the will of God."
This passage completely overturns the doctrine of a
one shot gospel. These men had listened to the
preaching of Noah, and they had rejected it. They
died in their sins. Yet Christ went and preached the
gospel to these who had been kept in chains for so
long due to their great sin, and He preached the
gospel to them that they might live in the spirit
according to the will of God. What is this will of
God?
II Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as
some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to
us-ward, not willing that any should perish,
but that all should come to repentance.
I Timothy 2:3-4
This is good and acceptable in the sight of
God our Savior, who desires ALL MEN to be
saved and to come to the knowledge of the
truth.
It is the will of God that all should come to
repentance. It is the will of God that ALL should be
saved and come to the knowledge of the truth. Let
us revisit one more time Yahweh’s emphatic
declaration that He made with an oath, recorded in
the book of Isaiah.
Isaiah 45:22-23
"Turn to Me and be saved, all the ends of the earth;
For I am God, and there is no other. I have sworn by
Myself, the word has gone forth from My mouth in
righteousness and will not turn back, that to Me
EVERY KNEE will bow, EVERY TONGUE will
swear allegiance."
This is the glorious gospel of Christ. Through the
cross of Yahshua, ALL things whether in heaven, or
on earth, will be reconciled to God the Father. There
are many proofs we could give in this matter, but let
us look at just one more. The Scriptures teach that
ALL Israel will be saved, as we see in the following
verses:
Romans 11:25-27
For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed
of this mystery, lest you be wise in your own
estimation, that a partial hardening has happened
to Israel until the fulness of the Gentiles has come
in; and thus all Israel will be saved; just as it
is written, "The Deliverer will come from Zion, He
will remove ungodliness from Jacob. And this is My
covenant with them, when I take away their sins."
Lest some should try to spiritualize this passage and
say that this refers only to spiritual Israel, we should
note that it is speaking of the same Israel in which
"a partial hardening has happened." This is natural
Israel. Paul declares that in the end "all Israel will be
saved." Now compare this with the message of the
following verses.
Matthew 11:21-24
Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For
if the miracles had occurred in Tyre and Sidon
which occurred in you, they would have repented
long ago in sackcloth and ashes. Nevertheless I say
to you, it will be more tolerable for Tyre and
Sidon in the day of judgment than for you.
And you, Capernaum, will not be exalted to heaven,
will you? You will descend to Hades; for if the
miracles had occurred in Sodom which occurred in
you, it would have remained to this day.
Nevertheless I say to you that it will be more
tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of
judgment, than for you.
Yahshua spoke these words over the cities of Israel,
cities that had rejected the preaching of the gospel.
He declared that it would be more tolerable for the
citizens of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for
these unbelieving Jewish cities.
If Paul tells us that ALL Israel will eventually be
saved, and he says that Sodom’s judgment will be
less than the unbelieving Israelites, then what does
this say about Sodom? They too will be saved. They
will endure Hell. They will endure the Lake of Fire,
but when all that is not of God has been purged,
purified and consumed they will then be saved "yet
as through fire".
If one believes that all transgressors will share the
same fate in Hell, or the Lake of Fire, and they also
believe that none will ever escape, then how can it
be "more tolerable for Sodom in the day of
judgment" than for the cities of Israel? It cannot.
They would all alike share the same judgment,
unending torment. Yet, as we have seen, the
Scriptures do not teach unending torment.
There are many Scriptures that cannot be explained
when one adopts doctrines that teach that men,
women and children have one shot at salvation, and
having missed it they will then be consigned to
eternal torment. Yahweh is a just God and He will
punish sin, and do so severely. He is also a holy
God, and He will have everything that stands in
opposition to His holiness burned up and
consumed. Yet, He is not a vindictive God. He does
not find delight and pleasure in the punishment of
the wicked.
Ezekiel 18:23, 32
Do I have any pleasure at all that the wicked should
die?" says Yahweh GOD, "and not that he should
turn from his ways and live..." For I have no
pleasure in the death of one who dies," says Yahweh
GOD.
Ezekiel 33:11
Say to them: 'As I live,' says Yahweh GOD, 'I have no
pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the
wicked turn from his way and live. Turn, turn from
your evil ways! For why should you die, O house of
Israel?'
The glorious gospel of the reconciliation of the
entire creation can be summed up in one verse. It is
a verse that expresses the very heart and character
of God, whose mercies are new every morning. The
Scripture is this:
James 2:13
Mercy triumphs over judgment.
David, the man who had a heart after God’s own,
expressed his confidence in God’s ultimate mercy
with these words:
Psalms 85:1-7
O Yahweh, You showed favor to Your land; You
restored the captivity of Jacob.
You forgave the iniquity of Your people; You
covered all their sin. Selah.
You withdrew all Your fury; You turned away from
Your burning anger.
Restore us, O God of our salvation, and cause Your
indignation toward us to cease.
Will You be angry with us forever? Will You prolong
Your anger to all generations?
Will You not Yourself revive us again, that Your
people may rejoice in You?
Show us Your lovingkindness, O Yahweh, and grant
us Your salvation.
"Will You be angry with us forever? Will you
prolong Your anger to all generations?" The anger of
Yahweh will burn fiercely until it consumes all that
stands in opposition to His character and will, yet
this too is the mercy of God. It would be unmerciful
to leave the creation groaning under the curse of sin
for all eternity.
Which God do you serve; One whose judgment will
never be quenched, whose anger will last forever, or
One whose mercy triumphs over judgment?
Show us Your lovingkindness, O Yahweh, and grant
us Your salvation.
Selah - pause and consider.
A Full Salvation
I Timothy 4:10
For it is for this we labor and strive, because we
have fixed our hope on the living God, who is the
Savior of all men, especially of believers.
Have you ever tried to explain what this verse
means? It is pretty difficult if one does not discern
the ultimate reconciliation of mankind. We have a
God who is the Savior of ALL men. This is easily
understood in the context of the message of this
book, but what does it mean when it states
"especially of believers"? How is salvation of a
higher order for believers than for unbelievers?
Answering this question will remove much of the
criticism of those who say that preaching universal
reconciliation will cause people to lead careless
lives, and who declare that it will remove the
urgency for mankind to be saved in this life.
When we talk of salvation, we must not only define
who will be saved, we must define what salvation
itself really is. The scriptures speak of Christ saving
men from their sin. It also speaks of being saved
from the judgment to come. These things are of
course linked together. It is because of sin that there
is judgment. Every man born of Adam is headed for
judgment due to the fact that they were born a
sinner from a sinful lineage. The Scriptures also
reveal that all men are tri-part beings, body, soul
and spirit.
I Thessalonians 5:23
Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you
entirely; and may your spirit and soul and body
be preserved complete, without blame at the coming
of our Lord Jesus Christ.
This verse is a real key in understanding the
salvation of man. Man needs to be saved at three
levels, body, soul and spirit. Paul says that Christ
desires to sanctify us entirely, that is, at all three
levels, that we would have no blame and be
preserved complete at the coming of Christ. Let us
tie this in with the verse above that states "God is the
Savior of ALL men, especially of believers." All men
will be saved at one of these levels, but the greatest
salvation will belong to those who allow God to save
them at all three levels. This is why it says,
especially of believers.
It is believers who submit to the sanctifying work of
God in their lives at all levels. Actually, it would be
more accurate to state that believers are given the
opportunity to be saved at all three levels. Not all
saints do so, however. Many are called, but few are
chosen. Some believers resist the grace of God and
His sanctifying work in them. Therefore we see that
some will share a place in the Lake of Fire with the
unbelievers. They could have been SAVED
(delivered) from this "second death" by presenting
themselves as a living sacrifice in this life, by taking
up the disciple's cross, but many choose to protect
their soul and fleshly life, and therefore they will
suffer loss in these two realms where they could have
known complete salvation. I believe this is what Paul
is speaking of in the following verses:
I Corinthians 3:15
If any man's work is burned up, he will suffer loss;
but he himself will be saved, yet so as
through fire.
I Corinthians 5:5
I have decided to deliver such a one to Satan for the
destruction of his flesh, so that his spirit may be
saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.
Both of these verses are written to saints, and they
speak of them receiving salvation at different levels.
It is the will of God that His saints be saved at all
three levels, but it is evident some will not. Some will
suffer loss, and who can calculate the extent of this
loss?! Spirit salvation is a free gift of God. This is the
salvation that Ephesians speaks of in the following
verses:
Ephesians 2:8-9
For by grace you have been saved through
faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;
not as a result of works, so that no one may
boast.
Where many of the arguments of Christianity arise,
faith versus works, Calvinism versus Arminianism,
is at this very point. Many saints do not discern that
the Scriptures speak of a tri-part salvation. They can
read a passage such as these verses in Ephesians
and see that salvation is strictly by faith, with no
works involved. They fail to identify this salvation as
spirit salvation only. We then come to other verses,
such as the following which paint a different
picture.
Philippians 2:12-13
So then, my beloved, just as you have always
obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much
more in my absence, work out your salvation
with fear and trembling; for it is God who is at
work in you, both to will and to work for His good
pleasure.
There are numerous verses that could be cited that
paint both sides of this picture. Just read any
writing on faith versus works and you will see a
multitude of Scriptures that speak things that are on
the surface contradictory. The problem comes in
when the saints try to take verses that speak of the
salvation of the soul, which must be worked out in
the process of sanctification, and they contrast them
with verses that speak of the salvation of the spirit
which is a free gift of God and is not related to
works. By not understanding the three levels on
which God desires men to be saved, the saints get
into many needless arguments.
I will give an evidence here that the salvation that is
a free gift is speaking of "spirit salvation" which
occurs at the moment one is born again of the Spirit
of God.
John 3:6
"That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that
which is born of the Spirit is spirit."
When we see this tied in with the following verse,
we can readily see that this is the same salvation
Paul speaks of in Ephesians 2:8, 9.
John 1:12-13
But as many as received Him, to them He gave the
right to become children of God, even to those
who believe in His name, who were born,
not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of
the will of man, but of God.
This verse declares that man's will did not enter into
this salvation. It is a free gift of God. "Salvation
belongs to our God", and He dispenses it to whom
He desires. So we see that spirit salvation is given
without any merit on man's part. Yahshua told
Nicodemus that a man cannot even see the
Kingdom until after he has been born again, and a
man cannot desire what he cannot see. Christ also
said that no one could come to the Him unless the
Spirit draws him. So this spirit salvation is both
initiated and performed completely by God, and our
only work is to believe.
This is not true of salvation at the other levels,
however. Soul salvation and body salvation must be
worked out. In the following verse we see Paul
speaking of a further salvation beyond that of being
born again of the Spirit.
Hebrews 9:28
so Christ also, having been offered once to bear
the sins of many, will appear a second time for
salvation without reference to sin, to those
who eagerly await Him.
Paul is saying that there will be a further salvation
at Christ's next appearing, but it will not be a taking
away of sin as was seen at His first appearing when
He went to the cross. This next salvation will be a
soul salvation, and note that Paul does not say it is
for everyone. He says Christ will appear with this
salvation "to those who eagerly await Him." This is
not the virgins who are sleeping, but the Bride who
is alert and watching. The Bride is those who have
allowed Christ to do His purifying and cleansing
work in their lives here in this life. They have not
fled from the cross. They have not sought to save
their soul life, resulting in losing it. Rather, they
have laid down their soul life and died to the things
of self that they might gain true life at Christ's
appearing. This is also what John speaks of:
I John 3:2-3
Beloved, now we are children of God, and it has not
appeared as yet what we will be. We know that
when He appears, we will be like Him,
because we will see Him just as He is. And
everyone who has this hope fixed on Him
purifies himself, just as He is pure.
John, like Paul, is speaking of the return of Christ
for a second salvation, a salvation of the soul. Not all
will attain to this salvation. Some who have not
purified themselves will endure the second death of
the Lake of Fire. There will be weeping and wailing
and gnashing of teeth, even among the saints.
When we were born again of the Spirit, we became
a divided house. We found that we now had the seed
of God inside of us, and that which was born of the
Spirit, our spirit, now joyfully concurs with the rule
of God. Our spirit man seeks to please God at all
times, yet we still are clothed in sinful flesh which is
always lusting against the spirit. We are
experiencing warfare in our members, and our soul
is caught in the middle. The flesh wants to rule the
soul, and the spirit wants to rule the soul. If we
desire to experience full salvation then we must
crucify our flesh, rule over it, buffet our bodies, and
bring our soul into subjection to the spirit. If we fail
to do so, then we will not benefit from the full
salvation Christ desires for us.
At this very time we are caught in that period that
Hosea wrote of:
Hosea 6:1-2
Come, let us return to the LORD. For He has torn
us, but He will heal us; He has wounded us, but He
will bandage us. "He will revive us after two days;
He will raise us up on the third day, that we may live
before Him.
At Christ's first appearing, the Spirit was given and
man experienced spirit birth. Man became a divided
house ("He has torn us") and we now find warfare
raging in our members. Can you imagine how awful
it would be to never know an end to this warfare?
Man does not know true rest at this time for his
make-up will not allow him to rest. If man is not
ever diligent, if he does not choose to walk
circumspectly and to be ever alert, his flesh will rise
up and take control of his soul. Every day we must
give our bodies over to death that the life of Christ
might be manifested in and through us.
Yet this condition will not last forever. We are
promised that after two days, two thousand years in
God’s plan, He will revive us and make us whole. He
will raise us up on the third day. It has now been
nearly two thousand years since man first became a
torn and divided house, for it was on Pentecost that
the Spirit was given and this inner warfare
commenced. Yahshua also spoke of His body
working out their soul salvation for two thousand
years, and afterwards being perfected and made
whole, though His words are hardly recognized in
this way today.
Luke 13:32
And he said unto them, Go ye, and tell that fox,
Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures to day
and to morrow, and the third day I shall be
perfected.
Christ was speaking of more than His crucifixion
here. He was speaking of His body of believers. For
two days the body of Christ has cast out devils and
performed cures, often on themselves, but they have
not been perfected. Christianity has always been
leavened with sin, and saints have always been
divided vessels where warfare has raged in their
members. But on the third day we are promised that
we shall be perfected. We shall experience soul
salvation, if we are ready and waiting.
Let us look one more time now at this verse that
declares God to be the Savior of all men, especially
of believers. I believe it is saying that all men will be
saved at one of the three levels, but those who
believe, and who consequently obey, subjecting
themselves to the sanctifying work of God in this
life, will experience the fullest salvation from Christ.
It will be tragic indeed for those who realize what a
great and complete salvation they have forfeited.
Many could be spared the second death, but the
only way to be spared from it is to allow Christ to
work a death in your soul life in this time in which
we now live. Those who do so will receive great
reward. As a freewill offering, their sacrifice of
obedience will ascend as a fragrant aroma in the
nostrils of God. Paul says that the "momentary light
afflictions of this time are not worthy to be
compared with the glory to be revealed in us." Not
all will have this glory revealed in them, however,
for many are fleeing from any voluntary affliction of
their soul life. They want to protect their soul life.
They want to live for self. One day soon their works
will be tested as with fire and all that is wood, hay
and stubble will be burned up. Great loss will be had
by many. Their soul will be saved, yet as through
fire.
Salvation actually holds a similar meaning as the
word deliverance. Would you be spared the second
death of the Lake of Fire? Would you like to be
delivered from great loss and receive reward at the
coming of Christ? Then you must work out your
soul salvation with fear and trembling. You must
submit yourself to the purging and purifying work
of God. Daniel prophesied of these days:
Daniel 12:9-10
Go your way, Daniel, for these words are
concealed and sealed up until the end time. Many
will be purged, purified and refined, but the wicked
will act wickedly; and none of the wicked will
understand, but those who have insight will
understand.
How many today truly understand these things?
Daniel was told that the wicked would not
understand, but there would be some to whom
insight is given. These will submit to the refining of
God. Though it may seem intense, and at times
beyond bearing, Paul assures us that in the light of
the glory to come that these are but momentary
light afflictions. John says those who have this hope
of being like Christ purify themselves.
We have been called to a full salvation. God is truly
the Savior of All men, but especially of believers.
A Final Note
Not all those who have written me regarding this
teaching have charged me with heresy. Many have
expressed great gratitude, and some have told me
that they felt these things must be true in their
spirit, but they did not know how to declare them
from Scripture. There have also been some who
have expressed sincere questions about these
matters, and I would like to include one such query
here. This brother asks an excellent question, and I
applaud him for being as a Berean and searching
out this matter to come to an answer that brings
peace. Following is his question to me:
It seems to me that the only way for a man to accept
correction and repent is if he is moved by the Holy
Spirit to do so. Man is desperately wicked and I
don’t believe that he can even have the desire to
repent without the prompting of the Holy Spirit.
Do you believe that the Bible teaches that Hell is
separation from God? If indeed a person is
separated from God in hell, how then can the spirit
deal with this man when the Spirit is not in hell
since in hell man is completely separated from God?
Is this reasoning flawed? Am I in error? Any help on
this matter would be greatly appreciated.
[end quote]
In one sense death does represent a separation from
God, but there is no such thing as a complete
separation from God. Paul tells us:
Acts 17:26-28
And He has made from one blood every nation of
men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has
determined their preappointed times and the
boundaries of their dwellings, so that they should
seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for
Him and find Him, though He is not far from
each one of us; for in Him we live and move
and have our being...
Elihu, in the book of Job, also expresses this
thought:
Job 34:14-15
If He should set His heart on it, if He should gather
to Himself His Spirit and His breath, all flesh would
perish together, and man would return to dust.
The creation cannot know separation from God in
an absolute sense and still remain. God is present in
all of His creation. Paul expresses this further in this
way:
Colossians 1:17
And He Himself existed before all things, and in
Him all things consist (cohere, are held together).
(Amplified Bible)
Even in Hell, God must be present in His creation,
or the creation would simply cease. David expresses
this concept of God being present everywhere, even
in Hell.
Psalms 139:7-12
Whither shall I go from thy spirit, or whither shall I
flee from thy presence? If I ascend up into heaven,
thou art there: if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou
art there. If I take the wings of the morning, and
dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea; even there
shall thy hand lead me, and thy right hand shall
hold me. If I say, "Surely the darkness shall cover
me", even the night shall be light about me. Yea, the
darkness hideth not from thee; but the night
shineth as the day: the darkness and the light are
both alike to thee.
The sense of this is plain. God is everywhere present
in the creation. I would add also that there is no
portion of God’s creation that does not bear His
image and character in some way. Even though the
creation suffers under sin and corruption, it was
originally created perfect. Although man may be a
fallen creature, he was originally created in the
image of God. Satan also was described as being
"perfect in beauty" and "the sum of wisdom ", before
his fall. These characteristics are those of God,
though they have now been marred by rebellion and
evil.
The Lake of Fire certainly has characteristics of
God. We have seen that the Lake of Fire is a place of
divine cleansing where all that is not like God is
consumed. We also have this description of God:
Deuteronomy 4:24
"For Yawheh your God is a consuming fire, a jealous
God."
Isaiah 33:14
Sinners in Zion are terrified; trembling has seized
the godless. "Who among us can live with the
consuming fire? Who among us can live with
continual burning?"
Hebrews 12:28-29
Therefore, since we receive a kingdom which cannot
be shaken, let us show gratitude, by which we may
offer to God an acceptable service with reverence
and awe; for our God is a consuming fire.
Is it not interesting that after the judgment, all
those whose names are not recorded in the book of
life must be thrown into the Lake of Fire, which is
called "the second death"? "Who among us can live
with the consuming fire? Who among us can live
with continual burning?" The Lake of Fire
represents this aspect of God that is most terrifying
to sinful man. The consuming fire of God will not be
quenched. It will burn until all that does not
resemble Yahweh’s own holy character is destroyed.
The most horrible judgment a sinner can encounter
is to be brought into the presence of a holy God
while still sinful. All that is wretched and vile and
wicked and rebellious will immediately begin to
wither away in the presence of the fire of the
holiness of God.
Understanding this, I believe that the Lake of Fire is
not separation from God, it is an encounter with
God’s holiness. Our God is described as a
consuming fire, and woe to the one who despises
the gift of God now, and who rejects Yahweh’s offer
to cleanse and purify them now while great grace is
offered. The same grace will not be available to
those who are cast into the Lake of Fire. They will
not come out until all that is left is God. In this we
see an echo of Christ’s parable of the unforgiving
servant.
Matthew 18:32-35
"Then summoning him, his lord said to him, 'You
wicked slave, I forgave you all that debt because you
entreated me. 'Should you not also have had mercy
on your fellow slave, even as I had mercy on you?'
And his lord, moved with anger, handed him over to
the torturers until he should repay all that was owed
him. So shall My heavenly Father also do to you, if
each of you does not forgive his brother from your
heart."
If we fear God, we will not despise the days of grace
we live in. We will seek to be emptied of self and to
live for the purposes of God. We will invite Yahweh,
as did David, to search us and see if there be any
wicked way in us, and to lead us in the path of life.
May all who read these things be blessed with peace
and understanding in these days.
Some Who Held This View
The following is an excerpt from a Biblical
Encyclopedia published in 1895. It is not intended
to serve as a proof of the reconciliation of the
creation through the cross of Christ. I merely share
it because often when we have not been taught
something, and it is new to us, we think that the
teaching must be obscure and therefore dangerous.
It would be a common response to view a teaching
with suspicion if we have not heard it expounded
before and if we are unfamiliar with the history of
those who have held the same view. I personally
would be extremely cautious about any teaching of
which I could find no adherents among the early
church, or through the 2,000 years of the church
age. The Scriptures and the Spirit are our foremost
witnesses of any teaching, but it is only sensible that
these witnesses would be speaking to the saints
throughout the history of the church if a teaching be
true.
So I offer this brief history of those who held a
universalist view of reconciliation, namely that all
things in heaven and on earth will be reconciled to
God through the cross of Christ. I myself was
surprised to find that this teaching has had so many
adherents when it is so glaringly absent in this
present hour.
The men who compiled this list did not believe in
the doctrine of universal reconciliation, but I think
they did a very admirable job of reporting things in
an unbiased manner, so much so that I was struck
by their openness and their resolve to not depict any
who held this view in a negative or derogatory light.
They openly praised some of these men for their
character and evangelism. I have added a few notes
and highlights in the text for my own reference, and
I decided to leave them intact just to share my
thoughts.
May you be blessed with peace and understanding
in these days,
Joseph Herrin
The following is taken from the Cyclopedia of
Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature,
Volume 10, 1895, pp. 109-33, Rev. John McClintock
and James Strong.
I. Origin and History. -
(I.) Informal. -
1. In Former Centuries.... In 195
Clemens Alexandrinus [Clement of
Alexandria], who was president of the
Catechetical School at Alexandria,
advocated Universalism on the ground
of the remedial character of all
punishment. His pupil and successor
in the school, Origen Adamantius,
famous alike for his learning, piety,
and zeal, taught Universalism on the
ground of the ever-continuing freedom
of the will, the deep mental and
spiritual anguish occasioned by the
light and knowledge of the truth until
it leads to repentance, and then the
harmony of the soul with God. Origen's
position, abilities, and untiring efforts
for the spread of the Gospel gave him
great influence with his pupils, and
with the Church at large, in whose
behalf he became a voluminous writer.
In addition to his position and work in
the school of Alexandria, he also had
care for several years, in connection
with Pamphilius, of the theological
school at Caesarea, one of whose
distinguished pupils was the celebrated
Gregory Thaumaturgus, a great
admirer of his master's theories, and
finally, about A.D. 235, his strong
defender and ardent eulogist.
Pamphilius, and Eusebius, the first
Church historian, also defended
Origen's doctrines from charges
brought against them by the Western
Church, and in answering the
complaint that he denied all future
punishment they quote from his
writings in contradiction thereof, not
only his positive assurances of future
and severe punishment, but his equally
positive assertion that such correction
is purifying and salutary. In A.D. 364,
Titus, bishop of Bostra, wrote in
advocacy of Universalism, contending
that, although there are torments in
the abyss of hell, they are not eternal,
but that their great severity will lead
the wicked to repentance and so to
salvation. Gregory of Nyssa, A.D. 380,
also advocated Universalism on the
same grounds. Contemporary with him
was the justly celebrated defender of
orthodoxy, Didymus the Blind, a
successor of Origen in the school at
Alexandria, and a zealous Universalist.
Prominent among his scholars was
Jerome, eminent alike for his abilities,
his inconsistencies, and instability.
Universalism as taught by Origen is
clearly and ably set forth by Jerome in
his commentaries on the epistles, and
in his letters. John, bishop of
Jerusalem at this period, was also an
advocate of Universalism on Origen's
theory. Another contemporary,
Diodorus, a teacher of great repute in
the school at Antioch, and afterwards
bishop of Jerusalem, was also a
Universalist, who, in opposition to the
then general prevalence of allegorical
interpretation, strictly adhered to the
natural import of the text in his many
commentaries on the Scriptures. He
defended Universalism on the ground
that the divine mercy far exceeds all
the effects and all the desserts of sin.
His pupil and successor in the school,
Theodore of Mopsuestia, A.D. 420,
called "the crown and climax of the
school of Antioch," and by the
Nestorians, whose sect he founded,
"the interpreter of the Word of God ,"
and whose writings were text-books in
the schools of Eastern Syria, was a
prominent and influential Universalist.
His theory was that sin is an incidental
part of the development and education
of the human race; that, while some are
more involved in it than others, God
will overrule it to the final
establishment of all in good. He is the
reputed author of the liturgy used by
the Nestorians, a Church which at one
time equaled, in its membership the
combined adherents of both the Greek
and Latin communions, and which has
had no rival in military zeal. In the
addresses and prayers of this liturgy
Universalism is distinctly avowed.
Theodoret, A.D. 430, bishop of Cyprus
in Syria, a pupil of Theodore of
Mopsuestia, was also a Universalist,
holding the doctrine on the theory
advocated by the Antiochian school.
For some time prior to this, certain
opinions of Origen on pre-existence
and on the salvation of the devil had
been in dispute and pronounced
heretical by a synod; but his doctrine
of the universal salvation of the human
race had not been involved in this
condemnation. At a local council called
by the emperor Justinian at
Constantinople, A.D. 544, Origen's
doctrine of universal salvation was
declared heretical. [Note who is
declaring this doctrine heretical - the
Roman Emperor.] Nine years later
another council was held by the same
authority at the same place, when
condemnation was pronounced on the
Nestorians, although their belief in
Universalism was not mentioned. It
has been common to call this an
ecumenical council, but without
warrant (see the action of the Latin
Church in refusing to recognize it or to
send a legate to it). Doderlein, in his
Institutes of Christian Theology, after
quoting the decree of Justinian against
Origen, says, "That was not the belief
of all, and in proportion as any one was
eminent in learning in Christian
antiquity, the more did he cherish and
defend the hope of the termination of
future "torments." Drexelius, in his
defense of eternal punishment, gives
this testimony, "That God should
doom the apostate angels and men at
the day of retribution to eternal
torments seemed so hard and
incredible a doctrine to some persons
that even Origen himself who was
mighty in the Scriptures, and no less
famous for his admirable wit and
excellent learning, presumed to
maintain in his book of principles that
both the devils and the damned, after
a certain period of years, the fire
having purged or cleansed them from
their pollutions, should be restored to
grace. Augustine and others set forth
his error and condemned him for it.
But, notwithstanding their
condemnation, this error has found a
great many in the world who have
given it a kind of civil reception. The
Anti heretics so called, dispersed this
error throughout all Spain under
various interpretations." Gieseler, the
ecclesiastical historian, says, "The
belief in the inalienable capacity of
improvement in all rational beings and
the limited duration of future
punishment, was so general, even in
the West, and among the opponents of
Origen, that, even if it may not be said
to have arisen without the influence of
Origen's school, it had become entirely
independent of his system." And
Augustine bears this testimony: "Some
- nay, very many - from human
sympathy commiserate the eternal
punishment of the damned and their
perpetual torture without
intermission, and thus do not believe
in it; not, indeed, by opposing the Holy
Scriptures, but by softening all the
severe things according to their own
feelings, and giving a milder meaning
to those things which they think are
said in them more terribly than truly."
Universalism almost wholly
disappeared during the period known
as the Dark Ages, although there are
occasional glimpses of it even in the
mutilated records which the papal
Church has permitted to descend to us.
[Note that this doctrine almost
disappeared during the "Dark Ages", a
time noted for the suppression of
truth, wherein it derives its name.]
In the 7th century, Maximus, the Greek
monk and confessor taught
Universalism; in the 8th, Clement of
Ireland was deposed from the
priesthood for teaching that when
Christ descended into hell he restored
all the damned; while in the 9th, John
Scotus Erigena, a famous philosopher
who stood at the head of the learned of
the court of France, was a bold
defender of Universalism. In the 11th
century, the Albigenses were,
according to papal authorities,
Universalists; [note again that the
papal authorities strongly resisted this
teaching. The papal authorities are not
known to be defenders of truth, but
rather suppressors of it.] In the 12th,
Raynold, abbot of St. Martin's, in
France, was charged before a council
with holding "that all men will
eventually be saved; " [Charged by the
Catholic Church] In the 13th, Solomon,
bishop of Bassorah, discussed the
question of universal salvation,
answering it in the affirmative. The
Lollards in the 14th century taught
Universalism in Bohemia and Austria;
and at the same period a council
convened by Langman, archbishop of
Canterbury, gave judgment against
Universalism as one of the heresies
then taught in that province. [This was
the period prior to the separation of
England from Catholicism which
occurred in 1529. Isn’t it interesting
how strenuously Rome has resisted
this teaching?] In the early part of the
15th century, a sect called "Men of
Understanding" taught Universalism
in Flanders, advocating it on the
ground of the German Mystics, as did
Tauler of Strasburg, and John Wessel,
who, with others, have been called "the
Reformers before the Reformation,"
whose writings Luther industriously
studied and greatly admired.
2. In Modern Times. - With the
Reformation, Universalism made a
fresh appearance early in the 16th
century, chiefly among some of the
Anabaptist sects. The seventeenth
article of the Augustine Confession,
1530, was expressly framed to
"condemn the Anabaptists, who
maintain that there shall be an end: to
the punishments of the damned and of
the devils." [Note - both Luther and
Calvin considered Augustine to be the
father of Roman Catholicism. See link
to Catholic encyclopedia -
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/0
2091a.htm] Denk, Hetzer, and
Stanislaus Pannonius were the most
eminent defenders of Universalism at
this period. Later in the century,
Samuel Huber, divinity professor at
Wittenberg, taught Universalism, it is
alleged by Spanheim; and because,
says Musheim, he would not go back to
the old methods of teaching, "he was
compelled to relinquish his office and
go into exile." Early in the 17th
century, Ernest Sonner, professor of
philosophy at Altorf, published "a
theological and philosophical
demonstration that the endless
punishment of the wicked would
argue, not the justice, but the injustice,
of God." John William Petersen, at one
time court preacher at Lutin, and
subsequently superintendent at
Lunenberg, adopted and defended
Universalism with such zeal that he
was cited before the consistory, and, as
he could not conscientiously renounce
his convictions, was deprived of his
office and forced into private life. In
his retirement he wrote and published
three folio volumes on Universalism,
entitled Musterion Apokatastaseos
Paltan, in which he mentions many
who had defended that doctrine. The
volumes appeared between the years
1700 and 1710. They opened a century
of spirited controversy, of which
Mosheim says, "The points of theology
which had been controverted in the
17th century were destined to excite
keener disputes in the 18th, such 'as
the eternity of hell torments, and the
final restoration of all intelligent
beings to order, perfection, and
happiness." Dietelmair, an opponent of
Universalism, wrote on its history
about the middle of this century. In the
preface to his work he speaks of the
contests which raged vehemently
enough within the very bounds of the
orthodox Church in the end of the last
century 'the' beginning of the present."
Among the defenses of Universalism
contained in the first volume of
Petersen's work was the Everlasting
Gospel, attributed to Paul Siegvolk,
which was but an assumed name of
George Klein-Nicolai, deposed for his
Universalism as preacher of Friessdorf.
He published other works in defense of
Universalism, but the most rapid and
lasting popularity belonged to the
Everlasting Gospel, which in forty-five
years passed through five editions in
Germany. In 1726 John Henry Haug,
professor at Strasburg, having
procured the assistance of Dr. Ernest
Christoph Hochman, Christian Dippel,
Count De Marcey, and others,
commenced the publication of the
Berleburger Bibel, an entirely new
translation and commentary of the
Holy Scriptures. They made
themselves familiar with all the
writings of the Mystics, and in their
great work taught and defended
Universalism from the Mystical
standpoint. Their work fills eight large
folio volumes, the last of which was
published in 1742. Strong persecution
assailing them, and no printer being
willing to risk his office in doing their
work, they were compelled to purchase
their own type and a small press.
When the Church they had established
was at last broken up by their enemies,
the members fled to America, taking
their press with them, and it was set up
by Christopher Sower in Germantown,
Pa. One of De Marcey's intimate
friends was George De Benneville,
born of French parents in London in
1703. Before he was twenty years of
age he commenced preaching in
France, where he was arrested and
condemned to die, but was reprieved
on the scaffold by Louis XV. Making
his way into Germany, he 'there
preached Universalism several years,
and then came to America. In 1727
appeared Ludvig Gerhard's Complete
System of the Everlasting Gospel of the
Restoration of All Things, together
with the Baseless Opposite Doctrine of
Eternal Damnation. The author was at
one time professor of theology in the
University of Rostock, and his
publication called forth, according to
Walch, no less than fourteen volumes
in reply. Jung, Stilling in the latter part
of the 18th century, an able defender of
Christianity against German
rationalism, was an ardent and
eminent Universalist. Prof. Tholuck
wrote, in 1835, that this doctrine
"came particularly into notice through
Jung-Stilling, that eminent man who
was a particular instrument in the
hand of God for keeping up evangelical
truth in the latter part of the former
century, and at the same time a strong
patron to that doctrine." During the
present century, Universalism has
made rapid progress in Germany.
Olshausen says of it that it '"has, no
doubt, a deep root in noble minds, and
is the expression of a heart-felt desire
for a perfect harmony of the creation."
Dr. Dwight wrote in 1829, "The
doctrine of the eternity of future
punishment is almost universally
rejected..."
In England the Protestants, in drawing
up their Forty-two Articles of Religion,
in 1552, condemned Universalism. Ten
years later, when the convocation
revised the doctrines of the Church,
the number of articles was reduced to
thirty-nine, omitting, among others,
the one condemning Universalism.
Since that time Universalism has not
been a forbidden doctrine in the
Church of England, but has been
advocated and defended by some of
the most eminent members of its
communion-such men as Dr. Henry
More, Sir George Stonehouse, Bp.
Thomas Newton, Dr. David Hartley,
William Whiston, Dr. Thomas Burnet,
Revs. Frederick W. Robertson, Charles
Kingsley, Stopford Brooke, and canon
Farrar, and indirectly by archbishop
Tillotson. The Presbyterian Parliament
of 1648, which temporarily overthrew
Episcopacy, passed a law against all
heresies, punishing the persistent
holders of some with death, and of
others with imprisonment. "That all
men shall be saved" was among the
heresies punishable in the latter
manner. [Note - it is interesting to see
how government has tried to suppress
this teaching.] This law was not long
operative, for the Independents,
headed by Cromwell, soon overthrew
the law-makers. Gerard Willstanley
published a work in advocacy of
Universalism only a few days after the
passage of the law, which was soon
followed by similar works from his
pen. William Earbury fearlessly
preached Universalism. Richard
Coppin was active in its advocacy,
publishing largely in its exposition and
defense, and was several times tried
for his offence. Samuel Richardson, an
eminent Baptist, also wrote strongly in
its behalf. Sir Henry Vane (the
younger), member of the Parliament
dissolved by Cromwell, and in 1636
governor of Massachusetts, was a
Universalist. Jeremy White, one of
Cromwell's chaplains, preached
Universalism, and published a work
which has passed through several
editions. Jane Lead, a Mystic, was the
author of several Universalist books.
Henry Brooke, a literary writer,
avowed his belief in Universalism in
his Fool of Qualify, and in a poem on
the Messiah. William Law, author of
the Serious Call, declared in his
Letters, "As for the purification of all
human nature, I fully believe it, either
in this world or some after ages." The
English literary reviews of the last
century contain many notices of works
in defense of Universalism. In 1750
James Relly, who had been a preacher
in Whitefield's connection, shocked at
the doctrine of reprobation, was by
meditation and study led into another
scheme of redemption, some of the
peculiarities of which may be said to
have had their origin with him.
Accepting as true the common theory
that all men, having sinned in Adam,
justly incurred eternal damnation, and
that Christ had borne this infinite guilt
and punishment in behalf of all who
should be saved, Relly was moved to
find, if possible, some ground of justice
in such a scheme. The divine law
explicitly declares that "the soul which
sinneth, it shall die," and that the
innocent shall not suffer for the guilty.
How could a transfer of human sin and
penalty to Christ be consistent with
that law? How could it be reconciled
with equity? The divine sovereignty,
without regard to inherent justice in
the plan, could not account for it for
the absoluteness that could set justice
aside might just as easily, and more
mercifully, have gone straight to its
aim by remitting instead of
transferring sin and its deserts. To say
that the sufferings of Christ were
merely accepted as satisfaction for
human deserts, only reckoned as such,
by God's sovereign pleasure, was no
adequate explanation, since they were
thus only a fictitious, not a real,
satisfaction; and, further, any
sufferings whatsoever, even those of a
man, would have answered just as well
as an arbitrary acceptance of the
coequal of God. The perfect
consistency of God's procedure, its
absolute harmony with justice and
equity, Relly found, as he claimed, in
such a real and thorough union of
Christ with the human race as made
their acts his, and his theirs. All men,
he held, were really in Adam and
sinned in him, not by a fictitious
imputation, but by - actual
participation; equally so are all men in
the second Adam, "the head of every
man," and he is as justly accountable
for what they do as is the head in the
natural body, accountable for the
deeds of all the members united to that
head. Accordingly Christ, in his
corporate capacity, was truly guilty of
the offence of the 'human race, and
could be, as he actually was, justly
punished for it; and the race, because
of this union, really suffered in him all
the penalty which he endured, and
thus fully satisfied justice. There is no
more punishment, therefore, due for
sin, nor any further occasion for
declaring the demands of the law,
except to make men feel their inability
to obey, and thus compel them to an
exclusive reliance on Christ the head.
He has effected a complete and
finished justification of the whole
world. When man believes this he is
freed from the sense of guilt, freed also
from all doubt and fear. Until he
believes it he is, whether in this world
or in another, under the condemnation
of unbelief and darkness, the only
condemnation now possible to the
human race. In illustration and
defense of this theory, Relly wrote and
published several books, preached
zealously in London and vicinity, and
gathered a congregation in the
metropolis. After his death in 1778,
two societies were formed from his
congregation; but both have now
ceased to exist, as has the society
gathered by Winchester about 1789,
and the Church founded by David
Thom, D.D., in Liverpool in 1825. The
Unitarians in England are all believers
in Universalism, as are also many of
the Congregationalists.
3. In America Universalism is the
result of the proclamation of a variety
of theories, some of them at a very
early date, all resulting in one
conclusion - the final holiness of the
human race. Sir Henry Vane as was
said above, was a Universalist. It is not
known that while in America he made
any public avowal of that belief; but
the presumption is that he did not
stand alone. In July, 1684, Joseph
Gatchell, of Marblehead, Mass., was
brought before the Suffolk County
Court for discoursing "that all men
should be saved," and, being convicted,
was sentenced "to the pillory and to
have his tongue drawn forth and
pierced with a hot iron." [It is hard to
understand how some could justify
such a punishment based upon
Scripture.] Dr. George De Benneville,
also mentioned above, came to
America in 1741, expressly called of
God, as he believed, to preach the
Gospel in the New World. For more
than fifty years he preached in various
parts of Pennsylvania, Maryland,
Virginia, and the Carolinas. He was not
an organizer, but simply a preacher,
and quite a voluminous writer, though
only a few of his productions were
published. For several years he was
welcomed to the pulpits of the
"Brethren" (Dunkers). It was no doubt
at his suggestion that Siegvolk's
Everlasting Gospel was translated into
English, and published by Christopher
Sower, printed, probably, on the
identical press on which the
Berleburger Bibel had been struck off.
This edition was reviewed by Rev. N.
Pomp, a German minister in
Philadelphia. Alexander Mack, an
eminent preacher among the Dunkers,
replied to Pomp, defending Siegvolk's
views. This work was never published,
but the M S. is still preserved. There
was found among Dr. De Bonneville's
papers, after his death, in 1793, a
Commentary on the Apocalypse, which
was printed in German, at Lebanon,
Pa., in 1808. There was also
Universalism in the Episcopal Church.
Rev. Richard Clarke, rector of St.
Philip's in Charleston, S. C., from 1754
to 1759, was a pronounced advocate of
it; as was Rev. John Tyler, rector of the
Church in Norwich, Conn., who wrote
a work in its defense, which was
published by some one to whom he
had loaned his MS., about 1787. Some
of the Congregationalists of New
England were believers in
Universalism; among them Dr.
Jonathan Mayhew, minister of the
West Church in Boston from 1747 to
1766, who distinctly avowed his belief
in it in a published Thanksgiving
Sermon, Dec. 9, 1762. Dr. Charles
Chauncy, minister of the First Church
in Boston from 1727 to 1787, issued a
pamphlet on the subject in 1782, which
was review ed by Dr. Samuel Mather.
In 1784 his larger work The Salvation
of All Men was published, a second
edition following in 1787. Dr. Joseph
Huntington, minister in Coventry,
Conn., from 1762 to 1794, left a work
in favor of Universalism, entitled
Calvinism Improved, which was
published in 1796.
Back | Beginning | Next |